archive

Welcome!

Thanks for uploading Image:Backbend.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 203.214.91.5 09:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At the time I deleted it, it consisted of the {{db-empty}} tag, having been blanked by yourself. The page creator blanking a new page is a common reason for speedy deletion, as it is assumed that the user made a mistake in creating it or changed their mind. Please assume good faith in future. -- Francs2000 04:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS sorry if I bit too hard, I'm not feeling too well just now! Feel free to recreate the redirect. -- Francs2000 04:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:DMCCampus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:22, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Spartanseating.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On June 28, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Cold War (hockey), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 04:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed your nomination of Michigan State University for Good Article status because it is already a Featured Article, which is higher than GA. Let me know if you have any questions. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stands.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 15:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rkevins82 19:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The assertion that the photograph you posted was one you created was wholly inappropriate. Furthermore, you are making two claims with the current tag: that it may be used as long as it is properly sourced (says who, and where?), and that it is a historic photo which is of such singular value as to be released from it general display (a categorization which is disputed). Which is it?

Also, the blanking of the memorable games section was accidental. I am using a new browser and I have done the same at Ohio Stadium - a result which I cannot explain. Please sing future comments with four tildes ~~~~. Thanks! Rkevins82 15:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history I see no blanking of the memorable games. The image should be removed until the status of the image is resolved. Rkevins82 15:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to clear that up (and scan the images). Like I said, the blanking was accidental and I still cannot remedy the problem with my current (work) browser. Apologies. The historical tag is probably fine as long as they resolve the fair use issues - I think they should soon. You'll probably have to wait more than a few years, though, to state the creator died 100+ years ago, as the image was taken in 1913. I look forward to adding to the Spartan Stadium article. Rkevins82 17:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Coldwar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Hello. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Karmanos Cancer Institute, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.karmanos.org/app.asp?id=10, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Karmanos Cancer Institute. Then you should do one of the following: :*Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Karmanos Cancer Institute where we can find that note; or :*Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Karmanos Cancer Institute. It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Onorem 18:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC 2622.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — BigDT 05:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kci logo top.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What sports do you play?

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sticky mouse syndrome, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Berserkerz Crit 11:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is tantamount to vandalism. Berserkerz Crit 11:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not tantamount to anything, either it is vandalism or it is not. According to the warning I can take the message down if I so object. I object, therefore I will take it down. Please direct discussion to the discussion page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AStudent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to begin the article on the surgical prodecure vagectomy - I think that creating that article should be worthwhile enough to remove my ban. Plus, I've also edited quite a few pages through my IP address, so I'd like you to also consider that.

Decline reason:

Please follow the instructions above. You have to prove you can contribute productively before we will unblock you. — Yamla 03:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AStudent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hasn't my contributions under my IP address already shown that? Search http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.85.145.215

Decline reason:

A block is a block, so it shouldn't be abused by using multiple accounts. And we already have an article on Vagotomy. — Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 05:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for uploading Image:JTMadden.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bd54.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:P22band.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:74554.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P9100716.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC_2535.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Msu-um-2001b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC_2961.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC_5048.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:JJJJust has put an article you started, Tornado emergency, up for deletion.

--Ks0stm 20:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya,

Just a courtesy note. I've closed the recent AFD on this article, that you created. Unfortunately both consensus and policy seem to agee the game wasn't notable, so the article was removed.

However I did use my discretion, and feel the flag planting incidents of 2005 that it started, were notable. I've preserved the article prior to deletion in your user space, at User:AStudent/2005 Michigan State vs. Notre Dame football game, in case you want to create something like 2005 football flag planting meme or some such.

Hopefully this will preserve what was truly notable, and put it into its own context :)

Best,

FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 01:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flagplant.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:WSUSOMShield.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stannered (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Stannered (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://stadiumandmain.blogspot.com/2006/04/2001-weirdest-season-ever.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard3.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. [LukeTheSpook] | ^{[t c r]} 21:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You obviously did not create this yourself, Please DO NOT post copyrighted images and claim you created them without justification. [LukeTheSpook] | ^{[t c r]} 21:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://stadiumandmain.blogspot.com/2006/04/2001-weirdest-season-ever.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Pl8-2001-scoreboard2.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. [LukeTheSpook] | ^{[t c r]} 21:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC) *Another one you obviously didn't create. Unless you can state specifics, such as when taken, with what camera, ect, please do NOT upload images under a false license.[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ferry.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 18:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wargamesscreens.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AStudent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Begin article on FRIB "Facility for rare isotope beams (http://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/Publications/Detail/tabid/125/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/7793/Facility-for-Rare-Isotope-Beams-FRIB-Economic-Impact-Michigan-State-University-US-Department-of-Energy.aspx)"

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. Please see WP:GAB for a guide to appealing your block. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 07:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Considering that you have been blocked for a year and a half, I'm willing to give you another chance. Request handled by: Trusilver 08:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Onepercentdoc.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carbamazepine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily's Law, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Isotonic, Stat and Pariah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AStudent,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adena Regional Medical Center for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike high schools and railway stations, hospitals are not regarded as inherently notable. (The schools and stations aren't mentioned in policy so far as I know, but common practice is to assume that they are...). For hospitals, you have to show the notability and reference with WP:RS and so far, you haven't. I'm not deleting it this time (someone else probably will), but you should take note of this if you want to save it. Peridon (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Your latest version is now at User:AStudent/Adena Regional Medical Center. Fuhghettaboutit's comment was "this was userfied yesterday which still exists. Make basic article b/f moving to mainspace; this is an unsourced one liner". Over to you - but please ask for an opinion before moving it to article space or re-creating it there. I can ask someone who is not involved and very good at assessment to give the opinion if you don't trust me to be neutral. (I am trying to help you - you can go on your own way if you want, but I don't think it'll work.) Peridon (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AStudent. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sand geyser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sand geyser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 17:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AStudent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AStudent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Milwaukee Tumor. Since you had some involvement with the Milwaukee Tumor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amphyl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphyl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mile road system. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 6#Mile road system until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 02:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect F.U.B.A. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 5#F.U.B.A. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]