Hi EMT. Thanks for fixing Bigg City Port. You might be interested in The League of Copyeditors, which is looking for new members. Rintrah 04:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the LoC, EMT. It's great to have you on board, and I'm looking forward to working with you. We have a mountain of work to do, and your help is very much appreciated. Trusilver 07:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sharkface217 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Sharkface217 05:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Wikipedia:Notability (people) article, one of the criteria for inclusion is a "A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following" and "Name recognition" all of which Dreadhead has in the Indianapolis Colts community. The Dreadhead appears in the team's opening video, in the program and on the big screen as "AAA - Fan of Game," in addition to his weekly occurences on the big screen in RCA Dome. In the Indianapolis community, the Dreadhead has been recognized on countless occasions, and in his former college community of Muncie, IN. He has also appeared on several Colts Caravan promotional tour stops, recognizable as such.

Sources will be placed, but in your desperation to delete, the page hasn't existed long enough for me to provide them.

Try looking at this story where he is quoted: http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4837613

"Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this." Don't tell us to come here to ask questions and not show up. You deleted the article and yet you refuse to answer questions about it?

Nice to see that even after a month, no response. NICE. Way to go. You're AWESOME! -- User:Oshaberi 09:33, 27 December 2006

Happy New Year! The Law Enforcement Wikiproject wishes all it's members a happy New Year! SGGH 09:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving me a warning that have listed Runestone U 29 for speedy deletion as "patent nonsense". There are many runestone articles on WP, and this runestone tells the story of a family. It is notable enough to have an exposition at a museum in Stockholm[1].--Berig 17:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A simple look into Category:Runestones would have told you that the article is not "patent nonsense", that Wikipedia has lots of articles like it, and that if you do want to have them deleted, you'd need to start some major campaign to rephrase policy. I've removed the speedy deletion tag for you. regards, dab (𒁳) 17:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, your many userboxes led me to believe you were a veteran editor (in spite of the "NEW" one). I did not want to sound rude, and the scanning of new articles you are doing is important work indeed, Wikipedia does get a lot of nonsense additions. It's just that in this particular case, the article clearly doesn't meet speedy deletion criteria, and is very unlikely to pass even a full deletion vote. You are still free to add it to WP:AfD of course, although I recommend you do not. regards, and keep up the good work, dab (𒁳) 18:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, about your tagging of Vincent tulio laconte and Travis Veracka as nonsense articles and the subsequent warnings issued to the article creators... these are not nonsense articles, but should instead be tagged as {{db-bio}} and article creators should be left a note with {{nn-warn}}. -- Gogo Dodo

I note you've deleted the opening line ("Cad Operator [...] is a civilian staff position within London's Metropolitan Police Service.") from an article (Cad Operator) I created recently when breaking up Metcall into more digestible chunks. I've reverted this, as without this context the article makes no sense.

I've left your {{copyedit}} tag on the article in case I've missed something - however, I'm not quite sure why you've put it there - the article's a deliberate stub (its sole point was to stop it cluttering up the main Metcall article, and the only links to it are from the two other pieces of the original article - Metcall & Contact Handling System); it's drawn from a single non-contentious source (the MPS's own website); while it's uncited this is purely because it's a recently split article and the references are on the 'parent' article; it contains no spelling or grammatical mistakes. Additionally, almost all the text in this article was cut-&-pasted from the parent article, where no-one appears to have had any problems with it. Am I missing something obvious? Iridescenti 19:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Perdikkas" is a variant spelling of "Perdiccas." The spelling with k's is used by Mary Renault in her books on Alexander the Great. By all means delete Perdikkas, but please leave a redirect (I would do it myself if I knew how to do it) for the benefit of people who read Renault, and people who have read about Perdikkas in the original Greek. Thank you very much. Erudil 16:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

This is in reply to the message in my talk page, under the subtitle "Baptism of Jesus," just before "Perdikkas/Perdiccas." This is irrelevant by now. The redirect is already in place. But I thought it only civil to answer your latest message. Thank you. Erudil 16:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear League member,

We've started a participation drive for the remainder of February. If you can, please help clear the backlog by adopting the following goals each week:

• Select an article to copy-edit from the backlog. After your copy-edit, list the article in the articles ready for final proofread section.
• Select a different article to proofread from the articles ready for final proofread section.

Thanks for your help! BuddingJournalist 08:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EMT1871. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Emerlight.gif) was found at the following location: User:EMT1871. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You recently removed the tag on this page stating that it has naught to do with law enforcement, but it does. I am a Canadian MP, so knowing this sort of thing does make a difference. Please check more carefully next time. :( Dreamy 19:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 22:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to give you a plate of cookies for being a Wikipedian. I hope your Wikistress gets better! I hope your Wikibreak goes well, and you come back happy! :) Peace, Neranei 23:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I was wondering if you could take the time to copyedit Lethbridge. It is a FAC and most of the complaints now are regarding copyediting. I've done the best I can, but I've been staring at this article for so long, my head is spinning. Thank you very much for your consideration. :) --Kmsiever 16:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well i wouldn't say its incorrect, its just a little one word difference really. Long Pond is also the name of the road that runs along the lake, so thats probably why I added it like that. I actually work as a lifeguard at another camp across from the girl scouts on this lake too, so Im pretty sure I know what the area is called.

