Archives

2008 2009 2010 2011

Your monobook.js currently contains some JavaScript errors. Anything of the form <!-- START TWINKLE --> needs to be changed to either // START TWINKLE (if the comment is on a single line) or /* START TWINKLE */ (if the comment spans multiple lines). For instance,

<!-- importScript('User:Gracenotes/amelvand.js'); -->

should be

// importScript('User:Gracenotes/amelvand.js');

. Cheers, —mc10 (t/c) 03:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, for Twinkle, you should remove the following lines:

if( typeof( TwinkleConfig ) == 'undefined' ) TwinkleConfig = {}; // DO NOT REMOVE THIS LINE - ALL TWINKLE SETTINGS AFTER THIS
TwinkleConfig.markAIVReportAsMinor = false;
TwinkleConfig.markSockReportAsMinor = false;
TwinkleConfig.markUAAReportAsMinor = false;
TwinkleConfig.markRevertedPagesAsMinor = [];
TwinkleConfig.watchWarnings = false;
TwinkleConfig.watchRevertedPages = [];
TwinkleConfig.watchSpeedyPages = [];
TwinkleConfig.openTalkPage = [];
TwinkleConfig.showSharedIPNotice = false;
TwinkleConfig.summaryAd = '  '

Twinkle is now customized through Wikipedia:Twinkle/Preferences, not through the JavaScript file directly. Cheers, —mc10 (t/c) 03:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm a little outdated, am I? Well, thanks for optimizing my monobook.js! I've made the necessary changes. Goodvac (talk) 04:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Also, remove the Friendly lines as well:

// START FRIENDLY
importScript('User:Ioeth/friendly.js');
if( typeof( FriendlyConfig ) == 'undefined' ) FriendlyConfig = {}; // DO NOT REMOVE THIS LINE - ALL FRIENDLY SETTINGS AFTER THIS
FriendlyConfig.watchTaggedPages    = false;
FriendlyConfig.watchWelcomes = false;
FriendlyConfig.enableClock = false;
// END FRIENDLY

Friendly has been incorporated into Twinkle; you edit all settings at Wikipedia:Twinkle/Preferences. Cheers, —mc10 (t/c) 04:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks again! Goodvac (talk) 04:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} Would an admin delete all the pages listed in the archive box on this page, except the last four, per WP:U1? Thanks! Goodvac (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm on it now -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All done -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Goodvac (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For fixes to cover me (urban legend) In ictu oculi (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad to help! Thanks for the barnstar. Take care, Goodvac (talk) 05:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Goodvac.

