Archives

/Archive 1

Thanks for the comments at the talk page from Tsubasa. By the way, were you the user who expanded the article with a lot of production info and other info, right? I was seeing if I could expand the conception info from the list of Tsubasa's characters, but everything I could find from the character guide books was in Japanese so I couldn't add anything. My English is not pretty good since I'm still studying such language, so before nominating it to GA, a copyeditor made a revision. I was also worried about the plot's length, so I just tried to focus in the main details, but it is still a bit long. Feel free to edit the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that would be me. I also worked on the media section like the anime and music and other stuff. I'd be more than happy to read the Japanese sources and add anything relavent. I can use what books and things I have to try and add content. I was just so surprised that on the one day I decide to look at the Anime Wikiproject homepage again, I see that Tsubasa has been nominated for GA status and I was really surprised and ecstatic. I'll defintely help out with the articles since the series was something that I spent a lot of time on. AngelFire3423 (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You had also made a great work in the articles before. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After some work on reception and creation, I redirected the article Syaoran (Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle) to a single article. I still have to source the appearances section, while the conception section is kind of very short, but I only found that type of information in Japanese character guidebooks, so I didn't understand them. Moreover, next Saturday I will be taking a two-week wikibreak, so I will be a bit inactive to check Syaoran or if the Tsubasa article is getting reviewed. You are welcome to check it and do anything. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry sorry, I've been really busy. I often find myself trying to do too much and editing Tsubasa again was sort of a splurge. I was just really excited to get the main article to GA status. I really would like to spend time on these articles but hopes are still hopes. But I'll definitely chip in when it undergoes review. I'm waiting for some nice books, Clamp in Wonderland 11 and 12, to arrive in the mail and hopefully they will be of some use. Once again props to you for getting the article to this stage. AngelFire3423 (talk) 09:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. By the way, here I found the raw versions from the volumes from Clamp no Kiseki. In "Ver Online" there are the interviews, but all in Japanese. Besides Syaoran, I was planning to also recreate the Sakura article (the clone one), Yuko and Watanuki after searching for reception information. While Sakura and Yuko have some info, I couldn't find anything about Watanuki and maybe Clamp no Kiseki books have some. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! Tsubasa became a GA article!Tintor2 (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome, though it makes me sad that I didn't even know it was going through a GA review... AngelFire3423 (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay :) You had already made an awesome work in the article before I got to see it.Tintor2 (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. It was actually page 205. It was in a small "Early Material Gallery" which only covers Syaoran, Fujitaka, Kurogane, Souma and woman that looks like Amaterasu. Such section is within the material gallery from the guidebook. I think adding that creation info you found about the characters would be very good but I guess it only contains info from vols 1-14 as I saw the books. About other Clamp series, I was planning to try to work in Watanuki, Yuko and X's Kamui Shiro, but I wasn't sure since I couldn't find anything about creation regarding them. The X (manga) article contains a lot of creation of X but I have no access to its sources. Tintor2 (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was the one who started the peer review of the aforementioned article. I just saw your comments on the talk page and while I greatly appreciate them, could you post the links of the interviews that you saw? They would be of great help in improving the article and make it less messy and be more about her rather than her anime work. It's doesn't help that her Japanese Wiki article (which is a stub) doesn't have any reliable references. And what do you mean about the composers? You mean either Kazuya Takase or Tomoyuki Nakazawa are better than the other? And should information about them be in Kawada's article? And yes, it's rather disappointing that little is known about her life (like other I've Sound singers except those of Larval Stage Planning, her birthdate is unknown, although her blood type [O] isn't). Any work you can do in her article would be of great help. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post the interview links in the main article's talk page. I'm fairly positive with sufficient digging you can find some information. Unfortunately I don't think I know Kawada for doing anything other than music. She has done a tour so that's something to which you could probably dedicate a paragraph. Extra notes on DVDs would be quite useful, that is, if they feature any artist interviews. As of yet I don't know any source that will tell you what the DVD extras are other than wikipedia on occasion, but then again DVDs cost money and aren't something you can get through less legitimate means. I suppose the biggest barrier to research would be whether or not you can read Japanese. But actually as I'm writing this reply, I discover she has a twitter which might be useful for fishing for inspiration. And yes those are the two composers I am referring to. AngelFire3423 (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scanlation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fansub may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to the assumption of an exclusively viable child-targeted market. Macek edits ''Macross'', ''[[Orguss]'', and ''[[Southern Cross]]'' together into ''[[Robotech]]'' and lands a resounding

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fansub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King’s College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no see. I have good and bad news. Tsubasa's Sakura article became a GA but I failed to make the movie a GA. Additionally, I'm trying to make Yu Kanda become a GA but it still needs some copyediting. Anyways, glad to see you. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AngelFire3423. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]