Archives

1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

SYR3: Invito al ĉielo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jim O'Rourke

SYR5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jim O'Rourke

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Millpond Years has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 16:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Farewell to the Shade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable record, fails to meet WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 16:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable; it has been reviewed by AllMusic, a notable publication, and appears in several books – do a Google Books search. Lachlan Foley 16:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on reverting The Scream, Join Hands and Juju where as new reviews and productive changes were added and explained. Stop reverting me please. Please refrain from deleting content you do not agree with, as you did to these articles. Disruptive genre-related edits made to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Carliertwo (talk) 10:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Image Has Cracked, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pinkerton (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Disintegration (The Cure album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Disintegration (The Cure album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Cure may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/coms2/summary_0286-6188730_ITM |title=Article: Slowly but Surely, Hip Hop Is Gaining a South.(''The Orlando Sentinel'' <nowiki>| AccessMyLibrary – Promoting Library Advocacy

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rozz Williams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''Deathwish'' (EP; (1984)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blinking Lights and Other Revelations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Under the Radar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour on Juju is wp:vandalism: stop reverting please. I already warned you in May on your page. I had to re-add once again Sounds'review!!! and revert a blog review that was not a wp:reliable source. And finally, as this lp is mainly considered as post-punk (see the review of Allmusic here), we have to revert the other content which was wp:undue. Carliertwo (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a) I wrote here that Piero Scaruffi is a blog: it's not considered as a wp:reliable source. Make research: this has already been discussed many times on WP.

b) I first included a review of this famous paper that is Sounds (magazine) on 3 May 2013. I counted your edits: you reverted this sounds review three times, first on 5 May, (see here)], and once again on 5 May, (see here) and finally 2 June, (see here). This is wp:vandalism. Are you lazy, is it too much to ask to read other people's contributions before to click on the button "undo", seriously! Don't ever do this again! Discuss on the talk page when you disagree but stop reverting. Your edits are wp:disruptive.

c) The manual of Style of an album doesn't encourage half-baked propositions like naming a section: genre connection. You don't respect wp:neutral point of view in this case. Read the professionnal Juju reviews written by Allmusic (read here), Sounds (magazine) (read here) and The Guardian (read 3). You'll see that this genre you desesperate to connect this LP with, is not mentionned once. Allmusic qualified this Lp as "a post-punk classic" and onky with this term, they didn't write a gothic classic. You always have to wp:STICKTOSOURCE, if you don't it is wp:orginal research. Regarding the parts you added from Paytress's biography, it's far too long and there are not from professionnal critics. Chainsaw is not a writer: he's like Piero Scaruffi. Who cares of what he's saying. He's not a critic. Same remark for Phil Oakey. Chainsaw and Phil Oakey opinions should not be worked into an article about Juju- they haven't made any dent into their career or critical credibility, their opinions mean nothing. As compared to the other opinions out there that say "this lp is post-punk". These two persons are no where the others - which is all that should be included. A marginal opinion is definitely notable for inclusion, if the source is reliable - and if the article is avoiding any issues with undue weight, which is my issue here. The article should establish post-punk a the main genre.Carliertwo (talk) 16:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the totality of album articles across WP, I looked at a random sample of 10 articles from Category:FA-Class Album articles, Discogs is never put at the bottom of the page in external links. I note that you have never given a single valiod reason for adding this Discogs site. Wikipedia article about Discogs says in the lead users are continually adding previously unlisted releases to the site over time: this means that Discogs is a non-professionnal site. Therefore, it hasn't got its place on a wiki article. Carliertwo (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Discogs is not approved by a very large majority of WP users in a discussion: Read here. This is my Last Warning: don't even try to make me waste my time anymore by pushing this once again or there'll will be sanctions. Your agressive behaviour has to stop. Be polite and cite guidelines when you disagree, you don't seem to know them, wp:reliable source for instance. Carliertwo (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit summary There are times to create redlinks and I figured that these topics could have articles someday, so I linked them. Do you disagree? I don't know anything about using "and" in infoboxes, but I don't know why we wouldn't. I remove excess spacing because it makes it more intelligible in my browser window. If you want to respond, please let me know with {{tb}} or write on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think if we use "and" in one infobox parameter then we must use it in all parameters to be indiscriminate, including even the genre parameter. Personally I am opposed to that, and I think it would make more sense for Wikipedia to treat these fields as lists and use semicolons instead of commas to seperate list items, but for now, commas are next best. Lachlan Foley 22:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Separators Why would we separate list items with semicolons? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that semicolons are more appropriate than commas in basic, threadbare lists with no prose; I could be wrong Lachlan Foley 22:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article, Pornography (album), has just had a GA review. Go on it's talk page to see it and see what you can do to improve the article. EditorE (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've started the review page of the Pornography album GAN, but there are some issues that need to be sorted out before I can do a full review. FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pornography (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte Sometimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Introduction to... Elliott Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XO (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished my review of Placebo and placed it on hold for seven days pending changes to address my concerns.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the GAN has failed. The Lead remains below standard and does not adequately summarise the article. Other problems are indicated on the talkpage. I hope you continue with your fine work on the article and also consider assessing some of the other GA candidates.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:BrianMolkoLyonNovembre09.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:03, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Heathen Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Carter

