Hello, Dylanexpert! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dabomb87 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Dylan,

I'm afraid I can't really tell you much more than what I said on the peer review. I pretty much said everything useful I have to say! I honestly don't know whether the article should go from a C to a B as I am not really very familiar with what makes a C or B article. And, as I said at peer review, I am only just starting out my career as an article reviewer, so I am not very confident to make judgements at the moment.

However, I do understand that you want to get the article to featured status and I have been looking at featured article candidates the last couple of days. So the points I made at peer review remain important, but primarily it's the "reference every sentence" thing that will probably give you the most work. Have you looked around to see if the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films can give you feedback on how to improve the article?

In short, I wouldn't get too hung up on the B/C status. If I were in your shoes I would address the feedback you get at peer review and once you've done that put it forward for Featured Article status. I would normally say the next step would be to seek Good Article status, but the trouble is there is such a backlog there that you might miss your 100th anniversary deadline. If you put it forward for Featured and make sure you state your deadline and reasons for the deadline you might just get away with it :o)

Regards --bodnotbod (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dylanexpert. This is Olduch, also known as "Blah" at akirakurosawa.info. I just have some small suggestions for the Kurosawa article:

1. When you deleted the "Directorial approach" section you also deleted this photograph. I think we should keep that photo in the current article.

2. I think the title of this page should be "Major Criticisms" not "Summary of Major Criticisms."

3. According to Wikipedia's Manual of Style one should "Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest in lower case (Rules and regulations, not Rules and Regulations)." I was going to make the change for you, but decided I should let you know instead. I'm a bit reluctant to make sweeping changes to somebody else's work.

Cheers.--Olduch (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All your points are well taken. I will make all those changes. When we have completed all the sections and have cut the article to a reasonable length, I will request your additional feedback. Dylanexpert (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your weighing in with an opinion here: [1], thanks...Modernist (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axial1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. May I suggest that if you're going to swap photos out, don't take the ones that are there already and stack them? It's better if images for Kurosawa, or any article for that matter, are interspersed throughout the text to break up large portions of print – a daunting prospect for many readers. MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I anticipated your objection to stacking the photos. Unfortunately, both these photos come from the same time period -- in fact, the same year, 1957 -- as the top photo is from the set of Throne of Blood and the bottom one almost certainly from the set of The Lower Depths (because Isuzu Yamada, who appeared in the film, stands behind AK and the set in the background is clearly the flophouse set from that film). I don't want to lose either photo. At the same time, I don't want to put either of them in an inappropriate place in the article chronologically. If you know a way around this problem, let me know.

Dylanexpert (talk) 01:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem subbing in one photo for the next, if another photo is better. But what one must always keep in mind is your reader. Images help break up the text, aside from providing visual cues (linking text to images). Stacking photos in a large amount of text isn't helpful to the reader, and should be avoided. I'll take a look at it (not this evening), and see if there's a better solution. Also, the piece could use more graphics. Right now the text appears daunting. Take a look, for instance, at an article like Marshalsea. It may not appear to have much in common with a Japanese film director, but that piece addresses a complicated topic in an appealing visual way. The text is broken up, illustrated, and way more digestible. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:50, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken your advice. I have also added more graphics, so the page looks a lot better now. (Note: I have revised only up to and including the "International recognition" subsection of the "Life and Career" section; for subsequent sections, I intend to add even more graphics.) I have tried to contact user Raul654, though his Discussion page, to get him to look at my Kurosawa page and advise me about how to get the page as a Today's Featured Article on September 20, 2010, the anniversary of Rashomon's win at the Venice Film Festival, but so far he hasn't responded. Do you know how I get his attention? Thanks. Dylanexpert (talk) 16:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. The page is looking better, with the blocks of text broken up a bit for easier reading. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The piece is looking better still. I like what you're doing with the graphics. It's much easier to read now. And some nice images. MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to ignore your message. Am on something of a wikibreak right now. Will respond as soon as is feasible. MarmadukePercy (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a fantastic job on this article, but you really need to go through it with a sharp knife: the style and level of detail is more fitting for a biography than for an encyclopaedia article. I see you are cutting it in places, so I've resisted the temptation to get out my big axe, but if you need a hand then drop me a note. Yomangani^talk 08:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your praise. I was planning to contact you anyway. (I recognized the dogs on your talk page!) You have no idea what a sharp knife I've taken to this article already! It used to be over 170 KB long; now, it's less than 140 KB. The problem with AK is that all his 30 films are extant and available on home video, so I have no choice but to deal with all of them in the "Life and career" section. You call Wikipedia an encyclopedia, but I think of the major pages -- the ones about the really *big* subjects -- as a hybrid between an article and a monograph: you can summarize the subject, but also go into some detail about important things, like an artist's style, as I have, which you really can't do in a print encyclopedia. I think that is Wikipedia's glory! However, I've tried to be a good boy about shortening the article. I've moved all tables to other pages, and I am going to prepare one final page -- List of Awards and Honors -- so that I can eliminate the succession box with awards at the bottom of the current page. I may even eliminate the whole "Influences" subsection, though that would make me weep.

