I haven't reviewed it in detail (and may not) but I was glad to see your work on FFriess from the Times article. I've made a few minor adjustments to your citation there. One, I'd recorded the headline (from the front Times webpage) differently than you had it; and yours didn't strike me maybe as an exact rendition, the comma, the lower case "a"; so I shifted to mine. If I was wrong or if yours was also right and you prefer it, change it back or ask me and I will. The other changes I expect you'll agree with, are real minor. You probably didn't even notice, but I'd put the article in the Ext. links at the bottom of the article earlier (not ready to do the work you did at that moment). I've now removed it there because it's (now well-)represented in the references. Something to watch for if you think of it in the future.

And, welcome! You're relatively new; and I have to note, "red-lettered". Some choose to stay that way, but it's easy to click on the red and create however elaborate or simple a user page as you wish. I think it looks better. Prob. works within Wiki a little more smoothly. This page may cover it more thoroughly for you, if you wish.

All best.

Well, betraying my ways: You may be curious (as I couldn't wait) to learn that the page had almost 15,000 hits on the 9th. One of my other minor edits was to add accessdate to your footnote; to do so I had to assume you were in the Western Hemisphere working in the evening (or something like that); the "standard clock" for Wiki is called UTC, which I date myself by calling (correctly I think) "like Greenwich Mean"; ... so your edit was booked at 3 a.m. UTC but late evening EST eg (five hours behind, I think now). ... Here's the page activity page. Get to it via View history tab up top of any page; then via Page view statistics up top of history page. ... If I was wrong on your access date, you or I can change it to the 10th. (I don't think Wiki expects one to ... adjust to ... UTC for dating; then there'd be "skews" ...; or I just couldn't keep it straight in my head.) ... It's sufficiently contorted, I forgot to make my point: namely, your edit was booked on the 10th regardless of your local time when you made it; and hence had no direct impact on the 15,000 who accessed the page the 9th, most of them probably due to the Times article. (There was a smaller spike the 8th, maybe 7T; but this was definitely post-primary. And the Times article was prob. available on-line for a part of the 8th. Of course, I don't know all the (other possible) news reports that could have contributed to the W/Th spike.) ... Prolix! (Helps keep me in my place.) (In various possible senses ... of the phrase.) Well, reply here or at my "talk" if you wish. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You performed some extensive copyediting on Dyslexia but did not complete an edit summary. Please always do that so other editors can understand what you were intending.

In this case you changed some en-dashes to em-dashes. The Manual of Style (MOS) says that we should not change the existing style of an article without a substantial reason (for example "the way I prefer" is not a substantial reason for changing an existing style) and in any case we should not make such changes inconsistently. Since "(nbsp)(en-dash)(space)" is clearly a deliberate style choice as distinct from something like "(space)(minus)(space)" which does not conform to MOS there was no justification for those changes in this case. I will restore the previous style. --Mirokado (talk) 12:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- in this edit and this edit, you added a lot of nbsp tags when they weren't needed. No edit summary was used. Why have you done this? tedder (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Haeinous, I noted your recent edits on the Arctic policy of Canada article. Welcome. Good to have some help. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 23:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note 2, I have placed Arctic policy of Canada#Legal landscape in a different part of the outline. Your thoughts/ideas are certainly welcome. I have some free time of late and have been making a few edits. :) DonaldRichardSands (talk) 05:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments would be appreciated at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting#E.g. or e.g.,. Wahrmund (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Qantas does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! JetBlast (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SITA business logo and strapline.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Puget Sound Regional Council logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for copyediting and updating Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Please consider making an eedit summary , even somthing simple such as Copyediting & updating - I believe tjhis has been mentioned several times before. Also, the edit contained dozens of changes but you marked it as a minor edit, which of course it was not. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

from MOS:CAPTION: "Most captions are not complete sentences, but merely sentence fragments that should not end with a period." I will go ahead and remove the periods you added to Navarre‎. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can you insist on this when the Guinness Book cite is clearly obsolete? - Denimadept (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your last edit of Cartouche left this in the text:

