Welcome!
Hello, Skywatcher68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers 19:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Skywatcher68,
- I had not written anything which was biased, second I am a volunteer and I am not doing this for money.
- for instance, Dr. Douglas has been awarded the title of “The Right Honorable” because he is a member of the Privy Council, which automatically confers the style for life. This aligns with Commonwealth practice, where Privy Counsellors and certain senior officials are entitled to the prefix. Reference to this is already in his Wiki page.
- Likewise, other texts which you removed do conform to the Wikipedia norms stated by you. I am not writing anything out of the way or something which is untruthful. Please explain why you think my changes can't be accepted.
- Thanks! ProTrump1 (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Krampus santa/sandas horned lion subject you 'reverted' for vague reasons.
https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/%C5%A0anta
It is difficult to "prove" through academia because this has apparently never been noticed, I am a scholar of syncretism, etymology and symbology and have connected these subjects with little doubt, this cannot be coincedential and at the very least needs to be looked at. As far as I am concerned it is settled. There is a root to Krampus to be found in this deity but one cannot simply take this from a text, one requires understanding the etymology and symbology of the matter which I added in the explanation.
Look at the coinage on that page. ~2025-38654-58 (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- As I said in my edit summary: "lead section is supposed to summarize the article body, which does not mention any of this." Please see MOS:LEAD for details, MOS:LEADCITE in particular: "The lead section must conform to verifiability, biographies of living persons, and other policies. The verifiability policy states that all quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports it."
- By the way, Šanta does not mention Krampus nor vice-versa; Wikipedia cannot reference itself, anyway. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi Skywatcher!
I really appreciate your time helping out with this . Your cool username "Skywatcher" says it all! Have a great day. B⠄Jayden (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- B.Jayden: Happy to be of service and thanks for the comment. I've been using "Skywatcher" or some permutation thereof across the 'Net for decades.
- May you have a good weekend, whenever your weekend is. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Awesome, you certainly have plenty of experience here, pleasure to meet you. B⠄Jayden (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Wishing you a positive outlook for the new year, 2026
Happy New Year!
- Thanks! Happy New Year to you as well. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy New Year, Skywatcher68!
| Happy New Year!
Skywatcher68, |
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Volten001 ☎ 19:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! Happy New Year to you as well. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)}
Rollback
Hi, I'm impressed by your counter-vandalism work. I went through the last 50 or so reports on a variety of noticeboards, and they all seem to have resulted in admin action, and you also have a good grasp of how things operate around here. Your talk page archives show endorsements of this work from other admins. Would you be interested in having rollback rights? Happy to grant if so. Left guide (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Left guide Sure! That would come in handy when dealing with the LTAs I've been watching, if I'm the first to come across their sock edits. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would certainly have made the same offer if I'd realised you didn't already have it. JBW (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Hello
Please write back. ~2026-96988-6 (talk) 04:33, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm curious what a temporary account with no edit history would want. Please bear in mind that I'm just another registered editor. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2026 (UTC)


