Hello, GasSnake or Poison Oak! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! RJaguar3 | u | t 04:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please note that all viral marketing techniques must be verified via reliable sources that they are in fact part of the studio's marketing strategy. Right now, the link you are providing has not been verified. The same goes for the information about the dollars. All information must be cited reliably, or it is subject to removal.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Dark Knight (film). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use talk pages such as The Dark Knight (film) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By Wikipedia standards, the information is not verifiable. By my standards (which do not come into play in editing), I think it's likely to be true, though I have some lingering doubts. If you've ever followed Cloverfield, you'd be aware that there were quite a few fake websites that were purported to be for the film, when this was not the case. So I am personally not sure about the site, but by Wikipedia standards, it can't be included without a reliable source. Also, if you really want to talk about Batman, I would check out IMDb or BOF. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Dark Knight (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey outta curiosity

where'd you find the scanulation you used for all the info for the 666 Satan page???

i've yet to find a dependable website for 666 Satan and it's really startin to annoy me

peace, Ancientanubis, talk 07:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, GasSnake or Poison Oak! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 03:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. AntiSpamBot 03:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Devilsummoning.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

hey man, i really respect the work you've been doing on the 666 Satan pages

but ya got to understand that there are rules and protocol that go along with making some of the HUGE edits you've been doing

such as using the correct tags when you upload images, AND when uploading images to cite the author, chapter and page that you got it from

ALSO

when doing huge revamps of articles to discuss them with other frequent editors under the talk pages of the article it's self, or with the editors directly

if you have any problems/questions please feel free to message me back

thanks, -Ancientanubis, talk 02:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also, man i'm sorry i had to revert all the work you've done, really i am.... but you got to understand that when i started work on the 666 Satan page it looked like this(don't edit that, its a page from the history of the article) and i've sense expanded it into what it is today with the help of a few friends and other editors who pop in here and there, so in a sense i take some personal pride in how the page looks

BUT on the other hand you also have to understand that as an article it needs to be organized and easily readable, and the way it was looking it was a bit of a jumbled mess at certain parts of it, if we want this page to be the best it can be then we need to work to find places for specific sections by deciding what we're going to write prior to putting it in, deciding where it will go and or if there will be a pictorial representation of what is being discussed, i mean, i am perfectly fine with what you are wanting to include into the article but we just need to find a good place to put it, and also get it so it sounds like a very well educated and well thought out entry(no offense to your writing, i mean hell half the stuff i write @ first makes no sense, its only because of my friends and peers am i able to pass it off as a respectable entry), thanks tho...Ancientanubis, talk 02:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the title says, this is your first, last, and only warning. Please immediately cease all your erroneous, spam, and POV edits of things relating to 666 Satan. 666 Satan is an article with the purpose of providing a legitimate resource for the manga of the same name. Your edits included the reformatting of articles, which resulted in display errors; Replacing images with your own which were either off-site and/or not correctly sourced with an adequate license, and spam as identified above by User:AntiSpamBot. In addition, you went ahead of your own prerogative to make these edits without gaining a general consent through the talk pages of the respective articles affected which includes, but is not limited to: 666 Satan and List of characters in 666 Satan. Once again, please cease these edits else I will be forced to report you to the AIV. Thank You. Evilgohan2 03:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not post the above because of a violation of the 3 Revision Rule. I did so because of exactly what I stated. Ranting to me and posting racist material on my page is not going to garner any civility in the matter and in fact, pisses me off. You asking me who the hell I am, well, allow me to retort. Wikipedia, as many know, is a community driven effort. My warning issued is for the aforementioned edits. Now then, if you do not wish to be civil (And judging from another comment left on my talk page as well as various responses from other persons) I will be less than hesitent to hit the report button in the top right corner of my screen, courtesy of TWINKLE. Evilgohan2 07:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1st off... when respondin to a message on someones wall be sure to include it under a new topic or somethin.... that way its easy for people to respond/find your post... also which person were you talking about in your post?...Ancientanubis, talk 03:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, now that comment really pisses me off, on average i work 14-15 hours a day, i wake up every morning at 6am to be at work at 7pm and usually dont get off work till 9 or 10pm, and the only time i am online is from about 9 or 10 untill about 1 when i go 2 bed, so dont fucking give me shit about the fact that you dont want 2 listen to people who spend 3/4 of there day on here, also there are certain rules/policys that we as editors are required to follow on wikipedia... and if you dont want 2 follow them then you wont be editing for long, that much i can guarantee you.... so basically your with the system or w/o the system....Ancientanubis, talk 03:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well prior to you making an assumption because of a decision i made(if you want to read my discussion on this read this talk page, prior to my friend looking at this all i was going to do was discuss it, but he recommended that i report it, so i did... and wall i really did with vegas was send him the info and let him make the decisions for his self.... plus, as i said, i take personal pride/attention to these pages because of the fact that 99.9% of these pages are all my own work, so as long as your major edits such as adding huge amounts of information that is mostly unverified, it will be removed, Ancientanubis, talk 03:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my policy for most of this page has been to expand what we already have compared to constantly adding new information, so if you want to help by expanding on stuff that we have put in already then be my guest, but some of the edits you had made recently were, in all honesty, something that sounds like it came from a freshman.... ya just need to look into the way you do your edits.... but thats just an honest opinion from an editor who's been editin for a couple of years...Ancientanubis, talk 04:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and about little things such as himself and his self, all i really care about is the main information portrayed in the article, if there are a small amount of spelling errors then meh... as long as things show up ok under my spell check then it deosnt matter much to me.... so if thast your only reason as 2 why i ma bad editor(b/c i miss some spelling errors, or possibly dont update everything the way you want) then you dont seem to really have much of an argument...Ancientanubis, talk 04:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and if you look @ the history, you'd see that i had attempted to use your "o-part fusion theory" but the key word "theory" breaks the rule of the WP:CB so if i didnt remove it, either someone i work with or some other random editor may have gone in and removed it.... wikipedia is about facts, not the theorys of any fan that has an idea... take naruto for example, the akatsuki page(back when the members were all on the main page) had to basically CONSTANTLY be locked from non member edits as literally the second they did, every fan who had a theory on who the at the time un-named members were, would post there speculations, and even though at times i agreed with them i'd have 2 remove it b/c policy states so... if ya want to make the site a truely good quality then help expand what we have instead of adding a bunch of info that is more speculation....Ancientanubis, talk 04:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. i've yet to graduate from college
2. i have spell check built into my browser so it automatically shows up, so every so often i'll go in and just scroll thru the article and look for the red underline
3. if i were to do anything that were to break any rules or anything i would be as accountable as any other user, and i do not have any friends that are high up or knowin the right people, i have a few friends who help me with doing edits and what not...