  ...also referred to as the , and the "Son of Ra" titulary,

I would have fixed it, but it's not clear what you wanted to do with the edit, so maybe you should fix it in the way you intended. 2001:470:D08D:0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When making edits such as this one please do not alter the format within quotes (eg "{{quote|based on World War...") -- PBS (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Copyediting is a great way of getting involved with Wikipedia, and we always need more good people. One tip - you can (and should) delete the Disambiguation link notfication messages once you've fixed the ambiguities. I did that earlier today on my own talk page, as I've realised that others might think we haven't fixed them yet... Edwardx (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here. I hope we see more of you! Tony (talk) 08:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/07/19/271431/fdd-donors/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Foundation for Defense of Democracies and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Foundation for Defense of Democracies, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Foundation for Defense of Democracies with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Foundation for Defense of Democracies. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Foundation for Defense of Democracies saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 07:57, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Haeinous, I note you recently added information from the French Wikipedia into Jean-Yves Le Drian. Please note that translations of copyrighted text, even from other Wikimedia projects, are derivative works, and attribution must be given to satisfy licensing requirements. When translating material from a Wikimedia project licensed under CC-By-SA, a link should be placed to the original at the article's talk page. The template {{Translated page}} is available for this purpose. I've fixed this for you now, but if there are any other articles you have translated in whole or in part, it would be great if you could add the above-noted template to their respective talk pages. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anti-Iranian sentiment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to War Refugee Board may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (Specifically, please see MOS:LQ.) Toccata quarta (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Haeinous. I'm not sure if you are aware of the WP:OVERLINKING guideline, but I removed the overlinking edits you made to the Hebephilia article; those links are already linked in the article. This edit shows my removals (and there is a followup clarification after that). Read the WP:OVERLINKING guideline for when to avoid repeating a link; in general, we should avoid repeating a link in an article. Flyer22 (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Haeinous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

128.220.159.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Fatpedro". The reason given for Fatpedro's block is: "Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: matching master".

• Blocking administrator: Bbb23 (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Checks out; I think that should do it. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 07:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address that is blocked is one that's used from the library at Johns Hopkins SAIS in DC; I wonder if "Fatpedro" is a student?

Hey, Haeinous; yep, that's more than possible. Anyway, I think I've removed the block; I'll watchlist this page for the time being, so you can post here again if you're still having problems editing (or feel free to post another unblock template, like the one above). Thanks, and happy editing! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 07:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you so much for using VisualEditor. Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters…" tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:

• Do you normally use a character inserter? Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
• How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
  • Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
  • How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
  • How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
• The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters? If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
• Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
• Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes.

Please leave your views on the MediaWiki feedback page (your regular username/password works there), or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I noticed that you previously engaged in commentary on asmallworld, it is currently up for deletion. If you think it should be kept or deleted please voice that opinion, as the deletion debate closes tomorrow. Thanks (Mostlyoksorta (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

I have encountered a possible copyright violation:

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [1]
• Source: [2]

Some or all of the content appears to be copy pasted.

I see above that others have talk to you about this before. You did not reply to those posts. Now, looking through your contributions, I see many more possible copyright violations.

Three things:

• 1. Please reply to this post. Please tell me whether or not you have been copy pasting content.

• 2. If this is so, you must not copy paste again. Really. If you do, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

• 3. If you have, please, please, help me go through your edits, find the copy pastes, and undo them.

So, will you help? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Your addition: "...Another is that the damage done by the Great Recession was so long-lasting and permanent, so many workers will never get jobs again, that we really can't recover..."
• Source: "...Another is that the damage done by the Great Recession was so long-lasting and permanent, so many workers will never get jobs again, that we really can't recover..."

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another (I do not see a copyright notice at the source site, but I also cannot find anything saying the site is public domain.):

• Your addition: "...The Council consists of five to eleven members and is a working council, this means the members themselves do research and write reports. They do this in cooperation with the scientific staff. Decisions of the Council are made collectively. Council members are appointed for a term of five years. They may serve a maximum of two terms. The present Council term expires at the end of 2017...."
• Source: "...The Council consists of five to eleven members and is a working council, this means the members themselves do research and write reports. They do this in cooperation with the scientific staff. Decisions of the Council are made collectively. Council members are appointed for a term of five years. They may serve a maximum of two terms. The present Council term expires at the end of 2017. ..."

