User talk:Robertwharvey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You missed the part of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, where it says "A talk page is research for the article, and the policies that apply to articles also apply to talk pages." The policy What Wikipedia is not makes it clear that advertising is not acceptable on Wikipedia. This policy takes precedence over the guideline that one should not edit others' talk page postings. --Srleffler 02:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "Perhaps had I seen the original "advertisement", I might feel differently about it. If it's a cut-and-paste from a corporate website, I might be inclined to delete it." Fortunately, you can see the original advertisement. Every page on Wikipedia has a button at the top marked "history". By clicking that, you can go back and see any previous version of the page. I'll save you the trouble of searching for it, though: this link will take you to the correct version of the page. The advertisement is clearly not "research for the article", nor does it appear to be attempting to debate content for the article. It's just an advertisement.--Srleffler 04:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Love bomb.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Love bomb album cover.jpg. The copy called Image:Love bomb album cover.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 02:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section at Linguistic relativity

Thank you for your edits at Linguistic relativity. The length and content of that page's lead section have been somewhat controversial in the past. Your comments are most welcome at Talk:Linguistic relativity#lead too long. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]