In the Shadow of the Sun (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Score

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

CD1 (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hackney

Why Call It Anything (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mark Burgess

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Sound may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Borland home on a plane.<ref name="Michael Dudley interview"/> The band split up in early 1988.<ref name="Trouser Press"/
• * "Sense of Purpose (What Are We Going to Do"/"Point of No Return" (1981)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, I'm afraid gothic rock is indeed a subgenre of alternative rock. If you look at the Wikipedia page for gothic rock, it will explain. Furthermore, Christian Death is under the Wikiproject Alternative music, of which I am a member. We at the project take care of articles related to alternative rock, which is why I added Category:American alternative rock bands. Given that critical sources state gothic rock's alternativeness, I ask you to please not revert my edit. If you would like further explanation, you can check goth rock's page at Allmusic, or consult the members at the Wikiproject. Thanks! Sbrianhicks (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grandaddy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grandaddy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Grandaddy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Grandaddy to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grandaddy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grandaddy for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion at https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews - there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. Do not add his reviews to review charts, or his opinions in reception sections. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source several times. 16:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jam (TV series).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Good Luck (Basement Jaxx song) single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Witch Trials.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vibing Up the Senile Man (Part One), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Perry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Witch Trials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sound. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Garlands page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Another Green World, Marquee Moon, and Daydream Nation, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 14:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Cannibal Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last House on the Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Video nasty page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ariel Pink

added a link pointing to Dropbox

Demons of the Mind

added a link pointing to Time Out

Figure 8 (album)

added a link pointing to American Beauty (film)

Hell Night

added a link pointing to Time Out

The Burning (film)

added a link pointing to Time Out

The House by the Cemetery

added a link pointing to Time Out

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Fun House (The Stooges album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 06:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the ridiculous genres listed on Fun House, it was only sensible. Lachlan Foley (talk) 09:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vivadixiesubmarinetransmissionplot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ultravox page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help) and an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lifeblood (album)

added a link pointing to Everything Must Go (album)

Magazine (band)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

The Holy Bible (album)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

Ultravox

added a link pointing to The Sunday Mail

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Info4allthepeople reported by User:Lachlan Foley (Result: Submitter blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This sockpuppet case mentions your name; perhaps you will be interested in offering your thoughts in the section for comments. Best wishes! Binksternet (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joy (Skids album)

added a link pointing to The Associates

Know Your Enemy (Manic Street Preachers album)

added a link pointing to Ocean Spray

The Lotus Eaters (band)

added a link pointing to The Associates

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Without You I'm Nothing (Placebo album) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

OK, what's going on? If know the Manics, then you will know that tagging a song that went to #23 by one of the biggest bands of that era for notability is not on. It isn't 1995, and Wikipedia isn't writing letters to NME about how shite Menswear was. --Shirt58 (talk) 07:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have started to add tags at the top of several articles, concerning some of their singles, this is not appropriate. By doing this, you unilaterally discredit all the work that has been done by the other users. For Downside Up for instance, you put an tag whereas there are 8 references. Add {fact needed} in the body of the article would be more relevant.