so like i said earlier, if you want to be immature as fuck b/c you want to be a little rebel about not following rules of wiki, then so be it, and as i've said about 10x, i review every single edit made to any of the 666 Satan articles, upon which me & or the other people i work with attempt to remove spam/unverified claims and other things of those natures, and prior to talkin with vegas, i discussed the information and the situation with my peers in order to make a decision on what would be the best course of action to take...Ancientanubis, talk 04:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

btw, it is not a concept of a fusion that is possibly probable with any type of o-part, it appears to be a technique that is unique to those 2 o-parts due to the special abilities of those 2 specific o-parts....Ancientanubis, talk 04:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

forget this petty argument about who has a bigger nut sack, so we're going 2 look @ the facts of what this argument is about

what you've done wrong

• added large amounts of information without discussing the addition of this information via the talk page of the article your considering to do this to
• you've added information in a few sections that was already displayed within the same paragraph (almost in the next sentence)
• you've shown a lack of knowledge in the fact that you have to cite your sources & on the occasion that you did cite them you cited them incorrectly
• IMAGE WISE
  • you've shown a lack of knowledge in wiki formating for how to display images
  • one of the two images you uploaded was used to replace an image that was already on the site
    • this image had no need to be replaced as it showed the fact that
      1. what Zero R looks like to a fairly evil soul
      2. what Zero R looks like to a fairly good soul (seeing as it'd be redundant to display just the ring for what "angels" see)

so it's because of these things that i expressed concern in your abilities as an editor, which was why i discussed it with my peers, when messaging my peers(as you have prob read) i gave them your username and explained the situation(from my point of view), from there they were able to check your contributes, and from there able to see the edits you've made to the various 666 Satan pages and draw there own conclusion... AND nowhere in these discussions did i initially say that "i want to ban this kid" or anything like that, hell i even defended you in discussion with one of them, but was semi-convinced in that same discussion that it may be wise to inform an admin about a possible WP:3RR violation, in which i gave him the information he'd need so that he could draw his own conclusion

Ancientanubis, talk 05:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you really want to argue with me about what is in a picture???250 px compared to File:Only he knows.JPG, not only did you not cite the source in the image(and this is not my rule it is wikipedia's rule which is clearly displayed on the upload page), but if you look @ the 2 images, one shows a clear up close representation of the o-part in use, for both an evil soul(the main picture) and a good soul(the inset), look at the other and yes it does show what a more evil soul would see, but it doesn't show anything else besides that you can see what a very evil soul would see the blades as.