I would certainly welcome your specific suggestions on how to cut it. However, looking at Today's Featured Articles in the past, I notice that the Michael Jackson article (for example), which was a TFA only two months ago, is 180 KB long -- longer than my article was *before* I started cutting it -- and Kurosawa's career was much longer than Jackson's. (As indicated in the "Current standing" subsection, AK is listed as one of the Top Ten film directors of all time, so it can't be argued that Jackson was a more important figure in the history of music than AK was in the history of movies.) Also, I've been working on this project day and night for almost 10 weeks, and I'm just about done with it. I want to nominate it as a Featured Article (expedited), and then, if it gets in right away, put it as a candidate for the TFA for September 10, 2010, the 59th anniversary of Rashomon's victory at the Venice Film Festival, which opened world film markets to Kurosawa's (and Asian) cinema. An impossible dream? You be the judge! Dylanexpert (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dare look at the Michael Jackson article now! I agree that in Wikipedia you've got the space to expand all this interesting bits that you'd never have room for in a paper version, but you also have the facility to spread them out over sub-articles (which might then appeal to the readers that you hook with a shorter, punchier, main article). A lot more of this article would sit quite happily in sub-articles with a just summary here. The influences and working methods are prime examples - you have what could be a substantial, standalone article on both, but they are hidden far down the Kurosawa article where only the most diehard fans will reach. You might also consider moving some of the film production information to the relevant film articles and (even more) heavily summarising his life. If you think it is useful I could have a go at slimming it down on a copy in my userspace. Two sections that stand out in need of attention in the article at the moment are the "Kurosawa-gumi" list and "Kurosawa's reputation among fellow filmmakers" (which is essentially a list of quotes). As for FA, I think you'll be hard pushed to get it through by September 10 - it's not the small, neat type of article that breezes through in a few days, and even if you could manage it there is already an article with some support lined up for Sept 10. Yomangani^talk 17:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to FAC on Monday you'll hopefully get some feedback, so I'll hold off on cutting any more. I'm afraid that the sheer length will deter the casual FAC reviewers though, so you'll have to rely on a Japanese cinema enthusiast passing by. Yomangani^talk 00:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Akira_kurosawa_80s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it is too much of a hassle to argue this, I have deleted the image from my article and replaced it with a poster image. Dylanexpert (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. First of all, I'd like to personally thank you for putting so much work to considerably improve upon the Akira Kurosawa article. Kurosawa is one of my favorite directors, and I am quite glad that he now has a Wikipedia article worthy of his genius. The sheer amount of time and energy you've spent on this project is just staggering.

