Welcome to kellerGraham's Talk Page.

Archives

Lists, Among others, Saint-Michel-de-Laval, a.k.a. "Ville Saint-Michel" Is the above statement correct? as well as Saint-Michel-Nord Does or did such an area accually exist? Two articles are currently linked to it, namely Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel and Viau. Would it really be part of Saint-Michel (Montreal), Quebec? Peter Horn 19:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found this web site Ville Saint-Michel. I guess this answers most of my questions. Peter Horn 02:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your consideration.... Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you may be aware off and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Peter Horn 16:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Joedon123. Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the current locations of all of the bus stops see ^[1].

Ref. no. 1 (no. 2 in the article) is not up to date. The entrance on rue Gohier at the corner of boulevard Côte-Vertu has been eliminated and Q17 on boulevard Décarie at the corner of rue Macdonald has been eliminated as well.

Take a walk around Terminus Côte-Vertu and you'll see that this reference and the note are still relevant. Peter Horn 15:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The stops were up to date until today (the addition of 268 to the 17 stop). What I was referring to was the fact that the entrance on the corner of Cote-Vertu and Gohier has been removed.

Thank you for uploading Image:08-04-05 12-39 STM Cartier OPUS Vending Machines Wikipedia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk:Sdrtirs, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The route numbers that you assigned do not correspond to the numbers that pop out of the website. Incidentally, the website does provide route maps! Example: 31 Timetable and [31/36 Map]. Please clarify. Peter Horn 20:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to tell you that I figured it out myself, but you beat me to it. Only the local lines have a map... Peter Horn 00:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT)#Coming changes Copy and paste: The Montreal Gazette of Friday Aug 8, 2008 reported that as of Aug 25, 2008 all the route information will be obsolete. Many routes will be sent to Boulevard René Levesque. Peter Horn 00:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, Please see Talk:Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT)#Dead links. Peter Horn User talk 23:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the time being let's leave it. Peter Horn 02:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make a == History section == from the time before the actual building was inaugerated. Prior there was a terminal of sorts at the NE corner Henri-Bourassa/Millen, where there is now a small park. Peter Horn 01:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map Peter Horn 01:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Gagné for CIT Roussillon Peter Horn 01:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have created articles for CRT Lanaudière (including details for MRC de L'Assomption and MRC Les Moulins) and CIT La Presqu'Île. For linking to the article, instead of using MRC de L'Assomption please use RTC de la MRC de L'Assomption (Réseau de transport collectif de la MRC de L'Assomption) and for MRC Les Moulins use MRC Les Moulins public transit(Transport en commun de la MRC Les Moulins). The current MRC red link names should only be used for the regions themselves not the public transit systems, which are now correctly titled. Other red links that I have eliminated are for Terminus Repentigny (AMT), Terminus Terrebonne (AMT) and Terminus Saint-Eustache (AMT), which now redirect to paragraphs within the articles on the bus services that use them. If you use the preferred redirect shown here, when the information is spun off to create a free standing article, only the redirect needs to be changed to still lead to the proper place. I think it would also be appropriate to create a similar paragraph for Autopark Georges Gagné within the CIT Roussillon article. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is it, is it a rail line, a subway, a bus line?PB666 ^yap 00:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not a bright question. I left a note on his talk page right beneath your reply to him. Peter Horn 17:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Copy and paste fom my talk page) Peter Horn 01:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any notable controversies that may exist. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic according to reliable, published sources. While consideration should be given to creating interest in reading more of the article, the lead nonetheless must not "tease" the reader by hinting at—but not explaining—important facts that will appear later in the article. The lead should contain no more than four paragraphs, should be carefully sourced as appropriate, and should be written in a clear, accessible style so as to invite a reading of the full article.

PB666 ^yap 20:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have appended the lead to add essential information it was lacking. I should also note that the page on the metro green line is also lacking adequate context, so that article was tagged with "too short". WP:NOTDIRECTORY WP:INDISCRIMINATE. In describing a railway station I would think its function comes first, the link you claim was in the article, not. I added it however. This guy should be told to leave Montreal Metro alone, because he does not know what he is talking about. Peter Horn 01:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Peter Horn 01:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1]. As of this coming Monday Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT) as well as Terminus Brossard-Panama (AMT) will have to be revised. Ditto for Central Station (Montreal), Bonaventure (Montreal Metro) and perhaps even Lucien-L'Allier (Montreal Metro). Peter Horn 16:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(articles still needed)

• CIT Chambly-Richelieu-Carignan
• CIT Haut-Saint-Laurent
• CIT Le Richelain
• OMIT Ville de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu A single-city authority (OMIT)
• OMIT Ville de Sainte-Julie A single-city authority (OMIT)

The first three of them are each linked to a lot of articles. Peter Horn 17:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bois-Franc (AMT)

Bois-Franc is a commuter rail station on the AMT Deux-Montagnes Line in the Greater Montreal, Quebec, Canada area. The Bois-Franc station was intended to be an intermodal station with the Orange Line which was to be extended to Rue de Salaberry at this end. Bois-Franc is in Fare Zone 2, and currently has 754 parking spaces.