Concerning this demand of merging the articles about the "Candyman" single with the Tinderbox album, it is out of question. Their wp:notability is proved. This singer was on the cover of Mojo (magazine) in October 2014, consequently all her releases deserve an article. Carliertwo (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is notability inherited? That goes against Wikipedia's own guidelines. Lachlan Foley (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Generation Terrorists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rough Trade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Easily remedied - have added references if that's what you were after.Dan arndt (talk) 07:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And have you looked at this thread about your disruptive editing? If you don't think something is notable, take it to AfD. Although all your AfDs will be easily kept. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP with your disruptive edits. If you don't think an article is notable, then take it to AfD. You are close to being blocked. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lachlan Foley. You have new messages at Sam Sailor's talk page.
Message added 10:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Sam User talk:Sam Sailor 10:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would be useful if you accepted other users suggestions, you changed the sections on the page, and you said that you were open for suggestions, guess not. User:Rhanas ^Sing! 23:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user in question is persistently reverting productive changes I am making to Manic Street Preachers articles without explanation. That is not my fault. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If anything he single improved a lot of the Manic Street Preachers pages, like other pages, you are the one persistently removing his information to, if he removes your information, he explains why, like he did on the Everything Must Go page, but you kept removing his information, and you were the one that did not explain NOTHING, and reported him. On the page in question, I don't see how this change is not productive. He sees what is best for the page, you make this a stupid fight. So don't say "its not my fault". User:Rhanas ^Sing! 23:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As, despite the discussion at WP:ANI, you are still edit-warring over notability tags, some of which are for singles that clearly pass WP:MUSIC, I have started a topic ban discussion there. I would strongly advise that you do not continue to add notability tags to music articles unless they are clearly non-notable (in which case they should be PRODded or AFDd anyway). Black Kite (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then what is the point of having the tag in the first place? I am only following Notability (music). Lachlan Foley (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except you're not. You have, for example, tagged multiple singles that have appeared (sometimes quite highly) in national music charts. Also, if you're tagging such articles as non-notable, you are effectively saying they should be deleted, so should be following WP:BEFORE and checking that they aren't notable. For some you've tagged, a simple Google search would reveal multiple secondary sources discussing them. Even if you don't add those sources, that should tell you that the tag is not appropriate, and an {{Unreferenced}} or {{Refimprove}} tag should be applied. Black Kite (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The music notability guideline states that one solitary chart placing, with no other chart placings or valid references to back it up, may not qualify a subject for Wikipedia notability. I have been using the {{notability}} tag to let other editors know that the article, in its current state, does not establish notability and that more references are needed. That's all I was doing. Is that violating a guideline? People keep saying "why don't you nominate the article for deletion, then?" – because I do not have to, that is a more complex process and the suggestion completely undermines the use and purpose of the {{notability}} tag. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm basically reading it the same way Lachlan Foley is. He's tagging them for improvement, not for deletion. Removing the tag isn't improvement.

Nevertheless, I would suggest holding off on further tagging until this is resolved. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The notability tag is not an improvement tag. It says "I think this is not notable and should be deleted, what does everyone else think?". You are never, ever, going to get a single that has charted highly in, say, the UK Top 100 deleted. Because it will have sources. You are almost certainly also never going to get a single (even if it charted at #99) by a major, well-written about band, deleted. Because sources will exist. As I said above, there are two far better tags to place on such pages. If you are sure an article is non-notable, then nominate it for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 19:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have seen this user add the notability tag on articles for singles that have charted in the top 30 in the UK, and for which a reference has been provided. A notability tag implies the article should be considered for deletion; it does not indicate that the article is worthy but needs some improvement.Nqr9 (talk) 04:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It my understanding that you keep tagging these articles for no reason, This Is My Truth Tell Me Yours, Know Your Enemy and Lifeblood just to name a few, and after the removal of this tags, you went further and tagged Futurology and Gold Against the Soul, which have been improved and the tags have been removed. Also you keep editing for no reason, changing the sections out of nowhere and even deleting information, which have references, like in Gold Against the Soul article in the "Legacy" section, in the meanwhile I have re-added the information. You just keep making these stupid edits to start an edit-warring with User:Info4allthepeople (I saw your history with him) which is understanding seen that you got blocked (fairly) because of an edit warring with him on the Everything Must Go page. So your radical changes in these articles are meaningless and not necessary at all, have moderation. Also, keep your tagging in check, there is a discussion on you because of your extreme and useless tagging on every single article. It is pointless to talk to you, because you think you can do everything you want. Change your behaviour and your lack of intelligence on your edits. Rhanas (talk) 19:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you, you don't have a clue about what I'm doing. I am improving these articles and if you have a problem with that take your frustration somewhere else. Lachlan Foley (talk) 23:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Killing Joke (2003 album) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to a discussion on ANI the following editing restriction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely prohibited from adding notability tags (broadly construed) to articles.

