Hello George Rodney Maruri Game, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Berry and The Starlighters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Berry and The Starlighters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NativeForeigner ^Talk 20:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello George,

I am following the debate about thermal energy and internal energy. I was particularly interested in your position and your description of thermal energy as summarized in THIS EDIT. I am interested in the explanation you might give to high school students on the following matter:

Teenagers know that jet airliners fly at very great speed and at a great height so they can satisfy themselves that for most of a flight the airliner has very great mechanical energy. They can also see that after a few hours the airliner is back on the ground and parked at the terminal gate where its speed is zero. The challenge for the physics teacher is to convince the students that energy has been conserved, and that this very great amount of mechanical energy has not been erased, destroyed, eliminated etc. I am curious as to whether the best explanation is that this mechanical energy has been converted to heat, thermal energy or internal energy. What is your strategy? (The scenario is not unique to airliners; it is equally valid when applied to an ocean liner or a railway train or a passenger coach etc.)

Debates about the relative merits of heat, thermal energy and internal energy often descend into detail about the motion of atoms and molecules etc. but with the above exercise concerning a jet airliner the conversion of energy is on a much larger scale than atoms and molecules, especially as the mechanical energy eventually ends up in places such as the aircraft's brakes and in the tarmac of the runway so the kinetic theory of gases is only part of the explanation.

If some of your students pointed to the very great mechanical energy of a jet airliner, and then pointed to its mechanical energy being zero after landing at a sea-level airport, and asked you whether it is possible for energy to have been conserved, would you explain it in terms of heat, thermal energy or internal energy? (I would explain it in terms of thermal energy but I see that I may not get a lot of support!) Regards, Dolphin (t) 06:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dolphin,

I feel flattered to receive the visit of such a good contributor of our community. But, if you check again the discussion you reference, you will notice that the man you should be looking for is Kbrose. He holds a Ph. D. degree and is a lot more knowledgeable than me in that matter. I used to teach Physics at high school level but not anymore. I am now working independently as a computer engineer which is my real profession.

Anyways, I will share my point of view with you for the case of a regular passenger airplane. The analysis must consider both TRANSFERS and TRANSFORMATIONS of energy. A simple model follows.

On land: Internal energy

Take-off: Internal energy + Kinetic energy (the aircraft as a whole running on the track)

Fly: Internal energy + Kinetic energy (the whole plane flying) + Gravitational Potential energy

Parking: (Same as take-off)

Internal energy changes are due to three reasons at macroscopic level for open systems: Heat, work and mass transfer. If seen from a microscopic level, the changes are related to changes in the kinetic and potential energies at the sub-atomic, atomic and molecular levels. (Heat, work and mass transfer surely affects these two in my opinion). Those changes/tranfers allow the kinetic energy and the gravitational potential energy to show up at the macroscopic level (as shown in my multi-stage and very simplistic model). Besides, do not forget that both kinetic and potential energies are reference-frame dependent.

If you consider the subsystems of the airplane, you must consider certain things such as the chemical energy in the fuel producing heat and kinetic movement of engines which is later converted into kinetic energy of the plane as whole, the electric energy used in the several components which come from batteries or, possibly, alternators (no aircraft designer here), etc.

So, if one of your friends or brothers-in-law work for Boeing, you are in the right path.

Best regards. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much George. I might take it up with Kbrose to see how he would explain it.

I'm not sure your explanation would work with teenagers in a high school class but it is a long time since I was a teenager and I accept your explanation.

Very best wishes. Dolphin (t) 12:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Rodney Maruri Game. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lore (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Lore (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I'd point out that you're at three reverts on application lifecycle management, as am I, and any further changes in the next 24 hours could place you in a position to be blocked for edit warring. See WP:3RR. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Rodney Maruri Game. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Rodney Maruri Game. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Felicidades (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Menudo--Felicidades--1979--Album front cover--(1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Rodney Maruri Game,

I discussed the naming about WM formation and WW formation at WikiProject Football https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_149#WW_formation

Many people don't know the WM formation and WW formation naming based on formation diagram (Goalkeeper is depicted at the top) But currently formation diagram (goalkeeper is depicted at the bottom) is used usually.

Of course. WM formation is always have called WM fomation But WW formation is called as MM formation in many countires. For example: it:3-2-3-2

This cause confusion. So I think further amplification about letter naming and formation diagrams (goalkeeper top / goalkeeper bottom) in order to prevent confusion and understand easily.

I hope you polish my version. Footwiks (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sohil Makwana Twitter Picture.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Human sacrifice into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 11:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bolted joint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bolt. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did added a link but it is NOT pointing to a disambiguation page but to a specific article. Check the programming of DPL bot, please. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 15:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]