Ensiklopedia Dunia

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

User talk:Casdmo - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello!

Would you like to talk? —Casdmo (talk) 02:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:

post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
the Arab–Israeli conflict
abortion
articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
climate change
COVID-19, broadly construed
governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues
genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed
pseudoscience and fringe science
the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour

She should not be given alerts for those areas.

116 Clique

I have improved upon this page. I have added tables and references and I believe this article relies on more than a single source. I do not like to remove others requests from page, so if you agree with me and wish to remove the "single source" template it would make the article look better. If I am incorrect in requesting this from you please re-direct me to the person who added this request. Thank You. Reesrodgers (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not recall if I added that template there, but I second your notion to remove it and have done so. Thank you for improving upon that page and making this suggestion. I think that it would have also been good of you to be bold and remove it without consulting anyone because the article obviously no longer needed that template. Casdmo (talk) 19:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.Reesrodgers (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]