 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
[edit]Should we include the cabinet-level posts (Chief of Staff, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Director of National Drug Control Policy and Trade Representative)? Therequiembellishere (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Would someone mind making Bush 43's cabinet have the same format as Obama's?Xorthan (talk) 15:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
It was decided that we wouldn't because there are too many officials. Therequiembellishere (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Right. It looks like this.--chaser - t 21:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Gates and the Treasury
[edit]Hello all,
I've made two recent edits. Now for the easy one. The t/p was incorrect in stating that John Snow took over in 2002; he took office two months later. See Snow's Treasury bio. The second may be a bit a controversial. I've added a 2009 to Robert Gates' date as this shows when his tenure under Pres. Bush ended. For more details why, see Template talk:Obama cabinet#Robert Gates will continue to be Defense Secretary. Some site are already starting to do this; for example see POTUS: GWB, Obama and the Miller Center: GWB, Obama. Hope this helps. - Thanks, Hoshie 11:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Code
[edit]I used this code as the basis for {{Rendell cabinet}}. Thanks.--Blargh29 (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
FEMA
[edit]Hello all,
This t/p previously listed the FEMA Director as being of cabinet rank. This doesn't seem to be correct. It seems that GWB didn't give his FEMA Director cabinet rank. In an article after the 2008 election, CQ wrote:
During the Clinton administration, FEMA Administrator James Lee Witt met with the cabinet. His successor in the Bush administration, Joe M. Allbaugh, did not.
See here [1] for details. - Thanks, Hoshie 01:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2021
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would recommend moving the "Vice President" row to the top of the "Cabinet" section rather than have it listed under the "Cabinet-level" section. 2600:1700:2390:D50:8037:A261:859:B418 (talk) 01:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Done I've inverted the two sections (since I'm not really great with templates); hopefully this is a good solution RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
No! I meant just move the Vice President row from the "Cabinet-level" section to the top of the "Cabinet" section...not putting the entire "Cabinet-level" section over the "Cabinet" section. It's a little time-consuming, but you'll have to re-number the "group" and "list" categories for each row for both sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2390:D50:8037:A261:859:B418 (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Template-Class United States articles
- NA-importance United States articles
- Template-Class United States articles of NA-importance
- Template-Class United States Government articles
- NA-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://teknokrat.ac.id ){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://universitaspertamina.ac.id ){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://palcomtech.ac.id ){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://almaata.ac.id ){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://universitaspertamina.ac.id/){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://palcomtech.ac.id/){kind=link}
-1.gif&origine=&site=https://almaata.ac.id/){kind=link}