In going through your edits, I see so many valuable contributions. Huge, huge contributions! So, why on Earth is there copy pasting once in a while? I just do not understand. What am I missing? When I first started at Wikipedia, I sometimes used the flawed technique of copy pasting several paragraphs to the edit window or notepad, and then modifying them so they would not longer be a copyright violation. If I forgot a paragraph, it would end up in the article verbatim. Is this what is happenening? If so, why all the warnings as still more copyvios? Please, please explain this. You have been around a long time, and know what you are doing. This just does not make sense to me and I do not want to see you go, nor do I want to go through your edits looking for this stuff. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see you are just continuing to edit without responding to my post above. No "Oops". No "I'm sorry. I won't do it again." No explanation about why you've ignored previous warnings and persisted. I would be very grateful for some sort of answer stating whether or not you intend to help remove past copyvios. So, how about a response? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to Autorité des marchés financiers (France) Sargdub (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i noticed your recent edit which included sunflower seeds. This is incorrect as it causes the "s" to be displayed in black while the link is blue. In fact /nowiki is required so i am not certain it does anything. Both [[sunflower seed|sunflower seeds]] and [[sunflower seed]]s do work however. Rmhermen (talk) 04:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. This edit to Épuration légale introduced a typo that persisted for the next two years - you stuck a non-breaking space on top of the word "years". Was this really necessary? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Haeinous,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Haeinous. You added the "Personal life" section to the article. You added a great deal of information which, however factual it may be, was not included in the reference cited. It took a while to cover the reference, so rather than try to separate wheat from chaff, I blanked the section. If you can restore the section and info with proper verification, please do. Regards Tapered (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Per MOS:OVERLINK, please do not link English words understood by most readers in context. Also, please do not add the MOS:OXFORD comma to articles, unless you are initiating the article. That guideline states: "Editors may use either convention so long as each article is internally consistent", so don't change the convention within an article. For an analogous situation, please see WP:CITEVAR. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the leads of medical articles we generally reference every sentence. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Kestrel Institute, Haeinous!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a link to the official website.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that in 2014 you've made a professional contribution to Gene Lyons's article and decided to ask for your help with The National Memo article. Lyons is a frequent contributor to it so I assume that you know this media (and the liberal press) quite well. The article has been undergoing dramatic edits and I ask for your assistance in editing/improving this article.

I while ago I was asked to make several minor edits to the article as paid editor (properly stated according to WP COI editing rules). At that time the article had minimal content and was no more than a stub. I’ve added some information following the structure of such articles as Salon (website), HuffPost, Politico adding infobox, improving categories and adding some well-referenced info. The article started to look like a normal website/media article. After that it got heavily edited in two waves by editors deleting large chunks of well-written (ok, my personal view :)) and well-referenced information. I believe that some of these edits/deletions are extraneous and actually make the article worse/less useful to Wikipedia users. I also believe that The National Memo article has an undisputable notability. There is an interesting discussion about this at the article’s Talk page.

A lot of what is going on around this article is plain nonsense. So if you are interested in the subject/in improving the article, please take a look at January 10th version or January 29th version. Also if you have any suggestions on improving the article, please share.

I've also created a topic about it at Project Journalim. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The logo on this page is the old SITA logo https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/File:SITA_business_logo_and_strapline.jpg

It needs updating to this one https://www.sita.aero/static/images/SITA_LOGO.png

Laurac452 (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blockstack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockstack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:PERCENT "In the body of non-scientific/non-technical articles, percent (American English) or per cent (British English) are commonly used: 10 percent; ten percent; 4.5 per cent. Ranges are written ten to twelve per cent or ten to twelve percent, not ten–twelve per cent or ten to twelve %." Does software application qualify as a "scientific/​technical" article? Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Graydon Hoare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E, WP:LOWPROFILE, subject (me) also wishes to not have such a page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

---

I'm sorry if this is being written in the wrong place, I'm quite unclear on whether this should be added here, to the page in question, or to its talk page (I've now clumsily edited all three). Point is merely that I do not think I am sufficiently notable to warrant a WP page and I do not want one. I've tried to keep a fairly low profile besides answering a handful of interview requests over the past decade, and I think if I am notable it's at most for a single event (the Rust language). I would like the page about me to be deleted.

Please let me know if there's anything I can do to support this request. Thanks. Graydon Hoare (talk) 00:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Neatness and unambiguity require elbow grease. They should not go unappreciated. Pqnlrn (talk) 12:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthieu Aikins, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Coast and New America.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naoto Fukasawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herman Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fugro, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]