about the 3RR rule, it was all a misunderstanding, but nothing can come from it as it would have only been a 24 hour ban, and that period has already passed.

and about the information you displayed after the RAW and before the scanulation, its usually a good idea to wait for a translation or scanlation to be released as to make the information be accurate(its only a few more days wait)

there is not as much of an argument here as a disregard for rules and policy, but do as you want, because i know that you won't listen to anything that anyone says, so if you do something that is not allowed/breaking policy, prepare to have it reverted

Ancientanubis, talk 05:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, look i'm not here cause some one asked me to and I'm on no one's side. Please I know Wiki's rules are frustruating at times but what woyld happen if the site was run by fans posting BS every where? So please cease all arguements and/or edit wars with Anubis. i know you don't have to listen to any one but please for now on talk about edits you want to make before making them. Thank you for listening/reading. ^_^ Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 20:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok after looking at Anubis' talk page I find it hard to assume good faith because of your comments you are on the line of personal attacks. And as for Gohan's page the people who posted that stuff will get blocked but it is sad to see civilization go back 100 years.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 21:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still edits made in good faith should be disscussed before making them and that's what you need to do.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And besides Anubis is right about theories, they aren't allowed.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's your problem you shouldn't yell at people who are trying to talk to you. It's seen in the policy on 3RR.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're yelling again. I myself am not familiar with 666 Satan as you and Anubis are but if it's real then don't call it a theory and show proof and talk about it before you do it.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't assume that others know what you know, that's like me asking you "when in Armored core 4 do you get to fight the #9 linx?" and also as you can see on my page he's asking me what it says there to prove what you're saying to be true.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 things GasSnake,

1. I'm not 100% sure but i believe that your post on your userpage is a personal attack directed towards me and ya can get in trouble for that, so I'll ask nicely if you can please remove it from your user page
2. yes i did read the chapter and as far as i am concerned(and as far as the manga states) Zero only appears to be explaining how the technique works, compared to saying something along the lines of "any angel/demon with something similar to the mark of the beast & a o-part such as Zero R can do it"... so as far as Zero describing how Jio's technique works yes that is not theory, but imho taking that statement and saying that anyone meeting the 2 above mentioned criteria will be able to do it, and you also claimed that i just straight up deleted your "o-part fusion theory" section that you made but i spent about 20 minutes in preview mode(such as i am now makin sure this comment looks right) trying different wordings and placements in the article for the section, but i didnt so i made a decision to remove it......Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 22:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i dont really see me discussing with another friend of mine that i'm having a hard time with an argument/discussion due to(no offense) the fact that the other person refuses to accept or even consider anything that i say, i mean in about 95% of your responses its just you saying stuff like "Still not going to do as your tell me to do man and plus I'm against everyone who takes this place seriously", so please tell me if you were in my shoes and someone tells you this, how are you supose 2 react...

you have to understand that my work day is very stressful(ik you prob dont care but), i work as a carpenter for a theater company, our shop(where we build) is a barn with no air conditioning, we start at 7 in the morning as to get more of our work done before it gets hot, but once it hits noon its like a sauna inside, with temperatures outside of about 95 and temperatures inside the barn @ about 105+, after that i come home to find that someone is refusing to even take into consideration the rules & policies of wikipedia, and not only that but dropping the N bomb (not once, not twice, but 3 times)(granted it was about making a point and not calling anyone, but still) and for about 4 or 5 hours getting in an argument about refusing to listen or even consiter the way things are done... so yes, i told my friends that thought i was going 2 go crazy soon and needed another opinion about what was happening....

im not going to lie, you seem to kno what your doing with stuff in 666 Satan,(but no offense) you lack the finite focus to make your edits go from a 6 to a 9 or 10(outta 10)... im considering starting a 666 Satan wikiproject, where we would be able to have lists and etc, of stuff we want/have/need to do and etc etc, if your interested i'd enjoy having you in the group, but it'd prob be a colition of a few editors (no real leader, but just a group of editors wantin to make a difference) and if i can get a general consensus from the group, a democracy (for things such as images/certain pieces of text we can load them in/up but we all make a decision in the end on if it should be kept, reworded/redone, removed[or something like that]) im not saying that if you dont join this possible group you wont be able to do stuff for 666 satan, but i think it'd keep everyone outta trouble as a whole and what not... but i've got to run to the store to pick up somethin for what im makin for dinner tonight so i'll finish what i was sayin after that, but if your interested or w/e then let me kno... thanks, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 22:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop talking about racism I know what racism does to people and families, i'm 50% jewish on my father's side 3 forths of his family was killed during the Halocaust and in retrospect don't try to look like some little victom becuase at least africans have always had a place to stay unlike jews we had to move from country to country being blamed for anything that went wrong there and then 6 million of us were killed in 6 years time that's worse than any 6 years in Africa and now we're being theartened by several countries, one of which wants to piont a nuke at us. so stop complaining about some idiots calling your people some name. Sticks and Stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. Just get along with others, that's all I'm asking.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 23:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:EvilandGoodSoul.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

