Welcome!

Hello, Iamthecheese44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grand Duchess Anastasia Mikhailovna of Russia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mikhailovskoe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding honorifics to people's names. This is against wikipedia style per MOS:HONORIFIC. DrKay (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:BOLD, please do not put people's names in bold text unless referring to the topic of the article in the lead. DrKay (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have added several unhelpful links to the List of most popular given names article. Names should not be linked to articles for historical personages. Either create a new article for the name or leave it as it is. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 01:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Sorry. I should have asked. My bad. --142.176.126.126 (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamthecheese44. I want to welcome you to WikiProject Ancient Egypt. The project is pretty anemic these days, so it's good to see someone else sign up. Let me know if you need anything. A. Parrot (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamthecheese44! Thank you for joining WikiProject Middle-earth and contributing to improve Tolkien-related articles. We are glad to have you join in the effort! Here're some good links and subpages related to our WikiProject.

If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page. Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing! GimliDotNet ^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 20:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I noticed the edit you made to the WPUS supported projects page and wanted to let you know that those projects are not supported by WPUS. I'm not going to revert the changes but I wanted to let you know someone else might and some may take offense. Aside form that, the WPUS project isn't very active. I was the one doing most of the maintenance and I stopped a few months ago. Good initiative though. Please let me know if you have any questions. Kumioko (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the WikiProject Biography template, you submitted the listas parameter as "Idee, Inges". Is this accurate, given the article is named after an art collective and not the name of an individual? --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for helping expand Category:American film actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People should only be in the most specific category that applies to them. Thus if they are in Category:American actresses they should not also be in the actors category. They should not be in a film actors category and the actors category. Ideally Category:American actors should only be a contained category, no articles should be in it. The same should also be true of American singers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as you might be aware the peace symbol or the Campaign for nuclear disarmament symbol has runic origins. Specificially that of the death rune/Algiz/Todesrune. I am currently in discussion on the talk page of the Campaign for nuclear disarmament with another member who actively refuses to accept that this information about the symbols runic origins be included.

I would appreciate your input.

Here are the references supporting the runic origin of the symbol.

1. "Symbol explained", The Eugene Register- Guard, 12 February 1971
2. Foreign Policy in Focus - http://www.fpif.org/articles/a_sign_of_the_times
3. http://www.symbols.com/encyclopedia/24/247.html
4. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,909670,00.html#ixzz28e1dbekl "What's in a Symbol?", Time Magazine, 2 November 1970

Boundarylayer (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Raven-Symoné, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not add links to common terms like "American" and "actress". See WP:OVERLINK. Gimmetoo (talk) 12:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Please stop adding links to common terms. Gimmetoo (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Micah Alberti is not an actress, as you classified him as.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

Following some disagreement among people at WP:AFC/R on whether multi-intersection categories like Category:Black British actresses are helpful or not, I've raised the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories#Multi-intersection categories. Since you were the one who proposed the categories you may want to explain your reasoning there. Technically you could create the categories directly without going through AFC/R at all, but since they're apparently controversial, it may be better to use this opportunity and establish whether we should have them at all. Huon (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And as a semi-pseudo-quasi related topic, the very word "actress" has been labeled as being a sexist hangover from past ages by many and I expect that many of the current categories such as the one you recently tacked onto Charlotte Saunders Cushman will be . . . . . . . . . . ...... discussed shortly. Then likely obsolete. The "correct" term, I believe, is "female actors." Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What on earth is your justification for categorising Les Murray as a New Zealand anthropologist? I know Les well. He is Australian-born, never lived in NZ, and never studied anthropology in anything but a jocular sense. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad. That was a mistake that I caught right after I'd made it. I thought I'd changed it, but my internet's been a little blinky, so I guess I accidentally left it as was. Sorry about that! ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. It would have given Les a great giggle, 'cept he doesn't use a PC. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to report that the work suggest we do it I had done when I created the categories. Some categories may not be so over populated, because there are athletes in the parent category. Now do a subsidiary. --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrés Boira, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that visually impaired skier Andrés Boira represented Spain at the 2006 and 2010 Winter Paralympics with different ski guides? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrés Boira. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 15:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

