Epstein Files Full PDF

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

Hello, NorthernWinds. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Norm Architects".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:23, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the Arbitration Committee, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 06:45, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding NorthernWinds

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! The page in question this time was Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Technical edits should always have an edit summary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice, I will try to follow through.

Best, NorthernWinds (talk) 08:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zionism as settler colonialism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Nehemia de Lieme when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08 Thank you, I'll be more careful next time. NorthernWinds (talk) 07:23, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your tireless contributions related to the Holocaust and the Israelis and the Palestinians, especially those related to the Gaza war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! NorthernWinds (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthernWinds has stated in the Wikipedia discord that they

might have trouble editing in the next few days

(see https://discord.com/channels/221049808784326656/221060705078476801/1471042027369005088 for their original message) Kingsacrificer (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Putting this on your user-talk because it's a little off-topic but, prior to 2017, there really wasn't LLMs of the type we see today. And even from 2017-2020 they were mostly still experimental tools rather than consumer tools. So anything written in 2016 is almost certainly not written by an LLM. Simonm223 (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Simonm223 This is not what I meant, I responded there NorthernWinds (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]