This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- It's a NAVIGATION BOX, theres no harm in leaving more related articles in the box, they're in parenthesis next to what they're related with. // Laughing Man 21:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't vandalise they were foreign interventions and thus different periods in the ongoing conflicts Like Afghan Civil War - US war in Afghanistan --TheFEARgod (Ч) 23:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
see Template:Campaignbox Afghanistan I'm reverting it back --TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but it’s not the same thing. Let’s check the box.
- Again trolling, eh you're accusing falsely by giving this quote. Your reasoning is pure logical fallacy as was your statement on talk:NATO aggression on FR Yugoslavia that only Serbia was struck. Please, first inform yourself on the events and then discuss them. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- again accusing. my POV is my business, however not expressed on the title change. Like you said "I’m just expressing my opinion", which is not better and neither worse from yours --TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
NATO Intervention
The reference to a 1st NATO Intervention in this campaignbox is terrible, given that it's just referring to Operation Deliberate Force. NATO was involved in the conflict years earlier with Operation Sky Monitor, Operation Maritime Monitor, Operation Sharp Guard, and Operation Deny Flight just to name a few. Furthermore, NATO was involved long after Deliberate Force through IFOR, SFOR etc. Referring exclusively to Deliberate Force in the box is misleading and confusing. Either someone should write a general article on NATO Intervention in Bosnia, or we should just remove that. Cool3 (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've taken my own advice and done it. NATO intervention in Bosnia. Cool3 (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)