I would be honored to be credited as a proofreader.--Olduch (talk) 05:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Akira kurosawa 80s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on trying get this article up to featured level. I should point out you don't have to clear edits with other people on non-full protected articles, including those going through the featured article process, this would be anti-wikipedia and you shouldn't ask people to clear edits with you. In order to help you I would advise against canvassing, [2] as this is against the rules at featured article candidates. In terms of image stacking i think there might be different interpretations of what constitutes a stack. Good luck with the nomination. Tom B (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regard of not canvassing, you stated that "I would greatly appreciate it if you would go to the...candidates page and support the nomination of..." You have to keep the request at least neutral but it might be stricter than that, Tom B (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just to let you know, you don;t need to write me directly whenever you're responding to my comments on the Kurosawa FAC. I have that watchlisted and look at every addition to it, even those that don't bear directly on my observations. Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tora.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rashomon 1a.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem corrected. Dylanexpert (talk) 11:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Thanks for your message on my Talk page. Reading your most recent in the FAC itself, I believe you've mistaken Hammersoft and Hamiltonstone to be the same "Ham" opposer. You might want to revise your comment accordingly. Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dylanexpert. I note your recent edit summary: "I nominated the article and if I see fit to remove the image I will remove it." You don't own the article, and any editor is free to help improve it, including by removing images that they think do not assist the article and may violate WP policy. I am actually trying to help, by getting the debate focussed on the most significant images. I have also opened a thread for contributions on the article talk page. Please do not revert these image removals without first joining in that discussion. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tora1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kenichi Enomoto 1945a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:One Wonderful Sunday poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Samurai Mifune.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shimura1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axial2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ikiru-wipe2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ikiru-wipe3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axial3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axial1a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shichiroji standing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Akira Kurosawa Directing Lower Depths.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shichiroji kneeling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kurosawa with Sword.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Solid State Survivor (talk) 10:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ikiru-wipe1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Noriko1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you so much for "Late Spring". Aung Phyoe (talk) 13:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to look at this article in the near future. I've done some basic cleaning of the infobox and intro lines (removing overlinking, etc). Please post a note on the talk page of the Film Project, if you've not already done so. Lugnuts (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the film poster would be better in the infobox, than the screencap (I assume it's a screencap!) Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. All these little edits count in the end. One thing I noticed was a mis-match of the terms "film" and "movie" throughout the article. It should be film, and not movie, unless it's a direct quote from someone. I'll spend more time on this. Lugnuts (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dylanexpert, I see you that you have the above up for peer review and as such have recieved a number of comments from Tim riley, Crisco 1492 and some from myself. I also see that many of Tim's comments you have answered but as yet, have not indicated so on the PR archive page. You will need to answer these as other wise things could get very confusing. To indicate that the points have been addressed you can rule them off by using the following ... One day the sun came out and it was hot or simply say "fixed" or "done" etc (oh and remember to sign). If you knew this already just ignore me, and call me an interfering old so and so.  :-) -- Cassianto (talk) 11:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I have replied to Tim Riley's comments on his talk page and also, just now, on the PR archive page. I will respond to your suggestions within the next few days. Thanks. Dylanexpert (talk) 13:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hey. Thanks for responding but I just wanted to say there was no need for the "That may be unsatisfactory to you, but there it is" comment. If there's no information about the filming process then of course that is acceptable. You only needed to say so. Surely I can't have sounded so impossible to please?! The whole comment beginning " Also people, particularly young people, seem to assume about old films..." was also pretty patronising. I happen to be pretty knowledgeable on film history. And usually, production information has been uncovered about classic films. Anyway I keep having fairly negative experiences with my reviews and have lost the motivation to do it, so I'll probably just back out of the Late Spring FAC. I stand by my comments and think they would be a big improvement to the page (and to Ozu's), but I'll leave it up to you whether to implement them or not. Who knows, other editors may not have a problem with the current article - it's only my opinion. Good luck anyway. --Lobo (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry if I seemed too touchy about your comments. I didn't mean to sound patronizing. Some reviewers have made me feel very defensive, so perhaps I was reacting to that, but you have been extremely gracious, and my replies to your comments indicate that I plan to follow most of your thoughtful suggestions. You have been very helpful and constructive and I thank you for that. Dylanexpert (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's okay, thanks. --Lobo (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheri Honkala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independence Mall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize for bothering you. As you have created List of awards and honors given to Akira Kurosawa and you specialize in Japanese cinema, I would have liked to ask you if you have more information regarding the 'Million Pearl Award' of the Roei Association in Tokyo (its name in Japanese, websites with the list of recipients etc.). One of the films I'm working on here got the prize, so I'm searching for the details. I hope you can help me. Thank you very much anyway. Bahavd Gita (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything I can do to help? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will let you know. Dylanexpert (talk)

Thanks for creating The Solutions Project, Dylanexpert!

Wikipedia editor Skamecrazy123 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

As the page is still under construction. I am happy to mark it as reviewed for now. If there are any problems with it once it has been finished, I can sort them out when/if they arise --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Skamecrazy123's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylanexpert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylanexpert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert edits without providing a reason, either on the talk page or by edit summary. Quis separabit? 22:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your changes. You need to read over WP:OTHERSTUFF. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylanexpert! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your many edits at the Kurosawa article. After the GA passed for the article, I have nominated it as an FA candidate and thought to ask if you could stop by once in a while at the assessment page and possibly leave comments as might be needed from time to time given your strong experience in editing Kurosawa's biography. The current article could not have taken its present shape without your many helpful edits. JohnWickTwo (talk) 00:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice of you to make those changes for Kurosawa which I am supporting. There has been a final call from sysops at FAC for final support and oppose indications if you have a chance to visit the FAC page. JohnWickTwo (talk) 23:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Drunken-Angel-1a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mike Justin and Alissa.jpeg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work contained within this image, you will need to specify