Many thanks for your help. And the cookies ! I have enjoyed the process of getting my first entry in, and am most grateful for the help you have given me. TTE678 (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, although I didn't give you the cookies—Hallows AG (talk · contribs) did. Take care, Goodvac (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've removed a few CSD tags that suggested deletion under the A7 criteria. I just wanted to give you a heads up on a couple of things. The A7 criteria does not correlate to notability, but is reflective of a lack of significance and/or importance specifically presented in the article. Remember that significance is separate and distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. If you have questions, feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 01:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cindy, for the note. "Significance" is another way to say "asserts notability" ("the subject is notable/significant"). I remove A7 tags when I see reliable sources (in the article or from my searches) that directly discuss the subject, implying passage of the GNG. That said, I recognize that A7 concerns significance presented in the text, but I prefer to take a broader look and see if it meets the GNG or an SNG so as to discourage an AfD or a PROD. If it doesn't meet the GNG or an SNG, I note this (for example, [1]) in case the tagger wishes to pursue deletion. Goodvac (talk) 01:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see that you probably got here through this edit. I didn't notice that you had commented on the talk page. However, I think that one notable artist releasing something under the label is enough for A7. Goodvac (talk) 01:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey there! I wouldn't have normally commented, but the deletion policy specifically rules out any correlation between significance and notability. You can review the policy here. The A7 CSD is considered the most commonly misunderstood speedy deletion criteria. The assertion of significance is not in correlation to references, unless they indicate notability in accordance with the general notability guidelines. At the same time, an article may be sourced, yet still fail to indicate significance or importance, meeting the A7 criteria for deletion. Regarding the removal of A7 tags (when you see reliable sources that imply meeting the GNG), I honestly don't see consistency in the removal. Tags have been accurately removed, where the article clearly met the A7 deletion policy. And at the same time, while you correctly declined the A7 on the Simon Westlund article, you suggested deletion through another process for a subject recognized on an international basis, receiving awards as the best in his field, presented in the se.wiki, and for which independent and reliable sources are readily available. As far as record labels, notability is not established for a label, based on roster or recordings. Record labels are organizations, which require established notability through significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. (BTW: Launchpad Records does not include any notable artists signed to their label.) That said, while I regularly monitor deletion nominations, I didn't place the A7 CSD and I don't fault you for declining the A7, it was essentially a judgement call that you are clearly free to make. Know that this is not a desire to diminish your work, but to offer assistance where policies and guidelines have been misapplied. I honestly, just wanted to offer some help. Accept it or reject it. It's up to you. We are currently working with students presenting their work online and accordingly, it is essential that we at least attempt to address inconsistencies and noncompliance when able. Again, if you have questions, please feel free to ask. If you would like counsel regarding anything I've mentioned here, you might consider posting a question to the discussion page of the CSD policy. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 05:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't get me wrong—I'm glad you started this conversation, just putting my thoughts out there.
  Tags have been accurately removed, where the article clearly met the A7 deletion policy. So are you saying that if the article does not assert significance but sources are found to meet the GNG, the article should be deleted? If substantial sources are available, there ought to be an effort to save the article. Some articles don't assert notability but if one searches for sources and finds that the subject meets the GNG, should A7 deletion be carried out nevertheless?
  I agree—I have been inconsistent in my edit summaries. I intend to write "A7 does not apply" when the tag is incorrect and "remove speedy" when I have found sources that help pass the GNG (for example, [2]).
  With regard to Simon Westlund, yes, there are sources available to verify his championship, but I am not willing to make a judgement call as to whether that meets WP:ANYBIO.
  What's this talk of "students"? Goodvac (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Valley Driver Video Review (6th nomination) An AFD you participated in last month is at AFD again. Dream Focus 00:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with my new articles Paul_D._Foote and William_Z._Hassid - thank you so much Standard2211 (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem! Goodvac (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Wallace O. Fenn, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Rockefeller Institute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with one of my articles ! In the meantime I created more :-) ... Help with them would be appreciated as well.

• William_Z._Hassid
• Paul_D._Foote
• Arthur_D._Hasler
• Josef_Fried
• William_C._Stadie
• Charles_Heidelberger

Standard2211 (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as well as the latest:

• Melvin_Lax
• Herman_S._Bloch

Standard2211 (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your effort to work on the article, but it looks like most of the changes you made are to format rather than to content. It's still blatant advertisement. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some puffery in those edits. What exactly do you find blatantly non-neutral in the article? Here's what I found:

• Lead — all fact.
• "Personal life and faith" — "special appreciation for the people of Israel and have caused him to spearhead many ministries in support of Jews and Israel"
• "Journalist" — all fact.
• "Speaker" — "widely sought-after speaker", "broad perspectives ... are widely valued and deeply cherished"
• "The ten Boom Fellowship" — all fact
• "Jerusalem Prayer Team" — all fact
• "Honors" — all fact
• "Author" — "great peril of the Jewish people"
• "Documentary producer" — "EIM is a California-based 501(c) 3 non-profit organization describing itself as dedicated to quality family-oriented programming in all facets of communication."
• "Filmography" — "Jewish struggle for freedom and statehood and the forces that threaten her stability"

That's all I can see that can be construed as promotional or non-neutral. Even so, these examples do not warrant outright deletion of the article. G11 is only for articles that are "exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten". That doesn't qualify here. As much as I dislike using maintenance tags, I think the best option here is to tag it with {{peacock}} or {{npov}}. Goodvac (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Speaker section has hyperbole problems other than the ones you named; there appears to be a general issue with implicitly crediting Evans for things that other people did, such as having Sharansky released or interviewing Ahmadinejad; the promotional nature of the ten Boom and JPT sections. OTOH, most of this isn't sourced anyway; probably the solution is to gut the page. BLP (and V) requires that stuff be cited, and the fact that this is positive material doesn't change that. And what is sourced is cited to self-published stuff, which is not how one goes about writing an article; one reflects coverage in reliable sources, and then uses SPS to fill anything necessary in. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. As you said, there are serious problems with the article (poor sourcing and BLP), but I still don't believe G11 is the applicable CSD. Feel free to tag the page again per G11, and we'll see what the reviewing admin thinks. Best, Goodvac (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I gutted most of it, so unless the same PR users that created the page pop back in and restore the advert material, we should be fine. Feel free to take out more, too. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would have completely reduced it to a well-sourced stub, but it's fine to leave a skeleton there. I'll take a look tomorrow (short on time now) and see what else can be done. Goodvac (talk) 23:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I don't see any more puffery, so I think it's fine for now. Goodvac (talk) 05:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goodvac. Thank you for reaching out to me and being a source of contact. I came across a page that I did not create, but was of interest to me, and was being considered for deletion. The page was poorly written so I have been editing it. My first question: Is it possible for me to get a more advanced editor to look at the work I have done on a page in order to get feedback related to the quality of my work? My second question: How long does the debate process go on before a final decision is rendered in regard to the fate/outcome of a page? Thank you for your time and attention. Therebelking (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Therebelking[reply]

