Sesamehoneytart does not mind criticism. Feel free to let him know if he did something wrong. He also thinks you should do the same to any user as long as you follow some guidelines: remain civil, assume good faith and don't bite.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Sesamehoneytart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 20:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WT:WikiProject Spiders#Articles on nomina dubia. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Microstigmatidae species

added a link pointing to Angka

List of Ochyroceratidae species

added a link pointing to Euso

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Uloboridae species, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kachin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spiders#Use of Specieslist template. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sesamehoneytart:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect C6H2(No2)3Ch. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 14#C6H2(No2)3Ch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Oops, grabbed the wrong one Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 01:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• PS: You should archive your talk page. Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 01:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to link to a category in a discussion, put a : just inside [[ e.g. [[:Category:Taxa named by Carl Linnaeus]] produces Category:Taxa named by Carl Linnaeus. Plantdrew (talk) 20:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I've learned it the hard way- WP:TEA got into Category: All uncatergorised pages "somehow"Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 01:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Actinology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDICT. There's not much evidence that this term has a great deal of notability past the dictionary definition. Google scholar turns up just a few hits, and none for which this is the primary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PianoDan (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some time ago you made a series of edits like this one, which didn't use {{Species list}} correctly – for example, the species names aren't in italics. Dennis the mennis recently tried to correct the results of such edits, but didn't get it quite right.

For the record, {{Species list}} is used with a list of pairs of parameters: a bare species name and an authority. It automatically italicizes the species name and puts the authority in small text. Thus:

{{Species list|Davus fasciatus|O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892}} →

• Davus fasciatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892

If you want to link the species name, then use {{Linked species list}}, again with pairs of bare species name plus authority. Thus:

{{Linked species list|Davus fasciatus|O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892}} →

• Davus fasciatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892

You can pipe the species name by using {{!}}. Thus:

{{Linked species list|Davus fasciatus{{!}}D. fasciatus|O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892}} →

• D. fasciatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1892

It should not be used in any other way. In particular, never put the authority part of the pair in small tags, because this will use double small, which violates accessibility guidelines. Also it doesn't work if you have a distribution following the authority, because this gets put in small font, which is wrong. In such cases, use a bulleted list via * as normal. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Twofold rotational symmetry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Twofold rotational symmetry until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Dipluridae species is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dipluridae species until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mediocre.marsupial (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]