On 18 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aleix Suñé, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Spanish visually impaired guides Aleix Suñé, Félix Aznar and Arnau Ferrer all skied with blind para-alpine skier Gabriel Gorce? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nyttend (talk 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to ensure you do not add ethnicity/descent categories to biography articles, such as you did at Judi Shekoni, unless the category is supported by reliably sourced article content. You can read more at WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ramón Homs, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ramón Homs is a para-alpine LW6/8 classified standing skier who lost his arm in a motorcycle accident? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ramón Homs. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
		For finishing tenth place on the leaderboard during the February 2013 Wikification drive, with a count of 1 article, Iamthecheese44 (tied with Ynhocky, Safety Cap, and Tomcat7), you are hereby awarded the Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 13:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gabriel Gorce, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that para-alpine B2 classified visually impaired skier Gabriel Gorce was the youngest member of the 2010 Spanish Winter Paralympic team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gabriel Gorce. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Úrsula Pueyo, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that para-alpine skier Úrsula Pueyo was the only member of the 2010 Spanish Winter Paralympic team not to compete in the visually impaired class? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Úrsula Pueyo. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see WP:BLPCAT and note that "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources." Fiona Shaw and similar should not be categorised by religion. Thanks, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You identified Janet Hamill as a possible close paraphrase. can you identify the source, so I can check it out?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did that such a long time ago that I'm no longer 100% sure that this was what I was referring to, but I'm almost certain (maybe 95% sure) that this is the one. It is her official site, after all. Either way, it's still a pretty close match. Sorry about that, I'm usually good with noting that kind of stuff. *bows head in shame* ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have tried that. I did a quick Google search and wasn't turning up anything obvious, (but that isn't so hot for paraphrased), so I thought I would check.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wolfgang Julius, Count of Hohenlohe-Neuenstein may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of national animals may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:100%;"
• |{{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just reverted a few of your edits to some British princes(ses) who were children of a Prince of Wales before the style "Prince NAME of Wales" came about. You'll find the (age old) discussion here: The of Wales Issue DBD 22:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kick-Ass (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{{Use British English|date=July 2011}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up!

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you added the more footnotes tag some months ago to the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram article I thought I'd ask if you feel it still needs it. If so, would you mind pointing me to the specific issues that concern you so I can take a stab at fixing them? Thanks! Gaba ^(talk) 00:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Simplifying_actor.2Factress_gendered_categories. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
		For scoring sixth place on the leaderboard during the October 2013 wikification drive with a total of 2 articles, Iamthecheese44, you are hereby awarded the Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations! :)

Cheers! If I said "I'm miffed!", would you come running or go? (talk) 04:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume III, Issue I, November 2013 Front Cover • General news Membership • Drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Also, I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog by over seven hundred articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a past editor to Thomas Keightley (official) and notifying you are encouraged to participate in the discussion that weighs the relative current name-recognition of the official vs. the author of the same name. This discussion is held at Talk:Thomas Keightley (historian).
The proposal will make Thomas Keightley, by default, go to the article on the writer. And a hatnote at the top stating:

Thus navigational notice referring to the official's article will not be diminished. --Kiyoweap (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States state butterflies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion about the (over)categorization of people by descent at Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people#X people from Y descent overcategorization. Can you temporarily stop the categorization of people by descent to see what the discussion will give as result? Feel free to join it and give your opinion of course. Thanks! Fram (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Just letting you know, the April 2014 backlog drive has commenced! It's the 1st! May Day! May Day - ain't for another month. (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your participation in April 2014 Wikiproject Wikify drive. All of your efforts are appreciated. Skr15081997 (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cheese! I am looking for some help on a Good Article nomination that I am seeking. The article is Alfred V. Verville. He is an American aviation pioneer who designed over 12 planes and is called the elder statesman of American aviation. He's even on a stamp! :) I noticed that you are pretty active on Wikipedia and are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. I can use a second set of eyes to look over the article and make sure the copy is of a high enough quality to pass GAN. I would be forever indebted if you could assist! Also, here are the notes from some preliminary comments so far on the GAN evaluation: https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/Talk:Alfred_V._Verville/GA1 Thanks! :) Nasa-verve (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in a discussion regarding a Wikimedia genealogy project. Questions and comments are welcome on the project page or its corresponding talk page. Thanks for your consideration! --Another Believer _(Talk) 21:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iamthecheese44! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up!

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... be more careful! Would appreciate if you'd fix that stuff. Cordially, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How to pick up more women...

Hello to the members of WikiProject Women writers! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. The proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
		For scoring #8 on the leaderboard during the February 2015 Wikification drive, you are hereby awarded the Working Wikifier's Barnstar! Congratulations!