No problem, Therebelking. I am glad that you are interested in improving articles up for deletion. The process in which you are participating at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage Sun is called articles for deletion (AfD). It usually lasts seven days; if few people have commented at the AfD, there will be a relist to allow for more opinions. One critique about your comment at the AfD: although you pointed to a specific guideline (WP:BAND), you did not provide evidence in the form of links, which are crucial at AfD. You wrote that Savage Sun "has been the subject of multiple ... reliable sources". Provide links to these sources so other participants can reconsider their position if necessary.
Finally, for assistance from experienced editors, you can post here or place {{helpme}} on your talk page with your request for feedback. If no one answers your request by next week, I'll probably check the article and perhaps offer an opinion at the AfD. Goodvac (talk) 03:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goodvac, I've been meaning for a while to hand out a few more of these. Today I started counting up who has been doing the grunt work at the Resource Exchange over the last year. Then I got up to 100 or so requests and dropped that plan. :) GabrielF is a pretty major contributor there but you are running a pretty solid second place or so. A few months after I started editing I had this great idea, which it turns out had already just been started up. I've always felt that the Library is a critical resource in improving our content. Thanks much for doing all the work to help out there, and here is the 4th-ever award. :) Franamax (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Diligent Librarian Barnstar
		For exemplary performance at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Franamax (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am greatly honored to receive this award. Thank you! :) Goodvac (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask you to fix the closing summary to reflect the actual consensus which was "withdrawn, with three votes for keep" and remove the editorialized soapboxing which does not reflect anything but the opinion of the nominator.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to drag me into your disputes. I merely made a formatting change. Goodvac (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, it's funny how watchlists work. I've made the requested change, am aware of the dispute, and if I do get dragged into this am fully prepared to act in an administrative capacity with respect to any party. Goodvac, sorry for the orange bar. Franamax (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, I don't mind it. Thanks for dealing with this—much appreciated. Goodvac (talk) 23:19, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goodvac. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#The Find sources template is currently linking to the main Google News site, sans the search criterion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goodvac. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orr's (department store).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goodvac. You have new messages at Talk:Costa Concordia#Map.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mjroots (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note on User talk:Dream Focus#Merge != Delete reminding this editor that merging isn't deleting and also reminding them to assume good faith but the initial response indicates that they are still looking at this from a very defensive position. Would you mind weighing in there as well? Maybe having 2 editors share their thoughts will help. If nothing else it will allow us to take this to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct to get some other points of view. I'm a bit reluctant to go ahead with the merge as DreamFocus and Luciferwildcat seem unwilling to compromise.--RadioFan (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend, I am sorry for the delay in replying to your question. Although things have now moved on and it is clear what the ship's track was for her last hour or so, yes, my information came partly from that publication, but also from the AIS data which showed her track (although the last AIS info I saw had her on a heading of (from memory) 010 degrees and a speed of just over a knot.) Also a look at the available charts of the area clearly shows the reef we are talking about. Further, the pictures (stills & video) showed her where she currently is and a lot of confusion may have occurred because of her orientation, as well as the gash on her port quarter. The VDR will confirm this, but I expect that she was turning to starboard (away from the shore) at the time of impact. Anyway, greetings to you. Best wishes, --Rich0908 (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rich, for the clarification. I hope you stick around. Best regards, Goodvac (talk) 18:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already posted such a request here, perhaps you remember. Can you provide me the newest entry for South Sudan and the Solomon Islands of that book (from their website)?--Antemister (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll find that for you later today. Cheers, Goodvac (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a specific aspect of the countries that you want the entry for? The entire entry is just too big, and the site doesn't have a function to collate all the different pages into one page. Goodvac (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I try to improve the Timeline of the introduction of television in countries (my draft in the German WP, where I use the Europa World Year Book from 2008) by adding references to it, so I need the "Broadcasting and Communications" chapter, which usually includes the year the first TV station was founded or at least the name of it. I also need Dominica, the 2008 book did contain Information about the broadcast media there--Antemister (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page hierarchy is: South Sudan / Directory: Society and Media / Broadcasting and Communications / Broadcasting / Television / South Sudan TV. On "South Sudan TV", it has:

Juba
Dir-Gen. Arop Bagat Tingloth.

"Arop Bagat Tingloth" links to a page that has:

South Sudan TV
Juba
Dir-Gen.

For the Solomon Islands, the page hierarchy is: Solomon Islands / Directory: Society and Media / Broadcasting and Communications / Broadcasting / Radio / Solomon Islands Broadcasting Corporation. At the last page, it has:

POB 654, Honiara
Tel: 20051
Fax: 23159
Email: sibcnews@solomon.com.sb
Internet: www.sibconline.com.sb
Founded 1976; daily transmissions in English and pidgin; broadcasts total 112 hours per week.
Chair. Augustine Taneko.
Gen. Man. Cornelius Rathamana.
Editor Walter Nalangu.

There is no "Television" page for the Solomon Islands. Goodvac (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the Solomon Islands still have no TV. Is there any information about the year the south sudanese TV station were founded?--Antemister (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't think so. As you see, the hierarchy above shows exactly what pages I went through, and each linked to the next, providing no information about the topic. Goodvac (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An discussion on possible deletion of the Francesco Schettino biographical article (currently a redirect to the article on the disaster) is underway at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Schettino. I see you've particiapated in discussions on this topic in the past and thought you might like to share your thoughts as well.--RadioFan (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for Proxying User:Dream Focus' comments to the ANI discussion on his block. Your help in giving the blocked editor fair input into the discussion is noted and appreciated. Jclemens (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! It was my pleasure to help. Goodvac (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Michael Q. Schmidt, hereby award Goodvac the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. ...for having the keen eyes and wisdom to decline the speedy placed on My Lady's Lips.[3] When a film article stub survives to be improved, the entire encyclopdia benefits. Awarded 23:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I should be thanking you. Very quick but exceptional work on that one! Goodvac (talk) 23:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you are going through all my edits and reverting them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savetheday91 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're on an anti-Assyrian campaign, best evinced in this inappropriate edit. Goodvac (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for turning up those sources about Elias Abraham Rosenberg on the Resource exchange, I'm impressed with your work! Mark Arsten (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem! I can search more extensively if you want using some of my other subscription databases (I only searched ProQuest). Goodvac (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you don't mind that would be great. I'm trying to get this up to Featured Article quality and ensuring that it is a "thorough... survey of the relevant literature" is quite a challenge for an obscure subject like this. Some sources I have found don't have Rosenberg's first name, and I found that searching for his last name along with the King's name helpful. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Finding information about Rosenberg is a challenge indeed. This is the little that I found, but the information may be redundant to what you already have in the article.

Enjoy! Goodvac (talk) 20:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting, thanks, this does give me a few things to add to the article. It's funny, I was worried that this would be sent to AFD for lack of sources when I started working on it! Mark Arsten (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad they were helpful. Good luck at FAC! Goodvac (talk) 01:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goodvac,

I just wanted to thank you for your help editing my article on Ralph Waldo Tyler. Your edits improved my article and barring some improvements of reconnecting some of the text to different footnotes, (which I'll play around with later) I'm happy with the article. I want to add a photo of Tyler now and will try to do it first by myself. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karenfaye56 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; it was my pleasure. Thanks for creating that quality article! Goodvac (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Costa Concordia disaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seen message, but logging off now. I'll have a look and reply tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me? 20:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Goodvac (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really think this article is too problematic to be restored, even though he is arguably notable. I appreciate that you have attempted to salvage what is, after all, an apparent autobiography (see initial editor), but

• is a New Zealand photographer whose pictures examine the strange anthropology of cities around the world. Working and living between Auckland and Paris his practice investigates the nature of reality and the relationship between parallel lives... His work deals with the democracy of non-places in the knowledge that nothing is as it seems. — I find it difficult to see in what sense this is encyclopaedic, factual, and neutral, rather than a publicity blurb.
• The lack of any personal information, even city of birth, DoB etc, suggests the intention is to publicise what he's done, rather than tell us anything about him.
• I appreciate that you have added references, but because they are not in-line, it makes it difficult to see what parts of the factual text (books, exhibitions etc) each is verifying
• Photo education is an important part... — pov posing as fact.
• I'm astonished that you think that a section headed Praise, laden with unsourced quotes (names given, no actual sources), is acceptable. It's obvious self-promotion. Where is the Negative criticism section?
• The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.

