Epstein Files Full PDF

This is MCE89's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 10.

Hello MCE89 - thank you for taking the time to review the earlier submission.

I wanted to note (without disputing the prior decision) that the draft has since been substantially rebuilt with new independent secondary sources, including institutional coverage by the Art Gallery of Ontario (2025), University of Toronto / Hart House (2023), and inclusion in the documentary Drop the Needle (2023). Self-published and primary material has been reduced or removed in line with AfC guidance.

No response needed - I appreciate your time and prior feedback. Gen (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MCE89,

Just a quick note to say thanks for getting me going on this. The page Philip E. Cryer looks good to me now, and I think everything is in place.

Appreciate the help,

RPK2000 (talk) 07:22, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could help, and thank you for creating the page! MCE89 (talk) 08:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Handfasted is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snugglebuns -- Snugglebuns (talk) 03:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Damned Whores and God's Police has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Handfasted has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Snugglebuns -- Snugglebuns (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I understand the concern: the draft must either satisfy one of the academic-specific notability criteria (WP:PROF) or demonstrate notability through multiple reliable, independent, secondary sources that cover the subject in depth (WP:GNG).

I will not resubmit again until the draft is rebuilt around sources that provide significant subject-focused coverage (i.e., profiles/features where Paulo Gonçalves is the primary topic, not passing mentions in coverage of USI initiatives). I will also remove CV-like content and keep only material directly supported by independent secondary sources.

Because this is a COI/autobiographical topic, I will prepare changes in my sandbox and use edit requests for independent editors to implement them. If reviewers can indicate what kinds of sources would best demonstrate “significant coverage” in this case (e.g., profiles vs. program announcements), I would appreciate the guidance. Thank you. Prof Paulo Goncalves (talk) 13:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colleen McCullough is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article William Grant Broughton is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 00:04, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article William Grant Broughton has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article William Grant Broughton has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colleen McCullough has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fanny Cochrane Smith is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actuall7 -- Actuall7 (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Real Matilda is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 17:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fanny Cochrane Smith has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actuall7 -- Actuall7 (talk) 05:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Real Matilda has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Charles Strong is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Warriorglance -- Warriorglance (talk) 14:32, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Charles Strong has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Warriorglance -- Warriorglance (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colleen McCullough, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Colleen McCullough described the television adaptation of her best-known novel as "instant vomit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colleen McCullough. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Colleen McCullough), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

On 26 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fanny Cochrane Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that recordings of the voice of Fanny Cochrane Smith (pictured) were used in the development of a modern Aboriginal Tasmanian constructed language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fanny Cochrane Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fanny Cochrane Smith), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today especially for Mary Fortune, "about a 19th-century Australian writer who was probably the first woman to write detective fiction. She wrote pseudonymously throughout her career—likely in part due to her scandalous past—with her identity only rediscovered several decades after her death. The details of her life have only recently been unearthed by Lucy Sussex, whose research I have relied on heavily in writing this article."! - Thank you for an amazing flow of high quality content seen on this page alone! - Enjoy your first TFA day! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

women in Australian literature

Thank you for quality articles around women in Australian literature such as Mary Fortune and The Hand That Signed the Paper, for aboriginal women such as Truganini and Fanny Cochrane Smith, for quality ambitions for several articles, for defining your user by articles, from the start, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 3019 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this is so lovely! MCE89 (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I still remember it being a normal day in mid-October when I came across this article about a detective writer who was neither Doyle nor Christie.

I did see your nomination for Truganini, which I might review if I have time, as I’m presently in the middle of school examinations. Anyways, I hope you are having a great day and good luck going forward. MSincccc (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @MSincccc, and thanks so much again for the review! Good luck with your exams and have a great day too :) MCE89 (talk) 03:09, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Among many articles, I appreciate your detailed and thorough explanation in this piece. I am grateful you took the time to review papers, including those in Japanese. Doc James edited the article afterward. Since I'm not confident in my English, I'd like to consider how to proceed with future edits. For now, I just wanted to express my thanks.~~~~ 流山隆一 (talk) 11:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Of course @流山隆一, and thanks again for your work on the article! In future I'd really suggest staying away from LLMs — it's totally okay if your English isn't perfect, but using LLMs tends to just create more trouble than they're worth. MCE89 (talk) 03:11, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Rosa Campbell Praed is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Wild Australia Show is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Rosa Campbell Praed has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Ada Cambridge is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Theresa Vidal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mary Theresa Vidal began her writing career with a collection of Christian moral tales intended to educate convicts and servants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Theresa Vidal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Theresa Vidal), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Rosa Campbell Praed has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Wild Australia Show has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am interested in translating the article about Imelda Harsono from the Indonesian Wikipedia into English. However, I noticed that this topic had previously been submitted through Articles for Creation and was declined on the grounds that the sources did not demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. In the most recent revision of the draft, I have added several references that help demonstrate the subject’s notability and independence of coverage.

For example, Jawa Pos in online edition (2025), published a substantial article discussing the subject. The piece is not an advertorial or press release but part of a regular editorial feature that profiles the work and ideas of notable individuals. Another comprehensive profile appeared in Prestige Indonesia, a well-known lifestyle magazine. The article was published in 2016 and is accessible online via PressReader: https://www.pressreader.com/indonesia/prestige-indonesia/20160301/282999693934449

Earlier independent coverage also appears in SWA (magazine), a leading Indonesian business magazine. Two examples include: https://swa.co.id/read/81535/imelda-m-harsono-kiat-sukses-menjadi-women-leader and https://swa.co.id/read/91540/terobosan-imelda-m-harsono-di-samator-group .Both of these are journalistic interviews and editorial features rather than press releases.

Please note that searching for sources may sometimes be technically difficult because the subject’s name is occasionally written in different forms, such as Imelda Mulyani Harsono or Imelda M. Harsono.

In addition to the sources mentioned above, other independent outlets, such as Tatler Asia and Hukumonline, also contain substantive discussions of the subject. Taken together, these sources suggest that coverage of the subject has appeared consistently over a period of years rather than as isolated mentions. Coverage also appears in the context of the well-documented Harsono family in business literature, including this book: https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Kasus_Kasus_Manajemen_Perusahaan_Indones/PXd8EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Imelda+Harsono%22&pg=PA232&printsec=frontcover

I have added these sources to the existing draft (even though I am not the original creator), since the maintenance template indicates that improvements should be made directly in the draft. I hope the steps I have taken are consistent with Wikipedia’s guidelines and help clarify the availability of independent, reliable coverage of the subject. Rahmatdenas (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rahmatdenas! Those sources are definitely an improvement, but I still don't see multiple sources that are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of the subject. The Jawa Pos sources is probably the best, but note that interviews are not considered independent sources — we need multiple sources where someone entirely unconnected to Harsono covers her in detail. I can see that you've resubmitted the draft for review though, so another reviewer will take a look at it and might come to a different conclusion. Good luck with the draft! MCE89 (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]