Cheers! One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia Hooker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 03:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is part mirror, part crowd sources. Anything about a WP:BLP needs a solidly reliable sources. I've removed the material you added to Charles John Tottenham, 9th Marquess of Ely about a presumptive heir. You aren't the only one to have used this as a source! Doug Weller (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Former countries

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Former countries for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (rap) @ 15:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template talk:Marriage#Who is widowed - topic or topic's spouse?, the term "widowed" is unclear and usually refers to the date that the subject of the article died not the date that the spouse died. DrKay (talk) 13:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I explained my edit in the edit summary, to revert that edit without explanation or an edit summary is not just rude, it's disruptive. DrKay (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for what I did and the way I handled it. When I received your message about the widow/widowed issue with the template, I saw your point. I agree with you, it does make the information ambiguous and confusing. I knew I'd done it on a few pages before your message, and so I tried to correct it by clarifying whose death I was referring to (hence the "his/her death" clarification). I tend to be not so good at leaving edit summaries: either I forget or am a bit shy--of course, this was not the case here; I simply handled it unprofessionally. I do apologize for that. I certainly didn't mean to be disruptive. I got caught up in editing and made a bad judgment call.

On a different note, if my previous solution makes things a little complicated, then I am confused as to when the marriage template should be used. Should it be only on living people? I understand not using it for people from perhaps the Middle Ages and before, because that might be a little too confusing or unnecessary (not to mention prone to inaccuracy) when there may not be much data on the person to begin with. I tried to find an answer to this on the Marriage template page and its discussion page, but it doesn't seem to have been brought up, yet. What would you suggest? ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 18:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Iamthecheese44. First, I loved the book from which you take your tag; it was like The X-Files for teens. Secondly, please stop adding months and days to the "spouse" field in infoboxes since the template is incapable of reading them: Though you're putting them in, they don't show up on the live page. So all you're doing is making extra work for other editors to clean up the infobox. Thank you for ceasing this. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and the compliment. :) The marriage template does allow for the dates to be read, as can be seen when you hover the cursor over the year. The template is just showing it in a concise manner. It's actually the default if you were to just put "{{Template:Marriage}}": the date would at first appear as "m. 2015", but if you hovered over the date it would give you the date that was imputed into the template. Ex.:

. This is why the dotted lines appear underneath the "m." and the given year. This is how the template page tells users to input the marriage info]. I actually only recently figured this out, so I know it's not necessarily immediately obvious if you're not looking for it. The use of the dates for this can be seen on a number of notable pages, such as those of European royal families, etc. Perhaps it's a topic for discussion on the template's talk page? I've checked and I don't see any discussion on it so far. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info; I was unaware. That said, the dates were in fact not showing up on the live pages — from what you say, I'm not sure why not. I guess going forward, when you make those additions, you might want to check to see if they're showing up; otherwise it's "junk code." With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 19:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing to see you - a very experienced Wikipedian! - change members of the House of Bernadotte to Bonaparte. Pls correct them all! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry! I don't know how I managed to do that. I've gone through all of them and I believe they are all corrected. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prince Oscar Bernadotte may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | royal house = [[House of Bernadotte|Bernadotte]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I was just trying to rollback all the edits done by Thechicogarage on Charlie Chaplin, but because your edit came first I ended up reverting it by accident (Twinkle being confusing). I wrote "not useful" in the edit summary but actually yours was a good edit. So sorry for that. I'll add it back now. --Loeba (talk) 12:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter II of Yugoslavia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Infobox royalty
• ] <small>(1970–2013)</small><br> [[St. George's Church, Oplenac]], [[Serbia]] <small>{since 2013)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us!
	Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - a Year of Science initiative Hosts: Women in Red, Women Scientists Sponsor: WikiEdu April-December 2016 #wikiwomeninred #yearofscience #contentgap