You may appeal this restriction to the administrators' noticeboard at any time however I suggest you don't do so for at least six months. If you need clarification of the scope of the restriction you can ask at AN or on my talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hosannas from the Basements of Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Stooges (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My People Were Fair and Had Sky in Their Hair... But Now They're Content to Wear Stars on Their Brows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hare Krishna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I just got lucky with my Google-foo, but I found numerous in-depth reviews of the film, and shared just a few at the AFD. I believe WP:NF is easily met. I invite your response. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment at the AFD and your edit to the article. Good job! You might consider doing a <s>strike-through</s> or your nomination statement and perhaps add the emboldened word "Withdrawn". Or we can simply wait 7 days. . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also found many reviews listed over at Rotten Tomatoes and have begun improving the article. Thanks again, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Fun House (The Stooges album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 05:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand why you are removing sourced genres from album articles, most recently from the Morrissey-related ones. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the step of initiating a move request from Bob Evans (musician) back to Kevin Mitchell (musician) - details of the discussion can be found at the article's talkpage. Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slash 'n' Burn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read this Wp:Citing sources#Webpages: Citations for World Wide Web pages typically include:

URL of the webpage:

name of the author(s)

title of the article within quotation marks

name of the website

date of publication

page number(s) (if applicable)

the date you retrieved (or accessed) the webpage (required if the publication date is unknown)

So, your "three proposals" here don't follow our guideline as you constantly repeat the name of the website twice.

1)..."Siouxsie & the Banshees | Artist | Official Charts". officialcharts.com. ...

2)..."Ju Ju – Siouxsie and the Banshees : Songs, Reviews, Credits, Awards : AllMusic". AllMusic. ...

3)..."Artists Beginning with S | Music | guardian.co.uk". guardian.co.uk. ...

According to the citation style, here is how these 3 sources have to be presented:

1)... "Siouxsie & the Banshees". officialcharts.com. ...

2)... 'Ju Ju – Siouxsie and the Banshees review". AllMusic. AllRovi. ...

3)... "Artists Beginning with S". guardian.co.uk. ...

Finally, as a decision has to be made concerning the style and the presentation of a source, here is another wiki guideline:

Per wp:CITEVAR

if you are the first contributor to add citations to an article, you may choose whichever style you think best for the article",

It is the case here, I don't want to see the name of a publication like "Allmusic" repeated twice in the source. So, I choose the citation style in green. Carliertwo (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a guideline at all, it is merely a list of what citations "typically include". Unless you can provide me with a link to where it explicitly states I exclude the name of the website from the article header (as it appears on the top of one's internet browser tab) I see no reason to omit this information. Lachlan Foley (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And there isn't any guideline that invite you to include everything appearing in one's internet browser tab either, isn't it. Otherwise, you would have mentionned it in your reply. There are two different points of view here and per wp:CITEVAR, I am the one who is allowed to choose the presentation. I read several GAs about albums and so far, I haven't seen one with your way of presenting a title - bar your contributions. Read Template:Album ratings and the example given for Allmusic.

"Huey, Steve. Alice in Chains: Dirt > Review at AllMusic. Retrieved 31 January2010." It is not

"Huey, Steve. Alice in Chains: Dirt : Songs, Reviews, Credits, Awards : AllMusic. Allmusic. Retrieved 31 January 2010" like you would have written, repeating "Allmusic" twice in a row while also adding "songs, credits and awards" in the title whereas this is an url only leading to a review. As I said earlier, per wp:CITEVAR, the first contributor has got the right to choose. You now know my point of view. If you revert once again the citation style in a source on SATB related articles, you would receive a final warning and you might be wp:blocked for editing. No wp:Edit warring, please.

Concerning this time the external links. Regarding Discogs, a wp:consensus was reached by several users here to not include this site on articles. So please, don't add it again on SATB related articles.

Final point, per wp:Album article style guide # article body, it is said that one has to put "Critical reception" (and not just "rececption") in the title of a section.Carliertwo (talk) 20:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bauhaus (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pavement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at The Velvet Underground (album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crackle (album)

added a link pointing to Peter Murphy

The Singles 1981–1983

added a link pointing to Ziggy Stardust

Waltz 2 (XO)

