Welcome!

Hello, BP OMowe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MaenK.A._Talk 08:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 8x63 mm patron m/32, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 8x63 mm m/32. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, First thanks for your contributions and introducing some Swedish reference material. Sadly the 8x63 mm patron m/32 nomenclature does not conform to the conventions used for metric cartridges nomenclature used in Wikipedia. Metric cartridges in Wikipedia English articles use the AxBmm other stuff pattern. For this cartridge I read several alternatives for the other stuff part. What do you think is the most appropriate other stuff or can we omit the other stuff? Sadly we can not use the C.I.P. rulings nor SAAMI guidelines as a help for the most appropriate cartridge nomenclature, since there are no data sheets available. Can you provide information if this cartridge was used by sport shooters and hunters, since it performs quite close to the 8×64mm S cartridge and the rebated rim idea was later used in the bigger 8×68mm S cartridge?--Francis Flinch (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copy this to the discussion page for the article itself, maybe we can get more input. BP OMowe (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Panzer 38(t) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stridsvagn 103 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• php?8/ Society S-tank- Welcome to The S tank association] - official site of the S tank association]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BP, and thanks for your contributions to the Saab JAS 39 Gripen article. However, one of your latest additions was reverted by another editor who stated his concerns in his edit summary. Per WP:BRD, one should not revert back, as that could be the beginning of an edit war. There is only one R in WP:BRD, and one revert was already done before yours. Please acquaint yourself with that guideline, and discuss with the other editor on the article talkpage. There's every chance that you might find middle ground between the two of you, that could establish a new WP:CONSENSUS.

Thank you.

HandsomeFella (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saab 37 Viggen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fighter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Combat Vehicle 90 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *{{NLD}}: 193 CV9035NL (Initial order of 184 vehicles<ref name="bae-nl">{{cite web | url=http://www.baesystems.se/Hagglunds/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO, disputed content should not be edited while it is under discussion. Per WP:STATUSQUO, when edits have been disputed, and while the matter is under discussion the status quo reigns.You should not just force your edits into the article without first establishing consensus on the talk page. --AussieLegend (✉) 15:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, it is you who do disrupting edits against both the consensus on the talkpage AND against the MOS you referred to. Looking at the history of the article, this is quite prominent. BP OMowe (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read the guidelines. Your edit while discussion is underway introduced a number of errors that had been explained on the article talkpage. As for consensus, what is on the talkpage does not constitute consensus. --AussieLegend (✉) 00:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer care about the guidelines, as you are Advocating and being obstructive, which the history if the Amish Mafia clearly shows. Its evident that discussions will not solve this matter, and hence I'll take it elsewhere. BP OMowe (talk) 20:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lisa Lyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. BP OMowe (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simo Häyhä may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //yle.fi/uutiset/ei_ne_osumat_vaan_se_asenne/6972008&usg=ALkJrhgZid41km8Zj-fvPWd4CjyRucqmCQ Yle]</ref><ref name="Feist2012"/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WebRTC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Browser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Flash suppressor page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you added a copyright issues tag to Jameson's mamba but have not listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems or left a note on the talk page to say if you are going to handle the issue yourself. Unless you do one of those things it is unlikely anyone will take action on the article, or know that you intend to fix it yourself. I only happened to stumble across it because I'm currently working on Black mamba. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually working on the Swedish article, checking the sources, when I noticed the text been copied straight into wikipedia (unless the source copied wikipedia of course). Simply finding a tag not outdated required several walls of text, listing it even more and not very concise prose. Long story short, just too much work so I left the tag there without intention to fix it myself (although I'll probably reluctantly get around to do it eventually because no one else does) BP OMowe (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Industrigruppen JAS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrigruppen JAS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Verbal.noun (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frivolous nomination as the article already had the necessary references and was well within the notable realm. Anyway, all dealt with. BP OMowe (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Pansarterrängbil 203, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article.

Pyrotle {^T/_C} 20:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary page to fix wikidata-links before making redirect. BP OMowe (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may delete this section if you want. I responded to your original comment here. Pyrotle {^T/_C} 21:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I don't like deleting things ;-) BP OMowe (talk) 21:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chris_Kyle/Archive_1#Tally Just as a forewarning, this isn't the first time DHeyward has challenged the sentence about sniper kill counts. He's reverted it multiple times, every time someone puts it back, he reverts it out. The sentence was there for months before he and MONGO came along and started to WP:OWN the page in early January. He's also engaged in edit warring on the American Sniper (film) page. So, I'm glad he hasn't bared his fangs at you, yet, but he will revert stuff and make up whatever justification he has out of thin air. I hope you can reason with him, as thus far he pretty much will act unreasonably toward those whom do not agree with his opinions which he takes as facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2:4E00:C662:C8B6:E565:5CDE:7945 (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind bared fangs, as long as the article gets correct, written in accordance with reliable sources. Personal experience tells me how easy it is to get locked up in a specific view of how things are to be written and what is to be included, so for now I'll assume good faith in spite of the obvious conduct. I do appreciate the archive-link, should administrative actions be needed to calm things down. BP OMowe (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BP- thank you for your diplomatic and constructive work on Chris Kyle. Not the easiest topic to keep NPOV! - Wormcast (talk) 14:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stridsvagn 122, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smoke discharger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please stop changing the translation of the Swedish word "stridsvagn" in the article. The correct translation for "stridsvagn" is just "tank", not "battle tank". "Battle tank" has no meaning in English other than as part of the name of a subclass of tanks ("main battle tank"). Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 20:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. BP OMowe (talk) 17:43, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Saab 29 Tunnan into United Nations Operation in the Congo. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, as I've been unable to establish who actually wrote that particular part of the article. Is there any kind of tool on the wiki site to see who added a text? BP OMowe (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BP OMowe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, BP OMowe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BP OMowe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Jason Zimmerman, you may be blocked from editing. --Netoholic @ 19:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, YOU are the disrupting one, as you go against both the convention for titles of video game players and the consensus that established said convention. BP OMowe (talk) 22:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Husband, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torp. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Audio-fi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have no knowledge of its purpose or usage, so I do not feel qualified to give input on this matter. BP OMowe (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenuineArt (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, the article was rewritten with all existing sources removed, and request for motivation ignored. Thus those changes failed to reach consensus and then the article should be reverted as per existing policy. BP OMowe (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just came back to say that I have no problem with your recent edits to this Russian Orthodox Army article and hope this version will stay. GenuineArt (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new additions on RM12. Some of it needed some corrections and copy editing, and I've done what I could. However, some of the new section is still written awkwardly in English. I realize you were tired, but if you could go over it again in a day or two, that would be good. Since the sources are in Swedish, there's not much more I can do to improve it myself. (My English is bad enough sometimes!) Thanks again. BilCat (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three in the morning here, so I'd be hard pressed being coherent in Swedish right now. :) Sleeping on it is probably the best way to improve the text, but the worst is done at least. See you later today! BP OMowe (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fry sauce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plantain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MBB Bo 105, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Försvarsmakten.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liquidpiston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Talmeter, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 13:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot the brackets for the redirection needed for interwiki linking, had a helpful user fixed that already. BP OMowe (talk) 14:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RBS 70, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mach and IFF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. BP OMowe (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

FFV 016 mine

added a link pointing to FFV

FFV 028 mine

added a link pointing to FFV

Nordic Biker War

added a link pointing to AT-4

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. BP OMowe (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask what you are doing here? It appears to be a WP:CPMOVE, which aren't allowed. From a diff, the page content is substantially similar, so one page needs to be redirected. Mdann52 (talk) 07:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the procedure differs between wiki-languages, I'll look into the correct one for enwp and get that sorted. BP OMowe (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! If it's a page move, you'll need an admin to help as that page has been edited. Wp:RM may be the correct avenue here? Mdann52 (talk) 07:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the most efficient alternative was to use the Wikipedia:Requests for history merge for the article and talk page. All interwiki-links and such has been fixed. BP OMowe (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]