I'm sorry if this is more serious then it seems. I really haven't been that active on this site. BareNakedMike 22:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay dude. Whatever makes you happy. BareNakedMike —Preceding comment was added at 06:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

League of Copyeditors roll call

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

I saw that you rated my article a bit ago, I have done SOME improvements to it and added some pictures (and looking for more), was wondering what you would suggest next? Regards --Hourick (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EMT1871. Seeing as the Arkansas gubernatorial succession is the same as the Massachusetts gubernatorial succession? Shouldn't Jim Guy Tucker be listed as Acting Governor December 1992 to January 1995, then Governor January 1995 to July 1996. Mike Huckabee as Acting Governor July 1996 to January 1999; then Governor January 1999 to January 2007? PS- Would you respond at those respective articles. GoodDay (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just looking for anybody, who can straighten out the Arkansas Governors. Nobody at Wikipedia: WikiProject US Governors has returned my calls. I contacted you on the assumption that you were knowledgable on the Governors in the USA. Also, if Arkansas lawes are like Massachusetts? Riley was 'never' Governor. GoodDay (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 17, 2008 is not St. Patrick's Day. See the lead of St. Patrick's Day. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for telling me that, I thought that the bank was on the Carmel side of the border, since it's very close to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forever88 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on a moment, Section 11 states "Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." I don't work for Lake, but I do install these systems and they're a bugger to find information upon in a concise way. Plus I've just spent the last hour only for you to tag them for speedy deletion! Please re-consider this! Cyberprog (talk) 15:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Im Vincent LaRocca, and have my entry to wikipedia marked for quick deletion. It was never my intent to self promote, only to add a piece of medical marijuana political history to wikipedia. I apologize for any infraction I might have done while trying to do this.

I do have a personal interest in petertrial.com, after it expired I was disappointed it became used for financial gain as opposed of that of it's original purpose, to shed light on medical marijuana issues. So I bought the domain name with the purpose of restoring back to original purpose

I have since deleted any references to myself or the new website --Vlaroc (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)----[reply]

1. REDIRECT PeterTrial.com

PeterTrial.com Instances of Notability,Significance,Validity ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]} Check out the new website, and you'll see it's not designed for personal or company promotion, only the promotion of a memorial to Peter McWilliams, continuing his crusade. PeterTrial.com --Vlaroc (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlaroc (talk • contribs) 19:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand a word that message said. Can you explain it a little better. The only thing i understood was How to talk to you.

ElementalDraco218 (talk) 01:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there EMT1871,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.

Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Mifter (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though I feel this message will be disregarded as it attacks such a large portion of the Wikipedia basis, I wish to file this complaint over the deletion of the Trigger120 article. I feel that though an encyclopedia may contain notable articles, I also feel that many encyclopedias (at least of the type that I occasionally reference) also contain articles of an obscure nature and that it is unfair to judge something at first glance as unimportant or not notable because maybe to you it is not, however, to other members of the internet community who wish to search for such a topic as (for instance) was posted, clearly they would not have searched it in the first place if not for the reason that they thought it to be of some importance. The article in question did have a reasonable citation and some amount of effort and time put into it which was removed within seconds of its creation because the article was not important to you, thus waisting my time, and frustrating members of the internet community who might have wanted to search for such an article because of it's relevance to them selfs or their community. To the best of my knowledge, many encyclopedias contain information which one may not be interested in, however, it would not have been placed there if not because it had some note or merit for someone. Also, because this is an internet database/encyclopedia, it would seem that regardless of its importance, unless of course it is written solely for the amusement of one person, that it should remain included in the database. To further remove extraneous articles, a reasonable idea to me, would be to place said article in a trail time period during which if it does not receive a predetermined number of hits, it is then removed on basis of being "not notable enough", however until such a time as that test is complete it should remain online for the internet community to decide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponx (talk • contribs) 01:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

under the circumstances I still stand by my original statement, however I recognize that the deletion was not your fault, and to further clarify, my previous statement is not to be so much of an attack as a suggested way to reorganize the existing system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponx (talk • contribs) 01:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I do not feel that my article was an advertisement of any sort. I have distributed music to many other people on a local level and have, as pointed out in the article, uploaded several of my albums and allow them to be downloaded for free. I would think that advertisements with intent to sell an item to a person should be deleted, and clearly this is not the case here, although it still technically would be defined as an advertisement. In concurrence with your statement, but with a bit of a twist let me pose the question: What better way to get your name out there then through a free information site? Also, because of the obscurity of the name, it would seem a poor way to advertise because one would have to enter the name of the band and it seems to me unlikely that someone would do so unwittingly. Not to carry the argument further.. whats done is done. At least, thank you for listening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponx (talk • contribs) 02:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may be confused. I didn't create that article; I put an AFD notice on it. — Gwalla | Talk 03:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oak Bay Police Department, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? KenWalker | Talk 17:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that telling people to go to an article to 'help keep it' as you did here may be considered a violation of WP:CANVASS. Advising interested parties of a discussion is fine, telling them how to vote is generally not. Thanks. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 21:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from my talk page because it's been archived already) Why did you put a speedy deletion tag on my Udser page??EMT1871 (talk) 11:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A user put a speedy deletion tag on a userbox of his that you were using. Since you were the only one using the userbox, I substed it, and then removed the speedy tag before deleting the userbox. Sorry for the inconvenience. –xenocidic (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Pee Tern/Naming conventions (law enforcement agency categories) which WP:LE has put together. We don't double categorise articles; because Category:Municipal police departments of New York is a sub category of Category:Municipal police departments of the United States, articles only go into the first category. ninety:one 19:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]