Hi Frashid01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Note that you didn't quite do the links properly here. If you put a [[ ]] around anything it will automatically generate a link internally to Wikipedia. So you should have put those brackets around the titles of these pages.

• Finance: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finance I chose this article because I felt that the readability could be improved with general editing, and it needs revision with its citations.
  • I'm surprised to find that this is a really good article for his project. The organization and writing, especially in the history section need some work. Note that it is a branching article that links out to a lot of subpages (as it should), so some of the work that needs to be done is thinking about what information should go where in relation to these sub pages. A challenge, but a good one.
• Zou People: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zou_people I chose this article because it needs to be edited for readability, and is lengthy enough to where substantial improvements can be made.
  • There are some complexities with this article, but it might work. You'd have to carefully think about the WP:NOT issues and how this information is best organized to help and you'd want to be careful to work with the community who might be around.
• Nicholas Tolstoy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Tolstoy I chose this article because all of its information is listed underneath one section. I think this page would benefit from being edited so that information is more clearly organized and easier to read through.
  • This is a great one. It needs to be converted into a readable, appropriate form.
• Forestry in Russia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forestry_in_Russia I chose this article because it has a specific tag at the top of the page that states it requires copyediting. The page is not organized as well as it could be, and needs a consistent tone throughout.
  • This article is more general mess. It might be a bit of a problem that it doesnt quite have enough citations. You might need to do a pretty strong hack into this to really get it moving along.
• Weather Warfare: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_warfare I chose this article because it is tagged for being written like an essay; it needs heavy edits in tone in order for it to be presented as an encyclopedic article. It also needs light grammatical edits and needs to be organized better.
  • Another big task and I'm not sure how much can be salvaged. You'd have to push the article into a better form for future editing.

All of your articles are very big challenges, with more or less difficulty in getting them to rolling in a better direction. I'll go ahead and put the ones that are do-able in the WikiEdu dashboard and you can grab them there but we should plan on talking these through next week or so. Know that all of them need a LOT more than just editing for tone. You'll have to be bold here!Etherfire (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frashid01, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]