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

Hi Iamthecheese44. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tamara Davis (astrophysicist). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tamara Davis. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tamara Davis – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wgolf (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in contributing articles to Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)? It needs contributors to increase diversity of content from different countries and bring about large scale improvements. The idea at some point will be to host a National Contest related to your country of interest. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamthecheese44. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you don't use edit summaries regularly, but please use them in your edits more often. You've been told before about this. It helps give people a sense of what you are trying to do in your contributions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I will do so. Sometimes I am just going really quick and I forget. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Occasionally forgetting is one thing, but frequently not using them can make others worried. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding my voice to the choir: It's a big help to your collaborators if you take the time to add an edit summary. Eric ^talk 19:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Iamthecheese44, I noticed your edit. Why is that if I may ask so? Lotje (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As it is, it is a red link. I tried placing "File" and "Image" in front of it, and both led to red links. I decided to just put it in a comment instead of deleting it, in case anyone else was able to figure out what to do with it. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 1 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the very first newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, see below) Progress report: Since the Projects very first edit 9 december 2002 by User:Dan Koehl, which eventually became the WikiProject Genealogy, different templates were developed, and the portal Portal:Genealogy was founded by User:Michael A. White in 2008. Over the years a number of articles has been written, with more or less association to genealogy. And, very exciting, there is a proposal made on Meta by User:Another Believer to found a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you havnt done so already. Future: The future of the Genealogy project on the English Wikipedia, and a potential creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input. You can discuss on the projects talk page how the project should be developed sign as member or supporter at the projects member list Check the goal, tasks and see if something interest you. put the User box on your user page by inserting the Template:User WikiProject Genealogy with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}. develop or update the Portal:Genealogy? in case you havnt read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy founder and coordinator Dan Koehl To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery Dan Koehl (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 2 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Progress report: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogy connect (In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial) At m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we should propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project? Read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future: The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input. You can discuss on the projects talk page how the project should be developed sign as member or supporter at the projects member list put the User box on your user page by inserting the Template:User WikiProject Genealogy with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}. develop or update the Portal:Genealogy? in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Newsletter Nr 3 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Request: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective. At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote. In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list. Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future: in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Mail list is created: The project email list is now created and ready to use! Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy Future: Discuss the next step, the creation of a meta Genealogy user group, list yourself as m:interested participant and vote on which name should be used for the user group. in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Regarding your edits at Ava Acres: Please explain how a tweet of her saying "Thanks for the birthday wishes" is a source for what year she was born in. Her birth date (specifically the year) is quite obviously missing from internet sources and we need to be responsible in not adding it here without a reliable source. We add it here and it gets repeated all over the internet, and thus we are responsible for spreading unverifiable information. --Laser brain (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've noticed that you edit pages that contain genealogies, including royal lineages. I don't know how to edit those, so I'm requesting help if you are willing to edit some pages. The Danish royal family tree needs Countess Inge and Prince Richard removed (late husband of Princess Benedikte), the Spanish royal family tree has the late husband of Infanta Pilar and the Japanese Imperial House had two extinct male lines(I removed them myself but it needs a small fix).--Killuminator (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went through and fixed the stuff you listed, as well as some other things that needed tweaking. Thanks for letting me know! ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also, regarding the Japanese one - I think Prince Katsura should be also removed on the same basis as the other two princes. Daughters who married commoners and lost their royal status are also questionable additions, but I will leave that at your discretion. If removed, the tree will look less cluttered. --Killuminator (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is something to be discussed on the talk page. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Clubjustin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dan Finnerty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 05:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your thoughtful edits on various articles, and I would like to get your opinion about a matter. From time to time, there have been some editors who have changed Wikipedia article titles about noble families from "House of [name]", such as changing the article about the House of Merode to Merode family. Such editors might believe that the term "House of" only applies to royal dynasties, not to noble families. However, my impression has always been that various high-ranking European noble families of ancient lineage, such as the House of Arenberg or the House of Ligne, may properly be referred to as such, and not simply as the Ligne family. You have in-depth knowledge about all things noble and royal, and I have great respect for your opinion, so I would be grateful if you could please let me know your very brief thoughts on this issue. Many thanks for your kind help! -- Blairall (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Iamthecheese44. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 5, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) A demo wiki is up and running! Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one! You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018! Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Hey, I noticed you marked yourself as a member of WikiProject Wikify and you are currently listed as active. I was wondering if you would be able to assist with our current backlog reduction plan. While traditional drives are more structured month-long sprints by WikiProject Wikify members, there is currently lacking activity within the project and in order to significantly reduce the incredible backlog, members are encouraged to review all articles marked with the Underlinked Template Message - {{underlinked}} - a list of which can be found here - to analyze the worthiness of the template message on the given article. Articles that have nothing to link or are have had wikilinks sufficiently added should have the template removed to clear the backlog and make it easier for editors to find articles in genuine need of wikification. This can be done by any editor; however, all editors should consider joining if they haven't done so already. Thank you!