added a link pointing to XO (album)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adrian Borland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Burgess. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Sister (Sonic Youth album) and Sonic Nurse, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 04:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star. Dan56 (talk) 04:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits adding an extra chronology chain. All albums and EPs should be placed in a single, chronological chain, while exceptions may be appropriate for complex discographies which may warrant an extra chain (Template:Infobox album#Chronology). Please get a consensus at the appropriate talk page (I would suggest Talk:Sonic Youth discography or Template talk:Infobox album) to support this change you're proposing for the numerous Sonic Youth album articles you edited. Their discography is not complex enough to warrant an extra chain. If you feel otherwise, establish a consensus first, since Template:Infobox album#Chronology only entertains the idea of an extra chain ("may be appropriate", "may warrant", etc.) Dan56 (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have removed Discogs from many external links sections in articles. External links are not held to the same criteria as reliable sources (WP:EL#What to link), so Discogs is still an acceptable link for these sections, hence the Discogs template still in existence. Dan56 (talk) 05:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daydream Nation. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you reverted my edit. I was just wondering why it isn't a compilation album? It seems to fit wikipedia's definition.

LenTheWhiteCat 09:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing which suggests that these tracks, the exact versions, have been released before, which I believe is what qualifies something as a compilation album. Lachlan Foley (talk) 10:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is a requirement of a compilation. For example Dark Was the Night or Sunrise. AS the article I linked to above states a compilation album is an album: featuring tracks from one or more performers, often culled from a variety of sources (such as studio albums, live albums, singles, demos and outtakes.) The tracks are usually collected according to a common characteristic, such as popularity, genre, source or subject matter. When the tracks are all essentially by the same recording artist, a compilation album is often referred to as a retrospective album.

The only reason I mention this is that very few albums use the other tag and it's very unusual for it to be needed. Can I change the album back? LenTheWhiteCat 13:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Eternal (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim O'Rourke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Outsiders (British band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Outsider (novel). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Marble Index (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Russell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lachlan ... you pushed a ton of deletion threads stating you could not approve notability. I suggest you try googling and viewing the first three pages for each time you wish to submit one. I spent minimal time on "basement jaxx", whom I've never heard of before, but was easily able to place 5 reviews from notable magazines in general public or the music industry - all claiming notability for the band basement jaxx. I do know who chemical brothers are and they are very notable. Perhaps you should go back through you list trying to establish notability for each thread you made for April 21st (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2015_April_21) Also please read: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_nominate_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion & Template:Afd footer (multiple) to help bundle the entries on the deletion list when you are nominating related materials for the same reasons. --IamM1rv (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop You are removing {{Start date}} from {{Infobox Album}} and adding {{Track listing}} to articles that already have an established style and using misleading edit summaries. Why? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop You are removing {{Start date}} from {{Infobox Album}} and adding {{Track listing}} to articles that already have an established style and using misleading edit summaries. Why? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Funk All Y'all, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spinal Tap. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI Lachy!

Come and check these two LTA vandals I am currently battling:
Mr. Techno from Greece
The notoriously annoying Japanchester vandal (portmanteau of Japan & Manchester)

All this will provide future reference.

CHEERS!

JG

Malmsimp (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive871#User:Lachlan_Foley_indiscriminate_mass_article_tagging_and_WP:DISRUPT and User_talk:Lachlan_Foley#Community_editing_restriction_now_applies_to_you you were indefinitely prohibited from adding notability tags (broadly construed) to articles. Then stop violating such prohibition. Thanks, Cavarrone 18:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with your disruptive and WP:POINTY edits. You are close to WP:3RR and risk being blocked. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the WHOLE change, not just your pointy tag. You're obviously still bitter after all the AfD issues you've had with me in the past. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chortle. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD, you were bold, I reverted it, you need to discuss this. Or, you could find references yourself instead of lazy drive-by tagging. Again, I remind you of WP:3RR and WP:DE. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop and read WP:BRD. Your edits don't help to improve an encyclopedia, and the template instuctions themseleves discourage these tags on stub articles. Please engage in a discussion instead of edit warring. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The template instructions in question - "Some editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as stubs". So there you have it. Prehaps dispute resolution is your next step. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jolly Bar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Samba Magic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Lachlan Foley genre warring. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic's John Bush (the source you're using to cite "Play(('}}s musical style has been described as electronica and breakbeat") says in his review that after the first two songs on the album, "Moby redeems himself in a big way over the rest of the album with a spate of tracks that return him to the evocative, melancholy techno that's been a specialty since his early days ... Moby shows himself back in the groove after a long hiatus, balancing his sublime early sound with the breakbeat techno evolution of the '90s." Dan56 (talk) 02:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for disruptive editing. See WP:AN#Lachlan Foley genre warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   —SMALLJIM  08:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Samba Magic cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Story So Far cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LACHLAN, WELCOME BACK TO WIKIPEDIA! ENJOY!!!!

