Format
Check WP:PW's style guide. It is to pass WP:Jargon. There aren't enough editors with the project to change all the articles to the out of universe format, so some aren't correct.--WillC 23:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Hogans return to WCW, Austins had probs
Hi,
The user reverted my edit as it is well documented without reference required. I'll however supply one shorty. It's been placed back for the mean time.
Regards,
ToonIsALoon (talk) 09:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- If it happened, you have to source it when you add it. Also, please don’t simply revert me without seeing the revisions. You’ll see that over time, minor edits were made, including but not limited to removing his image. As you can see, after you reverted me he no longer has a main image. Ive Cena Nuff (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
Please read the warnings. Future events are not to be added to wrestlers articles. This means don't add that Punk will be in the MITB match at WM, or that Michaels will take on Undertaker, etc. I have seen you add stuff like this multiple times even though the warning is right there. TJ Spyke 18:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Montel Vontavious Porter. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please don't remove sourced info under the guise of reverting someone else. MVP is also known by Hassan Hamin Assad, it's even on his arrest record. Please be more careful with what you remove in future. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 09:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shawn Michaels. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. TJ Spyke 21:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- There were 2 other editors but they basically split up the reverts. Technically I could have just reported you though since you had more than 3 reverts when I gave you the warning. If either one of them revert again I will give them warnings too. TJ Spyke 23:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Matt Hardy, you will be blocked from editing. Dcheagle (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Umm, I was removing the part where some moron asked if he died. I was removing vandilism. Ive Cena Nuff (talk) 10:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)