Welcome to Footyfanatic3000's talk page

					]	]
Home	Talk	E-Mail	Sandbox	Contributions	Edit Count	Logs	Userspace

Archives

2009 threads /Current

remember...

It is approximately 5:27 AM where this user lives.

Hello, Footyfanatic3000. You have new messages at Kavs8's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm sorry to say I'm deeply confused by your actions, if you have no problem with the edit why are you reverting? Surely the common sense thing to do would to self revert so you can get on to proper editing instead of whatever point it is you're trying to prove now?Zenne (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another Wikipéire sock. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 22:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added your suggested picture to the Ireland portal. Thanks for a great suggestion, --89.100.245.211 (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 22:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Founder, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Founder and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Founder during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that people dont see this a seperate devision but the fact is that Aer Lingus Regional from 28/03/10, is nothing to do with Aer Lingus just paying fee's for using the Aer Lingus brand it is a subsidry GIVE IT TIME!!! --Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 18:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already said, it is a franchise agreement between Aer Arann and Aer Lingus. Not a separate airline. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 19:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How Long does it usually take for a final outcome on afd.

How are the routes not begining as such? http://www.ryanair.com/ie/news/7-summer-sun-routes-from-cork-at-unbeatable-prices they are new?? brand new routes i have reverted your edit read the article 7 new Summer routes. --Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 15:57, 02 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I have now checked and found out that they actually are new routes, instead of one of Ryanair's promotional tricks. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 16:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i suppose that's what everyone expects from Ryanair, i suppose in due corse they will make a PR stunt pulling out all together from Cork. --Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 16:03, 02 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol sure of course they will! Like they practically did with Shannon :) --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 19:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ive heard their planning to keep the Cork-Alicante, Faro & Malaga services to a year-round basis operating from those bases thou, and their planning to re-enter talks with Shannon bargining Cork off each other like e.g. saying if you dont want these aircraft and new routes will move them to Cork but i people are saying also that they will keep the 2 ac at Cork - RYANAIR GUARANTEED not to like irish Airports! ha:) --Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 23:06, 02 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kavs8 (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)==Thomson Airways== No all scheduled flights from Dublin & Shannon by Thomson are on the irish website for e.g. [1] thanks!!:)--Kavs8 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 15:34, 03 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well i cant believe i was wrong i simply under estimated Ryanair! they've dropped KIR-FAO for this winter (previously bookable), SNN-AGP (not bookable) and have introduced ORK-FAO, ORK-AGP & ORK-ACE for this winter!! at CORK! they really do no how to suprise people ha? Kavs8 (talk) 17:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi im just wondering how do semi-protect Cork Airport?Kavs8 (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only administrators can semi-protect articles. Seeing as neither of us are administrators we have to request a semi-protection. This can be done at WP:PADLOCK. We must give a reason why the article should be semi-protected (in this case, vandalism), and then they will decide whether to semi-protect it or not. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 21:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i want to semi-protect do you want to notify an adminstrator?Kavs8 (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I would like to notify an administrator as I'm sick and tired of all the vandalism, but it's a bit late now so I'll do it tomorrow. Then we'll see what they say :) --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 23:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any update?Kavs8 (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just requested the semi-protection! Will let you know when I get a result :) --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 22:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Footyfanatic3000. You have new messages at Kavs8's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi - Do you know what hoilday company are using Primera Air flights to Bourgas and Larnaca because the only compamy with I can find is Concorde Travel and Budget Travel which used these routes last year but Concorde Travel have no updated the timetable for 2010. Europe Airpost have taken over the Bourgas flights while Eurocypria Airlines have taken over the Larnaca flights for Concorde Travel for summer 2010. ?? Jamie2k9 (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Actually I'm just after realising that I was wrong. I thought that Concorde were using these routes this year, but I was actually looking the 2009 timetable. Will remove them immediately. Thanks. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 10:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiUserboxer Award
		For achievement in creating a whole hockey-sock of new Airbus usersboxes. - Ahunt (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note - no problem - you are doing good work there! - Ahunt (talk) 17:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,

Meine Freundin und ich habe einen B & B in Lettermacaward wir lieben diese Landschaft und die Menschen. Deshalb habe ich eine Website für diesen Ort gemacht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn jemand könnte einen Link auf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lettermacaward legte um http://lettermacaward.info.

Danke tausendmal

Lupus

And now, i try in english.

Hello,

My girl friend and I have a B & B in Lettermacaward, we love this landscape and the people. Therefore, I made a website for this place. We would be happy if somebody could put a link on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lettermacaward to http://lettermacaward.info.

Thanks a thousand times

Lupus I hope I have written on the right place? ;-)

Mail: postfach@lupusdw.de http://de.teknopedia.teknokrat.ac.id/wiki/Benutzer:Lupusverlach —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.178.81.233 (talk) 06:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the link to the page as it seems useful. Vielen Dank! :-) --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 13:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erst mal vielen Dank dafür.

Ich habe dich als mein Opfer ausgesucht. Kannst Du mein Mentor in der Englischen Wikipedia sein?

First of many thanks.

You are now my victims :-) Can you be my mentor in the English Wikipedia?

--Lupusverlach (talk) 07:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, why not?! --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 17:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which policy were you enforcing using TW in your latest edit on British Isles please? Thanks. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked into this more and it appears that British Isles has 1RR Protection against reverts of reverts and you reverted in that way, also using TW which is not meant to be used for good-faith edit reverts. Can you please go back and remove your revert? Thanks for your help. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I've left an answer on the talk page. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 17:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Footyfanatic3000. You have new messages at User:TFOWR/Thankspam.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 21:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments here. Only an occasional thought for now though. --RA (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, going for adminship needs some thought! --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 00:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Footyfanatic. I'd just like to point out that you have doubled up on one of the diffs in this sockpuppet investigation. I suspect one of them should have been a different diff. Cheers. Jack forbes (talk) 11:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million, I've fixed it now --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 11:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Jack forbes (talk) 11:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey footieboy, you seem a very astute sort of person, can you tell the nonce who protected the sockpuppet page that I can't defend myself over there. Anyway, I think they'll let me off on this one occasion but I'd still like to make my case. SpongerJack (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Come on now, it's all too obvious who you are. I hope that this is not the start of a long string of socks...

Anyway what I'll do is I'll copy your comments on the talk page to your SPI page. The page was locked for a reason. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 22:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. SpongerJack (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the point of that was, but I think we all get the message so could that be the end of it please? RashersTierney (talk) 20:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but my internet connection is currently very slow, and therefore I thought the edit didn't go through first time. I didn't intend to post the message twice. --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 20:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twice' - it must have gone through at least 4 times. I'd state your technical difficulties there just in case it's misinterpreted as harassment. RashersTierney (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I've already done that. Edit conflicts didn't help either! --Footyfanatic3000 ^{(talk  · contribs)} 21:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a poll taking place here on whether or not to extend the ArbCom binding resolution, which says there may be no page move discussions for Ireland,Republic of Ireland or Ireland (disambiguation), for a further two years. Fmph (talk) 21:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]