haha, tushay(i dont think that is spelled right:P) i am aware wikipedia is not a democracy(in the sense of major discussions) we'll use something that pertains to both of us(in a sense), we're going to use the 666 Satan name change discussion(cant find it right now, but you can look @ the discussion @ the talk page for 666 Satan) longs story short, for overall controversies & discussions in wikipeia, such as an article/template/image/catagory deletion/rename or w/e even if you have the majority of your votes leaning twoards the decision you want, one good point can make the overall decision change(usually admins make the final decision) BUT, nowhere in the WP:DEMOCRACY does it state that a group of editors can't sit down and discuss/make a decision on what should be included in an article/articles that they heavily participate in, going off of this, with a small group of people(say 5 or so people) all possibly with different backgrounds can sit down and discuss what changes should be made to the article/articles, on top of that i feel that if we were to form this small group, we would be able to more effectively manage the 666 Satan articles, along with possibly greatly improving the quality of the information that is presented in them, if there was some other way(AIM, YIM MSN, IRC) we could communicate it may make things easier to discuss all the stuff happenin right now as waitin for a little yellow box to appear can be a bit of a pain in the ass:P, so if ya have one and are interested in continuing this discussion/debate let me know.... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 23:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so whats your opinion on all this man???Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 00:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dude, are you going to say anything about all of this or are you going to ignore me????Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 00:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

primarily i am attempting to gain some supporting members for the wikiproject prior to creating the page, as i feel that a wikiproject with only one member might be nominated for deletion very quickly, i mean once we get a small group of people, then we ought to be able to effectively put a dent into the things that we ought to do inorder to fix up the articles... i mean granted we can still do that w/o a wikiproject, but i feel that if we had one it'd make things go alot smother/quicker/better... (this is not screamin or yellin, just pointin out the main point of the message:P) basically i am asking for your support if a project were to be made, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and thats understandable, and one thing about me is there are times when i am VERY impatient (a very bad habbit of mine @ times), but ya, if your interested in the wiki group i think im gona set up a temp area w/in my userpage here, if you wanna see what things we have that are of MAJOR importance right now (i could actually REALLY user your help with basically EVERY image that is on 666 Satans article(s) if your interested(details on the page i gave ya the link too)), Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

check the link again in about 3 minutes(i had to take a minute to set up the page as when i typed this i set the link up for a blank page which i was gonna type up quickly) but ya, i'm workin on the page right now, the link is here just to be sure ya get it:PAncientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try reloading again(i had to type more for the image thing):P, and i'm gona go in and throw in some basic formattin for the page its self here quick, but ya, while im typin all this i am tryin 2 periodically hit "save page" so as to not keep ya waitin, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

btw, if your interested i can archive most of your talk page so that only the more recent discussions are easily viewable to anyone who stumbles across it) just an idea i thought i'd throw out there for ya... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 02:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ya, i just updated on how to use the template, its actualyl fairely simple, just copy and paste the part listed below into the page of the image and replace the info listed with the relative info of the pic, or if you want, look through the pages and find things that need to be done to the articles and input them into the to-do list while i do the images... your choice, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 02:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sam helped fix up the 666 Satan wikiproject page and i added your name under the member list(if you dont wanna be a part of it feel free to remove it), he added the founder/co-founder thing as (for him, to make sure everythin stays legit) and for me b/c i assume its due to the fact that its on my user page for now), but ya, if/when you get a chance either remove your name(if ya want) or go on in and add what you think ought to be on the to-do list... peace, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its there cheap solution for a scene shop while they wait for there theater to be built(which will have the scene shop attached to the theater compaired to renting a theater near by and building everything @ the shop, then transporting it to a theater about 5 miles away and reassembeling it(let me tell you, gettting a 78 voltswagen beatle through a loading door that is about 16 ft high and prob 3-5 ft wide is not fun:P)) but i enjoy building sets for theater, and the guys i work with are great, so why not put up with some bad to do somethin ya love ya kno??? lol Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 23:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

