Archives

Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4

May Peace be upon you...

Ref. the change regarding definition of Muslim reverted by you in Islamic Schools and Branches, I'll like to know the reference of your definition. As it is the matter of faith, so I'll like to hear earliest from your end. --M J Adil 16:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjadil (talk • contribs)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Rajshahi mosque bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Rajshahi mosque bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Itspublic (talk) 01:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please post citations along with the figures you have edited on the Wikipedia page Ahmadiyya by Country. Estimations are not considered proper citation. Please refrain from editing if you are unable to provide proper and accurate citations for your exaggerated claims. Wikipedia is meant to be a place where people can learn and understand the truth. If you constantly delete the truth and replace it with false information, the learning environment can become undisciplined. Please post accurate citations for your exaggerated claims. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolphin245 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read following links to discover that Ahmediyya is not a branch of Islam and hence they are not muslims. Moreover they are declared non muslims in the constitution of Pakistan. Do you you think that a whole country is fool to declare them as non muslims?

http://www.irshad.org/qadianism/differ.php

http://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/23296/why-do-sunni-muslims-say-that-ahmadis-are-not-muslims — Preceding unsigned comment added by A4speaker (talk • contribs) 09:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@A4speaker: Irshad.org is not a neutral source, as it is an anti-Ahmadi site, and stack exchange is not reliable as it takes the shape of a forum. Regards.--Peaceworld 09:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceworld111: I think constitution of some country will be written after much research and debate. Following is the link of constitution of Pakistan. www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1333523681_951.pdf

You can see page 155 , article 260 (3 a and b) . I am copying here In the Constitution and all enactments and other legal instruments, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context (a) “Muslim” means a person who believes in the unity and oneness of Almighty Allah, in the absolute and unqualified finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him), the last of the prophets, and does not believe in, or recognize as a prophet or religious reformer, any person who claimed or claims to be a prophet, in any sense of the word or of any description whatsoever, after Muhammad (peace be upon him); and (b) “non-Muslim” means a person who is not a Muslim and includes a person belonging to the Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist or Parsi community, a person of the Quadiani Group or the Lahori Group who call themselves ‘Ahmadis’ or by any other name or a Bahai, and a person belonging to any of the Scheduled Castes.

Do you need any other valid and neutral reference?

@A4speaker:Firstly, Pakistan's constitution is not a neutral source. Secondly, Wikipedia does not follow the policies of Pakistan. What Pakistani constitution says is solely the constitution of Pakistan. It has zero universal applications. Per MOS:Identity Ahmadis are Muslims anyway.--Peaceworld 10:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceworld111: What about Quran? Muslims follow it 100 % and a person who says even 0.01% is wrong, he is not Muslim. Now Quran says

"O people! Muhammad has no sons among ye men, but verily, he is the Apostle of God and the last in the line of Prophets. And God is Aware of everything.

Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things. (The Holy Quran, Al-Ahzab 33:40)

Ahmedis deny this and consider Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani as last messenger of God.

Their false Prophet said in his book.

"And Allah sent down upon me the bounty of the Holy Prophet and made it perfect; and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of the merciful Prophet, so that I became one with him. Thus, he who joins my group, joins the group of the companions (Sahaba) of my Leader, the best of messengers. It is not hidden from those who have the ability to think that this is what the words “Akhareen Menhom” (others of them) mean. The person who makes a difference between me and the Mustafa has neither seen me nor recognized me.“ Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohani Khazain, Vol. 16, P. 258 – 259

If you don't consider this as evidence that they are non muslims than I think you are also Ahmadi.

@A4speaker: Religious scriptures, when and if they pass judgement on groups of people, determine only a perspective of those people who follow it. If the Christian Bible says that all non-Christians are doomed to hell, would you really write the following in the article Muslim: "A Muslim...relates to a person who follows the religion of Islam and is doomed to hell"?--Peaceworld 20:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceworld111: If I start saying something against basic christian beliefs and start preaching my version of Christianity, what will Christians do to me? will that call me christian? Will they allow me to preach my new version of christianity? As per MOS:Identity, in case of any conflict, wikipedia will use the term that is used by community. Will that be applicable in above example I quoted? A very unrealistic MOS.

@A4speaker: Yes, many Christians will regard you as very un-Christian, but Wikipedia will not. A prime example is Mormonism. They are well regarded as non-Christian by large Christian groups, but Wikipedia has to call them a Christian movement. Next time could you sign your comments by using four tildes. Thanks.--Peaceworld 10:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceworld111: I disagree with this illogical policy of wikipedia. As whole world relies on it for information, it should redefine MOS: Identity. How we can make them change this policy? Who to reach?User:A4speaker

@A4speaker: take it to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Type in ~~~~ to sign your comments. --Peaceworld 10:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmadiyya in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on May 7 2016. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until May 7 2017, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. HazelAB (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peaceworld111. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@45.123.219.99: It may be the case that there are other editors that have violated Wikipedia policy by creating sock accounts, but you have done the same, and it doesn't mean it's ok for you to do so too. Sorry, I cannot help.--Peaceworld 18:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Japan Mosque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salam brother. I have an idea, but I thought I should tell you first before I implement that idea. After seeing this Mormon page, I think our Holy Quran translations page should also list the selected verses, because as far as I know there's some language such as Latvia, Magyar, etc. which doesn't have the complete Holy Quran. How do you think? Jazakallah. Mbee-wiki (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mbee-wiki: Walaikum Assalam. I think it's great idea, and should be listed in a separate section, much like the Mormon page you gave. --Peaceworld 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mta3 al arabiyah.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peaceworld111,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peaceworld111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peaceworld111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Jhelum attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Jhelum attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peaceworld111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Editing
	Just out of curiosity, not trying to be annoying, but why are ahmadis muslims? Please do not ignore my message as I have yet to understand both sides. The millenial (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://teknopedia.ac.id/w/index.php?title=Hakeem_Noor-ud-Din&action=history

Mirza Ghulam died in toilet and was found with full of his own faeces. Is toilet a sacred place in Ahamdya Mr kafir?--2.97.3.78 (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peaceworld111! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind taking a look in when you have a minute? There's some edit-warring going on, and I'm a little out of my depth on Ahmadiyya-related issues. PepperBeast (talk) 00:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Ahmadiyya, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ahmadiyya and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Ahmadiyya during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ahmadiyya portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baitus Samee Mosque (Houston) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baitus Samee Mosque (Houston) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Bait30  ^Talk? 19:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of famous Ahmadis of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#List of famous Ahmadis of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Akpaki Kinnin II has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Helen (let’s talk) 16:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ahmadiyya mosques in Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Islam focus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Egba Kotan II has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mta2 al taeni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect CAT:Ahmadiyya stubs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § CAT:Ahmadiyya stubs until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Gujranwala attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Gujranwala attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tuvaluan Ahmadis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. AusLondonder (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baitul Muqeet Mosque, Auckland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baitul Muqeet Mosque, Auckland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk) 03:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]