Epstein Files Full PDF

• Archives1 3 June 2006 to 06 November 2006
• Archives2 7 November 2006 to 29 August 2021
• Archives3 30 August 2021 to 2 December 2025

Hi there. I see you have dealt with this editor. Wondering is you have anything to add to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reema.1971. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Magnolia677, User:Abujahangir and User:Abuhasanjahangir are the same person and I had suggested to him that he make note of it on his user page — which he did. I did not know User:Reemi.1971 was also included. Abujahangir had said there were only the 2 accounts when another editor had questioned him. He made no reference to Reemi.1971. Masterhatch (talk) 14:58, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one made my head spin. I'm sure their last edit at Port Alberni was AI. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 15:02, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He does use AI for most of his edits -- for both replying on talk and editting articles. Masterhatch (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Promotional account. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:32, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i saw your userpage and im christian too, but a lutheran. @Masterhatch Yooniik (talk) 17:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yooniiik has given you a puppy!

Puppies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your puppy must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a puppy, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of puppies by adding {{subst:Puppy}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you masterhatch!You welcomed me to wikipedia and I am so grateful to you! In Christ, Yooniiik Yooniik (talk) 17:56, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Masterhatch:

Hi! How is it going? Question 4 ya: have you ever talked to OrdinaryOtter? They are so nice! Yooniik (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name doesn't ring a bell. Masterhatch (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay wasnt trying to be snoopy Yooniik (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Masterhatch, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 07:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 07:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Masterhatch, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Yooniik (talk) 19:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Hello, Masterhatch! Merry Christmas! Yooniik (talk) 19:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There were about 20 other pages where I did similar reverts. The discussion on the MOS Talk page is interesting. Best wishes for the New Year! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was following the conversation there. Felt no need to chime in as the rest of the gang was doing a good job at that. Masterhatch (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Masterhatch. You have new messages at WT:AFD.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~2026-31669-3 (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Masterhatch, I was hoping that you could provide some feedback as an external party.

Recently I made an edit on the Sukarno article that contextualized 30 September Movement. The topic is contentious and tends to bring out emotions (see: Talk:30 September Movement) because it led to the mass murder of what many believe to be in excess of 1,000,000 civilians and it is part of the lived experience of many Indonesians and my edit was reverted by an anonymous user.

While there are competing theories, my view is that CIA documents declassified by FOIA requests as well as statements from PKI party officials have created a weak consensus on involvement of PKI leadership in the coup attempt. My goal is not to to litigate this on Wikipedia or to instigate a revert war, but I think that aligning with external consensus and having consistency across articles is a good thing.

What do you think is the best way to navigate this? Ostip (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ostip, I see there is no discussion at Talk:Sukarno regarding the edit in question. I suggest you get a discussion going there and see what others think. Remember, the onus is on you to gain consensus to reinstate that edit. Not sure what I can say beyond that at this point. Masterhatch (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. Ostip (talk) 14:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

06:59, 10 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-90080-3 (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Helo I am inquiring about Draft:NGO Funding Act (Uganda) to be reviewed ~2026-90080-3 (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't review drafts. Be patient. Someone will be along to review it. Masterhatch (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Hey, why do you keep reverting talk pages without talking about the changes you’re making and stop vandalizing my changes.

Please see wikipedias manual of style.

User:Techgod, specifically which part of the MOS are you talking about? I merely cleaned up the mess you made, as explained on your talk page. Masterhatch (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well let’s see,

it’s standard practice to contact the editor to have them explain the edits they have made before wholesale reversion.

it’s standard practice to assume all edits are done in good faith.

it’s standard practice to keep your colourful language about messes to yourself and act professional.

it must be difficult for new users such as yourself to get the hang of editing. Please review the manual of style and current best practices before making any edits to anything I’ve written. Techgod (talk) 22:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have seen several of the responses you have made to attempted edits and suggestions I made regarding historiographical terminology on the pages of historic states. I would like to bring up inconsistency across these articles. Some such as the articles on the Sassanian Empire and Ilkhanate do use the historical terms in the infobox rather than the commonly used historiographical terms. I believe it should be consistent, either all pages on historic states should only use the historiographical term, or if an historic state had an official name (the Seleucid Empire never had an official name and hence I believe that should stay), it should use that in the infobox.

This probably isn’t the best place to discuss this, can you direct me to somewhere where I can bring this up? Edidor123 (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edidor123, the best place to bring it up... Not sure about the "best" place. It was a good start at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greece/Byzantine world task force. I think at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style is a good place. LOTS of eyes will see it and if there is a better place, someone there will know for sure. I totally 100% agree there has to be consistency with naming. I looked at Sasanian Empire and Ilkhanate and I see your point. Some things seem to be inconsistent. Look at infobox country for formatting of names. Masterhatch (talk) 23:48, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]