Hello, Freepressinc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Carta Magnifica., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! smileguy91^talk 23:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Carta Magnifica. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 23:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC) deleting real content is an assult on the articles integrety![reply]

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Christianophobia and anti-Christian sentiment because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Tentinator  19:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think constructive is not the issue here, informative off a serious issue is an issue here! where could people vind information on christianophobia? if not on this site? besides if this paragraph is biast, the the article on izlamaphobia is biast too, because it was an almost copy and paste copy of the article on izlamaphobia! if you remove this one, you have to remove the other one too! lets work with only one set of standard will we?

Hello Freepressinc, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Anti-Christian sentiment has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

I used the material from izlamaphobia as a BASIS!!!! I changed the wording as so not to enfringe on copy right. So stop removing it because it is NOT BIAST en it IS NOT copy right because I changed the wording, but the material applies!!!! so stop harassing! ps. it is only a small amount I corporated, besides I changed the wording a bit. Does any one actually read it before they delete stuff? or do most not bother reading it and just delete it because they have not written it?

The copyvio was from [1] (we can ignore any copyvio from our article at the moment). Changing a few words doesn't mean you are not in violation of our policy on copyright. You are also clearly trying to promote the Templar micronation. You have been reverted by 4 editors (3 with accounts and one IP). Please read WP:Edit warring as you are likely to be blocked if you continue to try to force your edits in - you need to get agreement on the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Freepressinc, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Anti-Christian sentiment has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. same copyvio as before. You are also trying to promote your Templar church and trying to force in your views against consensus. Dougweller (talk) 12:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Religious text may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Compare [[Max Müller]]'s statement "the hymns men of the Rig-Veda are said to date from 1500 B.C." ('Veda and Vedanta', 7th lecture in ''India: What Can It Teach Us: A Course of Lectures Delivered

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the Templar Church to the article. Wikia is not a reliable reference ([{WP:RS]]). Only reliable referenced material can be added. Also, having Templar Church be a real church would help. Bgwhite (talk) 08:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]