If you really think it's worth trying to get this to be more that a vanity page for its original creator, let me know and I'll sandbox it for you to work on. I just think it has too many problems to just be restored and tweaked a bit, All the best Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that we should be ascribing motives to article creators and deleting pages based on them, however manifest those motives are. All that matters is the quality of the article. I admit, the article had parts that were POV-laden, but POV ≠ promotion, so outright deletion was unnecessary. As for the section header "Praise", that was my mistake—it was odd to have a list of quotes floating at the bottom of the article, but I couldn't think of a suitable header.
Nevertheless, please userfy the article for me and I'll rewrite it with reliable sources and check back with you when I'm done. Thanks for the thorough explanation though. Goodvac (talk) 07:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we even have a filter that automatically flags up autobiographies/coi, so I don't think it's just me. Anyway, the guy seems to meet the notability criteria, so you should be able to salvage something. Text shortly here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! Goodvac (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a tweak where what is obviously a subjective opinion was presented as fact, otherwise looks much better than before. I think it's ready to be moved to article space, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good catch. I've moved it to mainspace. Best, Goodvac (talk) 07:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right here as the sentence is theoretical. Multiple life sentences are not unknown, though. Britmax (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've heard of sentences exceeding a lifetime, but not actual imprisonment for that long. Goodvac (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks for your help with my template question! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! Goodvac (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for observing at WP:HD that the problems with colors not changing for visited ELs is a Monobook issue. I've since switched (temporarily) to my backup account, which has a different skin, and all is fine. Nyttend backup (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem! You could have just changed to another skin on your original account when you're doing work with external links, so you don't have to use an alternate account. Anyhow, in case you haven't noticed, a bug has been filed by TheDJ (talk · contribs), though I'm not sure when a fix will be deployed. Cheers, Goodvac (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to have to bother with changing lots of settings (or having things show up months from now that I didn't expect to happen) on the main account, so I figured the alternate would work better. I'm over 80% done on the EL-related project anyway. Nyttend backup (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's great. Goodvac (talk) 02:08, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goodvac, I'm trying to get access to this and this. Do you have access to them? Any help would be appreciated, thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I sure do. Here you go: [4] and [5]. Cheers, Goodvac (talk) 05:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, you're like my own personal Santa Claus. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you're welcome! Goodvac (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goodvac, you're killing me. Why the double-standard? Whoever created the Sprinkles Wiki entry makes claims only substantiated by erroneous media reports in local daily papers, not by top-notch culinary researchers or experts. The articles sited are NOT written about thorough investigation of which bakeries are cupcake-only. The mentions, if/where they exist are asides.

However, that Sprinkles is cupcakes-only is more than implied, articles or not. Cupcake Royale exists down the street from me. Yes, they will make you a beverage out of coffee beans. Otherwise, all they do is CUPCAKES. That's it. And, that's why people come to them. It's very well known, from NPR to the NY Times. I just can't find a sentence for the dense amongst us that say "Cupcake Royale is a cupcake only bakery. Want a photo? How else would you like this substantiated? Maybe I can grab a crappy blogger's quote that says Cupcake Royale is indeed Cupcakes Only. Maybe one can be made up, posted and then referenced.

See what I'm saying? Let's be smarter.

Until someone contests Cupcake Royale's existence as a cupcakes-only bakery, I think it absurd that we question it as being so when there's zero hard evidence that Sprinkles had no predecessor. In fact, there's plenty of evidence to the contrary but Sprinkles gains fame, notoriety and economic benefit from claiming they're the first. C'mon!

So, want a PICTURE of their bakery/bakeries? A quote from the owner????