The proposed Salaberry metro station would have been too far from the current Bois-Franc train station to be of intermodal use and the proposed Bois-Franc metro station would have been too far from ether the current Bois-Franc train station or the current Du Ruisseau (AMT) train station but it would rather have been next to the former Monkland Station. Agreed??

Peter Horn 03:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bois-Franc (AMT) and Du Ruisseau (AMT) had already both been revised accordingly. Peter Horn 00:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Keller,

The following user User:Pdeitiker (User talk:Pdeitiker) should be told to stick with biology and leave transportation etc. alone. Agreed? Peter Horn 00:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste from this dangerous user's talk page:

let's go through what a lead is. A lead describes breifly what is in the main article. The previous lead did not, as is true for most of the metro articles. The lead in this article did a green line^{[clarification needed]} but not even mention the rapid transit line, and yet it mentioned an art gallery and a balcone that is shut off. Do you go to a rapid transit station to pear over a shut off balcone, to stare at art, or perhaps to 'catch a subway'. I don't know who is writing these rail station pages, but a fundemental read of WP:LEAD is in store for all.PB666 ^yap 03:17, 23 August 2008 (UTC). When he asks "busiest with what?" He shows the shallowness of his "thinking" (Cows going thru???). He should be stopped ASAP. Peter Horn 01:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see what User:Pdeitiker did to Line 1 Green (Montreal Metro)? Do you agree? Peter Horn 15:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Keller,

Bois-Franc (AMT) STL 902 is still a "de facto" express in as much as no additional stops have been added in Laval since the STL took over. Peter Horn 20:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The STL itself still displays "Express 902" on the route display panel at the front (top) of the buses on the 902 run. I verified that this morning when I saw a 902 bus go by. Peter Horn 14:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I removed the word Express back when the AMT let this route go. I assumed that the STL wasn't going to market this as an Express as it clearly isn't

Alex@MTRL (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The STL is run by twits who come to work in their own car, ditto for the AMT and the STM. The service on the 902 was never great because the AMT was unable and/or unwilling to synchronise the 902 completely with the train at Bois-Franc in both directions. And then they wonder why the park and ride at Terminus le Carrefour (AMT) is always empty. Another "brilliant" move was to close the Saint-Martin (AMT) station. Peter Horn 00:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alex,

Before I go further ahead, please give me your opinion. Which one of the two versions would you prefer or would either one be equally acceptable?

1. Frontenac is a station on the Montreal Metro rapid transit system in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, operated by the Société de transport de Montréal (STM).
2. Frontenac is a station on the Montreal Metro rapid transit system, operated by the Société de transport de Montréal (STM) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (would not appear in main texts.) Peter Horn 15:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to agree. When a metro station has more than two entrances it becomes messy to put all of them in the paragraph after "It is located at Blank ," So lets revise the info box(es), provided they are not protected. Peter Horn 21:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You (Peter Horn) recently added an incomplete and inaccurate table to Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu public transit. You should work on it in your own user sandbox that I created here: User:Peter Horn/sandbox When you have prepared it properly, only then should you move it into the article. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What, if anything, is wrong with this list?

• Bus routes

Corrected table:

Peter Horn 01:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left the following note on S's talk page Quote

The "offending" list was taken "copy and paste" from

Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT)

OMIT Ville de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu

A single-city authority (OMIT

Corrected / updated table:

Peter Horn 01:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No "sand box" needed nor required. Make the corrections as need be, but do not just delete. User:Kellergraham had found nothing wrong with it. Peter Horn 23:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Unquote Peter Horn 23:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Main article: Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu_public_transit

