Talk:Trams in Belgrade

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Trams in Belgrade - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Serbia: Belgrade Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as High-importance).

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

New Photos

Added new photos --IIAleksandarII (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tramvaj-KAF-1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Tramvaj-KAF-1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move article to "Trams in Belgrade"?

The title of this article is rather "non-standard" for English-language Wikipedia. Articles on metropolitan tram systems tend to have a "Trams in [city]" title - for example: Trams in Vienna, Trams in Prague, Trams in Moscow, etc.

If there are no objections lodged here in the next week or so, I intend to "move" this article to "Trams in Belgrade" in the near future. If anyone has issues with this, or other comments, please post them here. --IJBall (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The map and the list of lines is now inaccurate

Since June or July 2019, the lines 13 and 11 cross the Sava across the Ada Bridge and there is a loop across and around the future intercity coach (bus) station in New Belgrade (Novi Beograd) returning to the railway station of the same name and onwards towards their old terminus.

This is not represented on either the map (which I do not know how to edit, as it is not a JPG format) or the list of major directions of these two lines (ie 11 and 13). It should be fixed.

This is the current permanent state of the lines > https://xdn.tf.rs//2019/07/04/simpl-bg-map-830x0.jpg. Kindly have someone correct the map and the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.32.66 (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of line 1 section neutrality

This section is quite clearly written by somebody who does not support the initiative. This section should probably just stick to the facts rather than getting into a debate about its merits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.156.217.116 (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: