Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

scalefusion.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

URL requested to be removed from blacklist: scalefusion.com

Greetings team

I recently attempted to add our name to the List of MDM Software Wikipedia page as a recognized MDM provider in the market. However, I later discovered that our edits were removed, and our organization's URL had been banned.

Upon further research and discussions with experienced Wikipedia contributors, I learned that, in the past, individuals from my organization repeatedly added our direct website link without adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Unfortunately, this led to the banning of our URL a few years ago. I now fully understand Wikipedia’s policies regarding external links, references, and appropriate citations.

I sincerely request the removal of the URL ban. I assure you that we will strictly follow Wikipedia's guidelines and will not engage in any inappropriate link additions. Our goal is only to contribute relevant and verifiable information to the Wikipedia community.

I appreciate your time and consideration and would be grateful for your support in resolving this matter. Please let me know if any additional steps are required from my side. Sakshi Singh Das (talk) 07:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GPTZero says this request is 100% written by an AI. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie,

I recently re-added the "Smart Home" section to the *Home Improvement* page, ensuring all information is now backed by reliable sources and proper citations, following Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I reviewed your previous feedback regarding verifiability and have made sure that each claim is supported with credible references. The references are formatted correctly and integrate into the existing structure of the article.

Please feel free to review the edits. If you have any further suggestions or notice anything that needs adjustment, I’d be happy to improve it further.

Thank you for your time and for maintaining Wikipedia’s standards! ElenitaElen (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Posting AI generated comments on people's talk pages is frightfully rude. Write in your own words or not at all. MrOllie (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Shivaji was Chhatrapati, this title is offered after coronation. Mumbai international airport is named after him as Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, therefore what you have reverted is mistake. Also in Death section, description about his son is not only out of context but very disputable and controversial. Its wrong to believe on anything merely because its written in english. this particular controversial part is taken from controversial book written by James Laine which had caused much of uproar in India. Further you may refer this link related to this part https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/maharashtra-cm-cyber-police-sambhaji-maharaj-wikipedia-9843272/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyot Jadhav (talk • contribs) 16:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to make duplicate comments on my user talk page. Direct any further discussion of the article to the article's associated talk page, which is where it belongs. - MrOllie (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finallly. Should have looked earlier. Doug Weller talk 18:46, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might have made a mistake in your review of my actions G4Wikis (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you definitely deleted a big chunk of an article for no apparent reason. Don't do that again.

You've also been adding commentary on the status of URLs directly into articles. You shouldn't do that either. MrOllie (talk) 22:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]