The Novac (talk) 04:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has edited Lyndsy Fonseca, you may or may not wish to join a discussion at Talk:Lyndsy Fonseca#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the template documentation, "New York City, US" is correct, rather than "New York City, New York, U.S." as in this edit. (Also, please don't link terms next to each other - it makes them look like a single link). Nikkimaria (talk) 13:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding marriage templates to infoboxes. The future of Wikipedia will include structuring data to better translate content across different languages of Wikipedias, and what you are doing encourages this trend toward multilingual accessibility. I noticed what you were doing in Esther Peterson and appreciate that and your other similar edits. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert in part your good faith edits to the Pamela Harriman article. Pamela became an United States citizen in 1971. She was appointed United States Ambassador to France. United States officials; President of the United States, members of Congress, United States ambassadors, etc., used the American style of The Honorable not the British style of The Honourable. You may want to read the The Honourable article; the article has detailed information about usage in the United Kingdom, the United States, etc. Thank you-RFD (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jschnur. An edit that you recently made to Sonequa Martin-Green seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jschnur (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iamthecheese44,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Prince George and Princess Charlotte ancestry sandbox for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Family tree of the British royal family.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Anaxial (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have just been looking through my list of sandboxes and it appears that I made a typo (I seem to have accidentally omitted the "/" that should have been at the beginning of the link) when attempting to create a sandbox in order to store my information. My apologies. I was trying create a sandbox for the purpose of storing my work somewhere while I compile references for it before posting it to the actual biography pages. I originally thought that you had deleted one of my sandboxes, which would be why my previous message may have come across as having somewhat of an annoyed tone to it. Again, sorry about the confusion, and thank you for alerting me to my mistake. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 02:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Award for just the fun of receiving an award
	Yo! Tell me how it feels like getting such a special award. Big Fat White Dove (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ACCESS#Text which states "Avoid using smaller font sizes in elements that already use a smaller font size, such as infoboxes, navboxes and reference sections." Thanks. --woodensuperman 10:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, in here, you changed all the "trump" to "drumpf" - I assume that was through some trump to drumpf extension, right? You should make sure that extension is disabled when editing anything with Trump, or else that will get saved in an edit Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And here. General Ization ^Talk 13:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your edit at Imran Khan. I misread your first edit and thought you were just deleting the one disputed child, per some recent edit warring. :) ^†Basilosauridae❯❯❯Talk 04:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AntiCedros. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Robert De Niro have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. I assume it was unintentional, however, you have already been informed about your "Drumpf" problem more than a week ago. Please make sure, it doesn't continue to happen. AntiCedros (talk) 09:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamthecheese44. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century American singers ‎, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supporters [edit] At 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running! [edit] You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019! Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! Hello Iamthecheese44, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Hello Iamthecheese44! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the {{reply to|GeekInParadise}} tag. Happy editing! GeekInParadise (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @GeekInParadise: Yes, I am interested in remaining active. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the confirmation GeekInParadise (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anna Brassey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Posthumous

Gotfrid Köchert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scion

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please add edit summaries to your changes so that we can follow the changes you have made. Thanks Anna (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have revamped WikProject Genealogy with new goals. Your help and feedback are appreciated. Tea and crumpets (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Children of Charlemagne, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Wilson's War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this cat should remain for every footballer from Scotland. Please re-instate on those you have removed it from when adding the Footballers from Renfrewshire. It is correct for both to be present. Thanks. Crowsus (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is a non-diffusing category. I have reverted some more changes. GiantSnowman 13:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Iamthecheese44. I see you have more than 42000 edits and are thus a very, very experienced editor. I am still more or less a novice. I usually add lists of siblings and children to biographies in which I get involved. Does Wikipedia have a rule about how to style such lists? I thought it was good enough when the article is about Mr. Smith to call his children John and Peter and I do the same with the children of the Marquess of Londonderry, whose surname is Stewart. Why repeat "Stewart" each time? The reader already knows that their surname is Stewart. Furthermore, I do not think they are Lords and Ladies. His eldest son will become Lord Londonderry when he succeeds his father in the honour. The younger sons who do not succeed will normally not become Lords, they will be commoners. Am I wrong? This is important for me as I have written quite a few such lists. If they all need to be changed to include the surname and add an appropriate title, that will be a big amount of work to be done. I try to be a disciplined Wikipedian and if something is wrong according to MOS or well established usage or even common sense, I will correct it once I have understood what the rule is and why it should be as you say. I will then dutifully change them all, but first I need to be sure. Somebody else might come along and tell me to remove the surname again and to add "Honourable" before the name, etc. I hope you will understand my hesitation. With many thanks Johannes Schade (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sons of British monarchs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is already covered by Princes of the United Kingdom, we should not be further dividing people by gender