1. the creator of the original work
2. the copyright status of the original work, usually indicated by adding a licensing tag. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the image in the article. There should be no problem now. Dylanexpert (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Michael Semanchik.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mike Justin and Alissa.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Reggie Cole Brian Banks Steve Edwards and Mike Semanchik on Good Day LA.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alissa Bjerkhoel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylanexpert. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Michael Semanchik, Dylanexpert!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-written article which is a useful addition to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Albertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Framed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rare Beer Club, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) This sourcing must be used to prove notability under Wikipedia's gudelines for companies and products. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you would have looked carefully (or looked at all) at the article I created, you would have noticed that I had put an "Under Construction" tag at the top of the page. May I ask what you don't understand: the "under" part or the "construction" part? For me, and I think for most of the Wikipedia world, the "Under Construction" tag clearly means, "This is a work in progress and I'm working on this: back off till I'm done!" In other words, the fact is understood that it's often impossible for an editor to create an entire article complete with references at a single sitting, and so needs time to do the job right. So the tag is there to tell people like you NOT to mess with the editor's work until he or she removes the tag and is thus ready to present the article to the Wiki world for review. You wrote, "An article you recently created... does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published." But the article can't "remain" published because it wasn't really published in the first place: it was just in the process of getting published.

Secondly, you may have noticed the presence (if you'd bothered to look) of many numbers in brackets in my text. Those are the code numbers for the references I had intended to insert when I had time to finish it. So I had those references all planned and was waiting to get to it when you decided to move my article into draft space without the slightest warning.

Lastly, if you had bothered to check my contributions history, or for that matter, this talk page, before you wrote what you included above about sourcing, you would have known that I've been an editor for many years and know all about sourcing and inserting references, and am not some beginner who's completely ignorant of the topic. In fact, I had put several references in the lede section before you moved it which were designed to show that I know what I'm doing. However, I'm not Superman, and I can't do five hours' work in two any more than you can, so why didn't you give me a chance to finish my work, wait until I removed the tag and then review it?

If I sound annoyed, I am. I don't know if I can work in draftspace, since I've never used it before. But if I have problems, I will come to you to fix them for me. Dylanexpert (talk) 02:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Simpson (attorney), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page California Proposition 66 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Dylanexpert (talk) 11:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rare Beer Club. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rare Beer Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Beer Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylanexpert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I will cut to the chase. Do you have any direct connection to the people you write about? Your additions to QuisLex included a lot of promotional material, such as the use of "award winning" in the first sentence. This is a textbook example of WP:PEACOCK, and combined with some of your other changes, this prompted me to look at your other contributions. I am concerned that you may have a conflict of interest, or are being compensated for your edits. If you are paid, you must disclose this, per WP:PAID. If not, you may still have a conflict of interest, and I encourage you to look over Wikipedia:Conflict of interest if you haven't already. Please respond here at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is QuisLex. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has been brought to my attention that I need to post this fact, I am currently being compensated by QuisLex for editing their article.

I will strive to maintain a NPOV and avoid COI problems, and would appreciate constructive help by editors in achieving this goal. Thank you.Dylanexpert (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The place to declare your compensation is on your User page, not buried on your talk page. However, your connection is clearly described at the Talk page for QuisLex, so you are covered. David notMD (talk) 02:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As is mentioned at the COI noticeboard and elsewhere, QuisLex is not the only paid article. Per Wikipedia's policies, and per common practice, every paid article should be clearly disclosed, regardless of age or specific circumstances. I suggest adding a list to User:Dylanexpert, or near the top of this talk page. Both the letter and spirit of WP:PAID calls for transparency. Consolidating all of this information into a single, prominent place would be a demonstration of good faith. Considering that this has been going on for at least a year, if not more, I do not think this is an unreasonable expectation. Grayfell (talk) 03:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to put all the information in when I have time. Please be patient.

Dylanexpert (talk) 04:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing this. I sincerly appreciate it.

While this may seem like a minor point, please be aware that all edits to articles made on behalf of someone else for compensation must be disclosed, not just to a client's specific article. Therefore, edits to California Western School of Law on behalf of CIP (for example) would also qualify, and would also need to be disclosed.

Please clarify whether or not you were compensated to edit Sophie Cruz. That article had a COI tag added shortly before you began editing there, and your contributions included WP:PEACOCK and WP:WEASEL problems.

Likewise, please clearly indicate if you were paid to edit Arlene Hutton, which has many similar issues.

Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audrey McGinn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey McGinn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dylanexpert! You created a thread called How do I request a neutral editor to review several completed articles and how can their neutrality be ensured? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Nibroc Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/2499/4312. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Interstellarity (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another user, Phil Bridger, discovered that there was absolutely no connection between the document whose copyright Interstellarity was claiming was infringed and my article, and reversed Interstellarity's tag. When Mr. Bridger pointed this out to Interstellarity, the latter claimed not to recall that he had placed the tag on my article and another one, though he had done so only a few hours earlier! Interstellarity appeared to acknowledge the error and promised to be "more careful." Wikipedia keeps getting weirder and weirder!

Dylanexpert (talk) 22:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynne Serpe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynne Serpe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sal2100 (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]