Template talk:Finswimming

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Template talk:Finswimming - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Integration with Underwater diving template

I have combined all the underwater diving navboxes, as this allows more functionality for site navigation of diving related articles, but Finswimming is a little different in that a significant number of disciplines are not really diving, as they are performed exclusively at the surface. Therefore I have left {{Finswimming}} as an additional navbox in all the articles where I have added {{Underwater diving}}. If there are Finswimming articles which are exclusively about surface finswimming or underwater finswimming, the inappropriate navbox probably should be removed, with a edit summary noting why. There may also be a better solution I have not thought of. If so, let me know.· · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A possible alternative would be to group surface finswimming in a Swimming or Watersports navbox, but I am not involved in those projects, so will leave it to their discretion. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-links

The function of a navbox is to allow easy discovery of related articles, and to link to them so the reader can get there by a single click. This implies that a navbox is there to contain Wikilinks, and where useful, they may be grouped under a non-link descriptor. Ideally all links would be to full articles, or redirects/piped links to such an article, but Wikipedia is a work in progress and we do not yet have all the articles, so redirects to sections are also OK. The best way to do these is to run them through a redirect which has the potential to become a full article. Redlinks are not preferred, but at least they indicate where the article should be, and may be acceptable for important articles expected to be created soon - if you are planning on doing it yourself in the nearish future, or if you wish to draw attention to an article which really should already exist. Non-links are appropriate only as names for groups of links. It is also acceptable and useful to put in commented out links as a planning aid. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: