Any specific reason? Aepoutre 19:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, you simplified the proof of A+ = A* (A A*)+ a lot, great work! --RainerBlome (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emergency use authorization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public health emergency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abelian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abelian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:PHEMCE Multi Year Budget 2016-2020.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm _Talk 07:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:PHEMCE Multi Year Budget 2018-2022.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm _Talk 14:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:PHEMCE Multi Year Budget 2017-2021.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm _Talk 14:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proofs involving the Moore–Penrose inverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proofs involving the Moore–Penrose inverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hi Abelian, the page has already been transwikied to Wikibooks, including edit history, but dewikified there. For links, see the discussion. The question is whether Wikibooks is a better place than Wikipedia for the proofs page. I notified you because you've contributed the most edits to the page (which used to be a subpage of Moore–Penrose inverse, but subpages have been disabled in article space). Regardless of the outcome of the deletion discussion, I highly appreciate your contributions. You've significantly improved the proof page, thank you! Should you participate in the move discussion, I would be especially interested in whether you think you would have contributed as much if the page was hosted at Wikibooks. Happy editing! --RainerBlome (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Abelian,

I am a new editor on Wikipedia by the name of Kabiryani (Kabir for short)! When I started editing, the Wikipedia algorithm suggested that I do some referencing on an article on Latin Letters used in Mathematics. I was surprised when I saw absolutely no citations for such an important mathematical article! I came to you since your name is Abelian and the Latin letter A represents an Abelian Group! I've started to do some citations but it's a slow process. If you or the Mathematics WikiProject, could help me reference this article, I would be very gracious! I am currently doing GCSE level maths but I am a keen and able mathematician in England! I would also love to learn more about the steps I need to take to join a WikiProject and help contribute to this fantastic resource! --Kabiryani (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abelian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]