Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal and Imperial Majesty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Royal and Imperial Majesty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CIN I&II! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CIN I & II. Things seem silent with Frederick the Great. Are you still reviewing, and just working and waiting until you have a complete summary? Is something else going on, and you are just too busy? Should we restart the process? Please let me know, if possible. Wtfiv (talk) 02:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC) article.) Wtfiv (talk) 02:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah sorry, things have gotten really busy wish school just now and stuff. I'm sorry for not being able to properly... You probably should get someone else cause I think I'm gonna be pretty busy for now. --CIN I&II (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for update. Good luck with school. It's finals time, huh? Good luck with the school work! Wtfiv (talk) 07:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've update the review, but if you are interested in continuing with the review, and it is a kind of end-of-the-semester delay, we can certainly work with that, particularly if you have a timeline when you'd be able to change focus again. And no matter what, good luck with those whatever you are working on! Wtfiv (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CIN I&II. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal and Imperial Majesty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Royal and Imperial Majesty, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, I had meant to put it up for speedy deletion as I had not properly understood the suggesting a redirect before and so thank you for deleting it. --CIN I&II (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Full Armorial of the Coat of Arms of Westarctica.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Arthur Lacey-Scott in Glenbrook No Supporters.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you for telling me, I put in my opinion on it there. CIN I&II (talk) 07:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It has come to the CheckUsers' attention that you are currently blocked under a different username. This would normally be grounds for another block as block evasion is disallowed, but as the block is old and you have had some positive contributions on this account, I wouldn't consider blocking your account currently preventative, and so I will not do that. I am however warning you to stop with the style of edits that currently exist in your sandbox, which are WP:NOTWEBHOST violations, and you were cautioned for on your previous account. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 21:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thank you on that, if you would like I can clear my sandbox page out in order to avoid any issues with WP:NOTWEBHOST. I don’t want to have that issue in that regard in it. Also I would like to thank you on not instating a new block. I do still believe my old block was somewhat rushed and had issues, but I am very glad that my contributions and care I put into trying to make Wikipedia a better place every edit do show through. Thank you for your kindness and understanding. CIN I&II (talk) 21:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Full Armorial of the Coat of Arms of Westarctica.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have voted, thank you for the reminder to do so, I will share it with the people who I know who have accounts who can vote. -CIN I&II (talk) 04:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]