Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I have no clue what this is, but it is certainly not an article.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer is right, it is not an article. But it is a real life event that I heard of and if YOU ACTUALLY READ THE PARAGRAPHS YOU WOULD HAVE A CLUE! CyclePediao (talk) 21:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CyclePediao this website only hosts articles about notable topics fit for an encyclopaedia. We are not a blogging platform or a social media website. Please do not shout at reviewers. Qcne (talk) 14:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyclePediao! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pacific Ocean instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CyclePediao/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyclePediao. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wind And Rain, Kid Catastrophe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyclePediao. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pacific Ocean Analysis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I request for my article to be moved to my userspace. CyclePediao (talk) 00:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Storms By Year (not that accurate), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Devchar (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Storms in years (not 100% accurate), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. win8x (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CyclePediao, would you mind explaining why you are creating several articles with the same content? You can use your sandbox or Wikipedia:Sandbox instead. win8x (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:04, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Storms and stuff, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. win8x (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just noticed your page Storms in years (not 100% accurate), and while the article you made had effort put into it, it wasn't up to Wikipedia standards. I just wanted to direct you to some useful pages Help:Introduction, and Help:Your first article. Remember to cite sources for pretty much everything you make, too.

I also don't mean to discourage you, you seem enthusiastic about helping Wikipedia, but an article is a very large goal as a beginner, I've been editing for a while and I haven't made an article yet, maybe make smaller edits first to learn the ropes (you seem to already know how to work the editor, which is good), and work your way up to an article. Don't forget to ask questions if you need help at Teahouse.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you enjoy your stay!

P.S. An article doesn't need to be "approved" by a mod or dev, anybody can start an article, but it's recommended to start with a draft first. Thx56 (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storms by years and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We have several list articles of storms, if you wish to make a list article then you need to demonstrate the need and provide a criteria for the list. This almost just seems random.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storms by years and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 01:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Enough is enough. Stop wasting other people's time

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]