Epstein Files Full PDF

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Afronurus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mesetaornis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. harrz ^talk 19:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Element10101 T ~ C 00:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lydekker's pangolin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. harrz ^talk 20:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches in Fauquier County, Virginia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It can be deleted; there's no need for it right now since new info shows that the former sole page of the category was incorrectly placed there. Element10101 AIW WPI TOLT ~ C 19:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the note you left Idioporus (I moved it to the genus title following WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA) about trying to include a synonym for the family. There really isn't any standardized way to present synonyms at different ranks with a monotypic taxon (there definitely aren't any special taxobox parameters for synonyms at different ranks). You can find some examples of how other editors have dealt with genus and species synonyms in a monotypic genus with this search (note that the search is explicitly searching for "synonyms = Genus"; there are many more articles with genus+species synonyms that might present them in ways that the search won't pick up (e.g., using a template such as {{collapsible list}}).

In the case of Idioporus, I think it is sufficient to just mention Idioporini the body of the article; trying to explain that Idioporini is a differently ranked synonym of Idioporidae in the synonyms parameter of the taxobox is just going to be awkward.

Also, your use of "display_parents=2" wasn't doing anything. 2 ranks up was family, which always displays anyway, and any use of |grandparent_authority= automatically makes whatever is 2 ranks up display even if it wouldn't normally. I set display_parents to 5 in order to display all the ranks between family and order. Plantdrew (talk) 23:48, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you! I originally created the article for Idioporidae, but realized it was monotypic, so changed the page title to Idioporus affinis without fixing the {{{display_parents}}} parameter. Element10101 AIW WPI TOLT ~ C 23:55, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Katie^talk 14:37, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:Ambox/sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I know it's a sandbox, but it is transcluded in multiple places, so it needs to be edited carefully. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also {{Db/sandbox}}. At least leave an edit summary when you do something potentially disruptive like this. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMONNAME does not mean "move an article about an organism to a title that is not its scientific name", and it absolutely doesn't mean "move an article about an organism to ANY title that is not its scientific name". COMMONNAME says Wikipedia "generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources)". For most organisms, there isn't any English common name/vernacular name. Most organisms that have a vernacular name have more than one (with some of those being coined by biologists by translating a scientific name into English, but never used by the general public). There are a very small number of organisms that have a single vernacular name that is well recognized by the general public.

Counts of search engine reported results (a WP:GOOGLETEST) are pretty flawed, but in my experience, they overreport counts for vernacular names more than they do for scientific names. Vernacular names mentioned in Wikipedia articles about organisms may not include all of the vernacular names, nor indicate which are most commonly used.

Based on an inherently flawed GOOGLETEST, Silurus meridionalis is probably better known as Chinese large-mouth catfish than Yangtze catfish, the title you had moved it to, but is not generally known by any vernacular name over the scientific name.

And Podarcis virescens would probably be better known as green Iberian wall lizard than Geniez's wall lizard (a straight translation of the scientific name that is less descriptive of its range and color).

Please stop moving articles on organisms from their scientific names. If you think COMMONNAME favors vernacular name title for organisms (please look at WP:PRECISION and WP:CONSISTENT), do some research to determine what vernacular name might be the COMMONNAME. Plantdrew (talk) 03:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Anthony J. Cobos indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Matthew L. Murdoch indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Hayden R. Davis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Element10101. Thank you for your work on Behrnsville. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:20, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]