JG

Malmsimp (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S - Don't get into trouble with the other Wikipedia team, especially Dan56, who will revert your edits quickly.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Marquee Moon, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits continue to be disruptive and involving undiscussed changes to the genre parameter of the article's infobox, including a frivolous change to the flatlist format and reordering the genres listed at Marquee Moon with your latest edit. This is your final warning. Please stop genre warring. Dan56 (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See, Lachlan, Dan56 had warned you, I'm afraid. Better luck next time.

JG Malmsimp (talk) 21:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's happening is Dan56 is furthering an agenda against me by reverting my completely inconsequential edit and calling it "edit warring". He is the one who is being disruptive here, not me. Lachlan Foley (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not here to hurt you, OK? How can Dan warn you? JG Malmsimp (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrectly identifying edits as vandalism when they are not. You have been an editor long enough to know what is and is not vandalism. Please try to avoid this behavior, as it comes across as rude at the least and a personal attack at the worst, because an accusation of vandalism is by definition an accusation of bad-faith editing. —Darkwind (talk) 05:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also wrote my point of view there today, concerning your attitude. Carliertwo (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per wp:CITEVAR, as I've already said many times, I'm against your domestic edits that are coupled most of the time with wp:genre warring... This has to stop, these edits make people waste too much time. Carliertwo (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted to your version per WP:INFOBOXREF and left a message for User:Carliertwo. I feel he is in the wrong as he is reinstating genres without references. I did not go through all the edits but it seems he has done this through many articles, violating WP:POINT. This may require an ANI or other uninvolved editors (although I believe I would count as the latter). I'm counting on User:Carliertwo to not revert my edit and maybe this can be settled on the talk page. freshacconci talk to me 15:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I copy the message I let on User:Freshacconci's talk as I'm named by this user here.

My recent edits are not disruptive and in any way wp:GWAR. I spent hours of time yesterday and today to revert posts from user Lachnan Foley who was blocked for this issue a month ago, and despite of this, he keeps on changing genres in infobox. Read his case here. Then going back to "Dear Prudence" and Lachnan's interest for post punk bands, he had no right in anyway to erase the genre Post-punk of the infobox and add instead this sentence, check this edit here or on User:Dan56's contributions here. Can you cite me a guideline that allows him to put this sentence in every single wiki article about an album or song that he likes? Carliertwo (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given your recent disruptive editing and a consensus here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal:_Two-week_block I have blocked this account for 2 weeks.

It seems clear from the conversation at ANI that the community is growing weary of your behaviour and they may resort to longer or even indefinite blocks if this continues after this block. You have edited here for over 5 years and it would be a real shame if you exhausted the patience of the community over this issue. Chillum 17:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The duration of your block has been extended to two full weeks from the current date due to your apparent block evasion via IP address 203.52.130.149. Evading a block actively harms your reputation and makes the likelihood of future sanctions increase dramatically. Please stop. —Darkwind (talk) 07:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - you added a notability template to Music from the Penguin Cafe. What were you thinking? The band was never particularly popular, but they have a legacy, they existed, their music was widely used in films and the album itself was released on two different labels and remains in print. Wikipedia doesn't really need someone to go around and add templates to articles, what's your exit strategy here? 87.115.226.18 (talk) 22:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Baron Blood (film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cubbyhouse DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obscure Alternatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tin Drum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hammer Film Productions crew has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Smoke It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boys Better.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Every Day Should Be a Holiday.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Runaground single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop tagging articles for single/album releases with the notability tag, where these releases have charted (and references have been provided). If a release has charted on a national chart and this can be verified, it is notable.Nqr9 (talk) 04:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rabid Dogs DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Joyû-rei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1970s comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1980s comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1990s comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2000s comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Honcho December 1985 issue cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fly Life single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Din of Celestial Birds—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Paleface Jack (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa and the Devil DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hammer Film Productions films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Session 9 soundtrack cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Session 9#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frozen Scream DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Runaground single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that an article you created, Template:Eddie and the Hot Rods has not been added to any categories. According to the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, every article should be in at least one category. Please help by adding categories to the articles you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sounds Like DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Witch Trials.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vermillion Lies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermillion Lies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Crimes of the Black Cat VHS cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Liquid Liquid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Silver Apples has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]