Thanks.Xtiang (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Double standard for what? I wrote the Sprinkles Cupcakes entry, and all the sources are reliable and sufficiently support the cited text. "[T]op-notch culinary researchers or experts" are not necessary.
I question it because I have seen multiple sources, listed on your talk page, that state explicitly that Sprinkles was the first. If "there's plenty of evidence to the contrary" and Cupcake Royale is "very well known, from NPR to the NY Times", then there must be reliable sources you can bring to the table. Wikipedia article rely on reliable sources, not original research. Goodvac (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Curator's Barnstar
	For your tireless work in the Resource Exchange. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 20:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. :) Goodvac (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you remember I asked for some resources here. It is because of your help I am able to create this article. Some user by the name JoshuSasori is removing the claim that NMD is celebrated in Japan. You provided a quote from the book, based on which I added the information. I've left a note on their talk page. Could you have a look into it. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 13:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:National Masturbation Day --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 15:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment there. Best, Goodvac (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-princesscruises-sm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goodvac!

I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:

http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble

Let me know if you would be willing to help!

Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com

Devbot (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look at this diff and figure out why {{CLO}} caused that? Ryan Vesey 16:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I fixed it in this edit. The extra noinclude tag added a new line. Ryan Vesey 17:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you fixed it. Goodvac (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, thought I'd post something after the resolution of the Riley Schillaci AfD discussion. While I am personally annoyed that the process has effectively "rewarded" some pretty disgraceful conflict of interest and sock-puppetry from the subject of the article, I think the outcome was (nonetheless) the right one. The fact that you were willing to stick to your guns and remain civil and courteous (where others would have given up or become hostile) is a credit to you. As such, I thought it only fair that you be given the following...

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For saving an article with content-focussed argument, civil discussion and genuine consensus building where most others would have simply given up. Stalwart111 (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you for your kind words! :) Goodvac (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear Goodvac, Thanks for your patient tutelage with my sign-in issue. My problem was that I was not reading the boxes right on my email sign-in. It had said "new email address" and it had not occurred to me that I could type in something there because the box to the right of it contained my Wiki user name--it wasn't blank. So I thought it was a box for my user name. It didn't occur to me to type my new email address over top of it, until I read your recommendation that I try this. Bottom line and good news: I did type in my new email overtop of my user name, AND IT WORKED. Now all I have to do is figure out how to register for the news database which was my purpose for registering an email. Thanks again! EMP (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad you got it registered successfully! Goodvac (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Goodvac. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using the Page Curation suite recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation Wikipedia:Page Curation/Introductionhere that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good rescue job on Kids' meal. Think that's DYK material? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words. In fact, it is DYK material; I nominated it at Template:Did you know nominations/Kids' meal. Cheers, Goodvac (talk) 00:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goodvac. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Kids' meal.
Message added 17:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kids' meal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that legislators in Arizona have banned bans on toys accompanying kids' meals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kids' meal. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Goodvac! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axis Airways.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goodvac,

You gave me some helpful feedback on my article "Ralph Waldo Tyler" in the past so I'm wondering if you good again. An editor orphaned the article I created entitled "Ralph Waldo Tyler". The problem, he says, is that I was not linked to any other wikipedia article. So I added verifiable information on Tyler to the "Emmett Jay Scott" article and created a link from the Tyler article to the Scott article. Is this all I need to do? I want to get feed back from another editor on wikipedia before I "undo" the original editor's orphaning. Thx Karen Taborn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.222.205.183 (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discreet abbreviation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goodvac,

I realize I am almost five years late, but I wanted to thank you for approving the article I started about Tom Trusky after the first editor rejected it out of hand. I would have responded sooner, but I lost track of your original message until I happened to stumble on it just today. Good editors like you are essential to the success of Wikipedia.

Sincerely, Donald Barclay (Dog-519)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Length of a day. Since you had some involvement with the Length of a day redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to User:Goodvac/reftoolbar.js has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi! Would it be possible for you to add

/* <nowiki> */

to the top and

/* </nowiki> */

to the bottom of User:Goodvac/reftoolbar.js? By putting these tags inside of javascript comments, it won't impact the functionality of your script, but it will keep the backend software from transcluding Template:Reflist" + col2 + ". You will know if the tags worked if Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Reflist" + col2 + " no longer shows your javascript page. By fixing these, we can keep the number of entries in Special:WantedTemplates to a minimum. Thank you in advance for your help! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xaosflux, could you help with this? Thank you! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — xaosflux ^Talk 19:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nigger Hills and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 21#Nigger Hills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]