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question re: one of the categories you added: Is it really a music-related YouTube channel? I'm not sure. It makes fun of bad singing, but it's really a comedy channel. Up to you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help keshabuzo@gmail.com YTKeshab (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mortimer family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Iamthecheese44. Thank you very much for your intervention on the article "Frances Talbot, Countess of Tyrconnell". I appreciate your careful well-balanced linking, neither over nor under, the correction of the punctuation. You seem to be always right in these matters. Of course, you are the cheese, a member of the GOCE, and a very experienced Wikipedian (almost 46000 edits!). I certainly have to learn a lot from you. However: -3189 is a harsh treatment. The major item in there is the timeline table. Obviously, it repeats information that is already in the article, but so does the Infobox. The timeline is presented collapsed and therefore occupies a single line. I have added such timeline tables to about 60 biographies. I am tempted to bring it back. There might however be a very good reason (MOS?) for this deletion that I do not know about. Why had the image of the miniature have to go? I thought it was quite cute. Is there some issue with it? The Latin text in the photo is difficult to read, so I added a table with the text in it, but perhaps there should not be such lengthy Latin in the English Wikipedia. I found out you are an expert in family trees, e.g. the article "Family tree of Belgian monarchs". I am astonished you did not touch mine. Most editors seem to ignore the family trees that I have added on about 80 biographies. Perhaps it should have been presented collapsed. Besides, I have been kindly reproached, some time ago, by user User:Martin of Sheffield for using dual dates. MOS:OSNS states that dates "should be assumed to have begun 1st of January". I thought I had fixed them all, but I see that there are some left in "Frances Talbot, Countess of Tyrconnell", e.g. in the Infobox, which gives her birth date as "9 March 1730/1", which, according to MOS, should be simply "9 March 1731". My fault. I will fix this. There are still a couple of other minor issues that I would like to discuss with You, but I fear I have already taken too much of your precious time. Please accept, Iamthecheese44, the expression of my highest consideration, Johannes Schade (talk) 08:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your edit incorrectly changed the abbreviations of degrees: "The Manual of Style on abbreviations, above, eschews the use of periods with acronyms. For example, use MD and PhD, not M.D. and Ph.D."
thanks, 73.69.184.160 (talk) 15:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophie Lascelles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Lascelles (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 18:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at John Spencer-Churchill, 11th Duke of Marlborough. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit summary here: you are quite right, it was sheer laziness on my part to revert the whole edit; my apologies. --JBL (talk) 20:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of la Société entomologique de France has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Monster Iestyn (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Presidents of la Société entomologique de France has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Monster Iestyn (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, back in 2017 I requested some help with a family tree section on a page for a royal family. We have the same issue now on the page Norwegian royal family. The king's brother-in-law died and several editors tried to paint his box red but couldn't do it properly. We ended up making it look like the king and queen and the king's surviving sister are all dead. Can you help out with that? It would be very appreciated. --Killuminator (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I’ll take a look at it. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 10:34, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & thank you for all the good work you do! This, however, was clearer & more informative before, for the average reader of an encyclopedia. I was going to revert it but saw a bunch of other little fixings & thangs which I don't know what they mean and I was afraid to damage that part. Why not spell their names out? Or will you be around to fix what you did when they die?--SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in going through nobility articles removing poor sourcing, I noticed you had added refs to findagrave and thepeerage.com pretty recently (mid-2020). These are unreliable sources, with the latter deprecated. You also added a citation to History of Royal Women to the above article, which is a blog and therefore unacceptable unless the author is an expert (which they are definitely not). I don't know if you've continued using these sources but I thought I should bring this to your attention if you weren't already aware. Thanks, JoelleJay (talk) 20:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at David Cholmondeley, 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the concern, and I do not make a habit of doing it, but the content in question was literally stated at the very beginning of the article. The information I changed wasn't new to the page, and what was there previously had been in direct contradiction to what had been written earlier. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 00:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:13th-century Russian princesses has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]