User talk:69Avatar69

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

User talk:69Avatar69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

69Avatar69, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]

Hi 69Avatar69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Archiving talk page sections

[edit]

I forgot to mention on my edit summary on Talk:1978 California Proposition 13 that you can also click the "Archive" link on the right of the section heading to archive that section.

Thanks for your other edits, and I also wanted to commend you on recognizing now that some of your previous edits were original research and fixing those. Thanks!! ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 04:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, will do. I'm still not sure if my edit about pensions (100k club plus irs limits) was editorializing or if it can be worked in there. I felt it was a little bit provocative but it really illustrates how mismanaged the pensions were.69Avatar69 (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That edit with the $100k club and IRS limits is Original Research, specifically because neither of those articles mentions Prop 13. Those references and your summary of them would be appropriate in a new "Criticism" section in the Public employee pension plans in the United States, for example. While we may not want Criticism sections for politicians, for POLICIES or other things, it is perfectly acceptable. (for example the section got so big it has its own article: Criticism of capitalism).

This edit of mine I tried to stay as close to what the source said, and maybe is something you can use as an example: [[1]] Also: TransparentCalifornia is a website that openly publishes CA pay and pension data. --Thanks for finding good references!! I hadn't seen some of those news articles myself. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 04:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69Avatar69&oldid=926873911"

Hidden category:

Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation