Template talk:Kim family (North Korea)

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Template talk:Kim family (North Korea) - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Korea

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related

Associated working groups:
/
	This template is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This template is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Genealogy

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy

Military history: Asian / Korean

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force

Politics

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Socialism

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism

discussion about romanization

There's a discussion at Template_talk:Kim_Jong-il_family#Romanization that is of relevance to this template too. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved to Template:Kim dynasty (North Korea), matching the article Kim dynasty (North Korea). And as a reminder, template names rarely matter a great deal. I've proposed a move of that article, but it's no big deal if the templates don't move with it. --BDD (talk) 23:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Family of Kim Jong-il → Template:Kim family – This template is not centered around Kim Jong-il, it's about the family as a whole. Charles Essie (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate rename to Template:Kim Communist Dynasty family -- 65.94.76.3 (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment up until 2013, Kim family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was not about the North Korean ruling family. According to Kim (Korean surname), this is the most common surname in Korea, so there are many families that someone might create a tree for, so just "Kim family" is insufficiently precise or disambiguous. Many Kims are notable. -- 65.94.76.3 (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment see Template talk:Kim Jong-il family tree and talk:Kim family for related move requests -- 65.94.76.3 (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Template talk:Kim Jong-il family tree#Requested move. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Category:Kim Il-sung family was recently moved to Category:Kim family, which I find a bit confusing. This category title is hardly descriptive, as Kim is the most common surname in Korea, and the family of Kim Il-sung is hardly the most notable. What about 16th century Korean nobles? What about wealthy business tycoons named Kim? Calling the whole thing "Kim family" is a bit counter-productive in my opinion. "Kim Il-sung family" uses the name of Kim Il-sung (the first president within the successing line of three) as a descriptor to firmly show which Kim family it is about. --benlisquare_T•C•E 00:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New proposal, Template:Kim Dynasty (North Korea). Charles Essie (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we really need the "(North Korea)" disambiguation? Seems unnecessary to me as there is no other Kim Dynasty. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yeah, that makes sense. Charles Essie (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- New proposal is much better than the original proposal. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - With the rename of the main article to Kim dynasty (North Korea), the template can safely be called Template:Kim dynasty (North Korea) to match the name of the main article. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support New proposal, Template:Kim Dynasty (North Korea). There are many Kims. The set of Dynasties is not well defined. "Kim" is not well recognized as the well recognized "Kim of North Korea". The "North Korea" is very helpful. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Formatting

Imo this is a bit of an eyesore. Should be reformatted somehow to be cleaner. toobigtokale (talk) 05:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: