Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Hi BronMeat! I noticed your contributions to Dinosaur emojis and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Staraction (talk · contribs) 08:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks gng ❤️‍🩹❤️‍🩹❤️‍🩹 BronMeat (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Glossary of 2020s slang has been reverted.
Your edit here to Glossary of 2020s slang was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/im-crine) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Glossary of 2020s slang have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  
Your edit here to Glossary of 2020s slang was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gng) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fixed, thanks gng BronMeat (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BronMeat. Thank you for your work on Acquaintances of Jeffrey Epstein. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Parts of this article, such as the Background section, have been detected as being generated by an LLM. Per WP:NEWLLM, this is not allowed. Please rewrite those sections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review twin, also not to be defensive but didn't use Ai for the article but no prob will rewrite BronMeat (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments so far on this site are written in shorthand "gamer speak", which is not cute in a collaborative encyclopedic environment in my opinion.

For you to tag in to my incredibly personal description of ways I've felt hurt on this website as a queer woman and go "lol it sounds like chatgpt no offense tho" is beyond the pale inappropriate. I notice that you probably did this because you yourself were accused of using LLMS- and the draft that was accused, unlike my zany, run-on non LLM ramblings, actually did read exactly like GPT output.

The difference, just so you don't pull this incredibly rude shit with another editor after me, is that you submitted your writing in article space to be reviewed and I was talking to someone else informally about my experience as a new editor. In other words, even if I had demonstrated hallmarks of AI-gen output, it would have been highly rude of you to stick your nose in to make an accusation unbidden. (Unbidden means "no one asked you.")

I finally got up the nerve to start contributing more meaningfully to en.wiki tonight, after living with devastating OCD for years and being afraid to communicate with the world because, oh you guessed it, people are rude and make ridiculous assumptions and judge others on the Internet for no reason! Thanks for making me feel terrible just as I feared because, what exactly? What did you expect to accomplish? Because it sure wasn't a good faith question about whether I used LLMs in the hopes of helping me if I didn't realize that's against the rules. That is the only way you should be engaging with other editors on this topic, not with vague accusations.

Enjoy your little corner of en.wiki, I hope it stays well separated from mine because I'm disgusted with your rude little accusation. I have been on technical steering committees that intended to prevent the current unethical design of LLM systems, and how they're enshittifying the modern discursive sphere. (That means "how people talk in society.") If you actually think I write like I'm using AI assistance, I highly encourage you to follow up with an admin or ANI so that you can get a well-rounded and universal "uhhhh no" from all the incredibly skilled Wikipedians who do recognize the signs of LLM output.

In conclusion, UGH GROSS. Sophiatries (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i offended you gang, i work with machine learning alogtithms and it kinda sounded like that. In terms of how i speak its just what happens when your raised in my type of place, moving around contries and cities (although some of it is just, as you called it, gamer speak)

Anyways didnt mean any offence and I appreciate you, your work, and your ciricism, all love.

Also, I think this message proves you are a prolific writer, i kinda got invested into this BronMeat _talk 11:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also i didnt say this because i wanted to hurt you, or deflect blame from myself or somthing, it was more of a joke (and how loads of authors and writers get accused of Ai for using em dashes)

I said "all good tho" to say that is light hearted, but i get you, and i want to apologise in case this hurt you, also did not mean to make it look like i said "cool story bro", i kinda wanted to appreciate your view on the username, which i think can represent queer representstion, as you said

Also find llms sad, but i guess im not the only one BronMeat _talk 12:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophiatries This is a personal attack, and a pretty bad one. Please be more respectful. – LuniZunie_(talk) 18:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophiatries
all the incredibly skilled Wikipedians who do recognize the signs of LLM output.
Also, per this. At first glance this message actually, too, looks AI generated. I don't believe it is, but, I would like to point you towards Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith.

Your comments so far on this site are written in shorthand "gamer speak"
And per this. That's how someone speaks, do you walk up to a foreigner and tell them to use your accent? Do you tell a British person to not say "mate", "cheers", "chap", and other things that that culture predominately uses? No, you don't.

ways I've felt hurt on this website as a queer woman and go "lol it sounds like chatgpt no offense tho"
And finally, per this. Being queer has absolutely nothing to do with this, and I don't see any reason for it to be brought up. – LuniZunie_(talk) 18:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophiatries Anyways, I don't want to deter you from further editing, but, this was not the right way to address something. Don't take any of this personally, but please, please, take a breath before you send people messages like this. Many users would not take it as well as BronMeat did, me included. – LuniZunie_(talk) 18:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks twin. I think it'd be best to move on from this rather than pour fuel on a fading fire. All love though, and I really appreciate this.

Final take: I would love to ragebait but i dont want to make anyone any more mad, i've seen what happens when you let simple disputes go too far, it ends bad for everyone. (Too many widows and orphans although gang violence is an extreme example for this.) There is the "i came up on my own 2 feet and got out of the hood at 16" card but i'd rather end this BronMeat _talk 10:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BronMeat. Thank you for your work on Properties of Jeffrey Epstein. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

WP:NEWSBREAK is deprecated and needs to be replaced with the original source. There are also some unsubstantiated claims.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did see the message about the deprecated source but didn't know which one it was talking about, replacing. with something else BronMeat _talk 07:38, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Epstein-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:32, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]