alright dude, im gonna talk here for a bit, and its up to you if you want to listen or not... i've been watchin some of your discussions with other users (Sam & Gohan mainly) and keep in mind im not saying that this is all absolutely your fault, but you've got to cut the personal attacks on both of them, and yes ik that you can still edit via PSP, Wii & the comp @ your friends house, but its just not right(to insult them like that), so dont take this the wrong way, but i think ya should stop with the arguing with them.... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

trust me gas, i read what they said... and i dont control any of there actions, Sam is a very respectable editor(in my eyes) and i honestly have never seen him and Gohan is the same, but you need to just let things go, we all said things we prob didnt really mean but it was said anyway... i mean ya got to look at things like this, even though we may get into our arguments and squabbles on whats the best road to take for an article or what not, we are all still working towards the same thing, im not forcing you to make friends with either of these people, or make them become your best friend or w/e, but you just got to remember that we all work together in a sense, and its not good to have bad blood amongst us... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and i dont see any reason as to why they wont back off, but there are times when it's also good to just send them a message and make peace, ya dont nes have to say your sorry or anything, but just post somethin along the lines of asking a simple question or just changing the subject, like "what you think of the most recent chapter of Naruto" or somethin... @ least thats what i attempt to do after somethin like that, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well we've got a mini crisis on our hands right now with every image in the articles... when they were uploaded i never included a "fair use statement" so we're going 2 have to include one for EVERY SINGLE image... my question to you is are you interest in helping to add one to every image???Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 01:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do ya understand what needs to happen with all the images and what not now???Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 02:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you still around or did you peace???Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 02:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a favor, could you please remove the Ancientanubis quote from your userpage? No need to purposefully annoy other editors. If I haven't heard back from you in a while, I'll remove it myself. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 14:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you'll wanna respond in your opinion
hey, i didnt set that up or any of that, but i am just giving you a heads up so you can defend your point of view on the whole situation... basically, dont shoot the messenger, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yo, pertaining to the above link there is some stuff i'd like to talk to you about... but i've got to go to a denests apointment for 5(its 4:30 right now) till about 6, but once i get back like i said, i'd like to discuss things with you (whither it be here or on some other median(preferibly AIM or something)) but ya, just thought i'd give ya a heads up, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 21:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

before you say anything im aware that you say you are only interested in making edits and dont really care about any of the other stuff(such as wiki policys and all that other jazz) but this is something you need to read(but its still your choice if you dont want to)

alright, heres what it looks like will happen with this incident report about you, it appears as if your username and possibly IP address will be banned from making edits to wikipedia seeing as you are a troll, bascially saying that you have no real good intentions for wikipedia, and i am not going to lie, there are times when i agree with them. BUT, personally i think that if you really wanted to you could take this incident report and use it for your best and 'turn a new leaf' (in a sense).

I understand that you only really want to be here to make edits for things you think should be on here (and thats the same reason i started workin here too), but the thing you need to understand is that unfortunately we cant just go around and do w/e we want, mainly because that would instill complete and utter chaos all around here, i mean alot of the policys they have here are really not that bad and are really only here to prevent the wikimedia foundation from bein sued and just to make sure the site stays in fairly good quality (article wise that is).

the way i look at everything i do here is that its kinda like a job, all all us editors are kinda like our co-workers, i mean granted we may not like or agree with them, but we still have to work with them in some sense, but we all gather here to add what we know and have to make these articles look the best they can be (and i understand you want that, really i do) but there is the problem of working with other editors that is causing the most trouble right now.

basically the way i feel is that as long as we are all editors here, we need to get along (or at least give the appearance of getting along), basically i think it'd greatly improve your chances of not bein banned if you work on some of the afore mentioned things, but as i said, i am not forcing you to do any of this, just suggesting it'd be a good idea, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 00:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it was archived

im off 2 bed, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 08:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise, I will not hesitate to report you for such if any vandalism occurs. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 18:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i'll find it for you but i must ask... if you dont care about what it says then why tou searching for it??? Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 19:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC) here it is[reply]

its how its always been, and in all honesty its not bad @ all i ya just keep an open mind about it all and dont piss people off, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 20:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you plan on returning to your old ways of launching personal attacks, I will report you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 04:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zero R(666Satan).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey ik we have not always seen eye to eye but i jsut thought i'd send ya this message as well just incase ya were interested, (more so if i could count on your vote XD )..... 666 Satan Move Request, thanks, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 12:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]