A single-city authority (OMIT

Thanks for your input. Peter Horn 13:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created Île-Bigras (AMT) Station, because it was being consistently removed from articles. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The AMT has recently put into service a new express from Chevrier Park-n-Ride (AMT) to Nuns' Island via Terminus Brossard-Panama (AMT), but I can't find the details (schedule & route, etc). May be you have better luck. Peter Horn 15:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Île-des-Soeurs (AMT) Located where on Nuns' Island? Peter Horn 01:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Make that Terminus Île-des-Soeurs Peter Horn 01:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McGill Street & Talk:McGill Street Lets at least make a stub for McGill Street (Montreal) so as to avoid future confusion. Peter Horn 01:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please see Island of Montreal & Talk:Island of Montreal#Picture of map outdated. The same outdated map, or a version thereoff, still "disgraces" many Montreal related articles. Peter Horn 19:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone threatened to delete Papineau Avenue. I quietly removed

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Kellergraham" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

. see "2008-10-18T02:20:28" in the revision history. Peter Horn 20:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the creation of a new article about this bus company. As someone who has a knowledge of transportation in Quebec, I would appreciate any input you could provide.-Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recently updated the Blainville line section with the same changes I had made a while ago but you had reversed saying that they we're false. I updated the page's track schematic saying that there is a passing siding between Blainville and Ste-Therese instead of it being single tracked but you said this was false. But that is impossible. I just gave the example on the recent changes of trains 190 and 193 which both leave Blainville and Ste-Therese heading towards each other and they must meet because of their schedule. Train 190 departs Blaiville at 17:00 and arrives at Ste-Therese at 17:17 and train 193 departs Ste-Therese at 17:10 and arrives at Blainville at 17:21. Therefore there must be a passing siding and it's impossible it is only single tracked in that section. You can verify this using a program such as Google Earth. There is a passing siding just north of Chemin de la Cote-St-Louis E.

Secondly, I'm not entirely sure who first put this up on the track schematic but the schematic shows a double track section in between Eastern Junction and the overpass of the Blainville-St-Jerome line. There is in fact two tracks here but the switch at eastern junction does not allow eastbound trains to switch onto the northern track.There is only as switch that allows westbound trains to switch onto the southern track at the point right after the Blainville-St-Jerome line overpass therefore this double track sections seems useless to the AMT and they won't be using it. You can also verify this using a program suck as Google Earth. The only solution to this is for the AMT to build and extra switch to allow eastbound trains to transfer to the northern track but there are no plans in any AMT publications about this. Should this double track section be removed from the schematic since it is unusable by the Repentigny-Maschouche Line until the AMT says otherwise?

Boo2277 (talk) 01:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I haven't been up to Ste-Therese in a while either but when I look at that siding and it's configuration, it's looks like an inconvenience because of the switches yet again. It would seem much more logical for the AMT to use the siding further north since the Sicard siding can't be accessed by inbound trains unless they enter Ste-Therese station and then back onto the siding in reverse. I'll have to up to Ste-Therese and check it out. I'm off school now so I should have time to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boo2277 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMT Delson-Candiac.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:AMT Delson-Candiac.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:AMT Delson-Candiac.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My French is crap, so I'm not going to get annoyed that my changes to the Longueuil RTL bus routes have been rolled back. I'm interpretting with a probably less than basic knowledge of the language. Anyway, for the sake of being concise, could you list the routes? I see that this is one of your interests, and all of the other MTL area transit providers have these on their pages. Mr. Vitale (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kellergraham,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keller, The AMT and the STL have revised their websites and the references no longer make sense. I have started with Angrignon (Montreal Metro) and have attempted te update the references on some of the termini articles yet a lot is left to be done.

Peter Horn User talk 21:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Bois-Franc (AMT) and all other articles (pages) that have bus links to the Société de transport de Laval let it be known that all external links and reference links need to be updated. Peter Horn User talk 00:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Bell Centre#Strange civic number. Peter Horn User talk 22:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Agence métropolitaine de transport and the Société de transport de Laval have revamped their respective websites, leaving a "dog's breakfast" of "dead links" all over the place. Peter Horn User talk 03:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 03:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I just noticed User talk:Kellergraham#AMT and STL links on terminus articles above. Peter Horn User talk 03:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kellergraham. You have new messages at Template talk:AMT color.
Message added 22:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KG, You are no doubt aware that all Montreal Metro stations etc. have dead links. Peter Horn User talk 21:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kellergraham,
Please see Talk:Peel Street, Montreal#Lost hotel. Would you perchance remember anything? Peter Horn User talk 19:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Please see Saint-Michel Boulevard (Montreal) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Michel Boulevard (Montreal) Peter Horn User talk