TERMS OF USE FOR THIS USER TALK PAGE Welcome to my user talk page! To help me notice and respond to your questions and/or suggestions quickly, please read the following carefully before posting your message. Always start a new topic unless you are replying to an existing topic; that will help keep the messages on this page organized neatly. (Click here to start a new topic.) Always sign your messages so that I can keep track of who wrote what and when. Replies to an existing thread should always be placed at the bottom of the thread; it is easier for me to follow a thread if the contents appear in chronological order. Please write your messages clearly in English. If I cannot read or understand your message, it will have to be deleted without a response. If you start a new thread on this page, I will respond at this page since it is easier to keep track of a discussion if it is kept at one place. Similarly, if I start a new thread at your user talk page, I will expect replies to be posted there. This page is not intended to be used as a general discussion forum or as a social networking site. Any threads that have absolutely nothing to do with Wikipedia-related activities or the improvement of Wikipedia articles may be removed without notice. Please try your best to remain civil as you post here. I know that it can be a frustrating experience to see any of your good-faith edits get reverted or deleted for whatever reason, but engaging in incivility will not help make a point. If you are so upset over any of my recent actions that you feel the need to engage in personal attacks, my best advice to you is to stop right now and take a short break from Wikipedia. The time off will help you feel better and will also help you avoid doing something stupid that could result in suspension or revocation of your editing privileges. Thank you for your attention and cooperation. Happy editing!

Since you seconded a prod for this article, you may be interested to see that it is now the subject of an AfD discussion, if you have not already done so. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting that! Was just looking in to getting someone to rollback on that. No idea why it was deleted like that, but I wasn't looking forward to doing 13 individual reverts! Elmer92413 (talk) 02:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the cincinnati entertainment museum + hall of fame is mine and not a copyright violation. I would like it back up so I can finish editing it. I just created it like 3 hours ago. let me know what I need to do to get it back up and running. hate to recreate it. thanks!!

Kn8d (talk) 01:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You reported a user, please check the AIV page, since the username is inappropriate, the user hasn't edited. It should be taken to the usernames for administrator attention page. ceranthor 17:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I wasn't totally sure at the time whether the report belonged in the AIV or the UAA page due to the nature of the username in question. Thanks for the tip. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How come my edit was reverted? Lisaokhan12 (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was undone because of the following issues

1. It clearly did not appear to be written from a neutral point of view.
2. It contained a vulgar phrase, which was unnecessary and made your contribution look unencyclopedic. Also, based on what I've seen while fighting against vandalism, a lot of the edits that contain profanities or vulgar language turn out to be vandalism edits.
3. The formatting that you used was unnecessary. In fact, when I reviewed your edit in the Firefox browser, the text that you formatted looked squished together due to the large size and was therefore somewhat hard to read.

I hope this helps. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one more thing -- your edit didn't really add any new useful information about the article's subject, nor did it make any corrections. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, If you wanna have a little more fun and be a little wacky, Urban Dictionary is really fun! - JC

Hi - some facts have changed here and I've withdrawn my nom. Can you take a look and see what you think. Thanks.  7  04:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in California-related themes, you may want to check out the California Portal.
If you are interested in contributing more to California related articles you may want to join WikiProject California (signup here).

--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• HB123469 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This user vandalized by creating an inappropriate page titled Purple zebras just one day after a level 4im warning was issued for a previous inappropriate page; please note that the Purple zebras article has already been speedily deleted, but details are still viewable at this edit filter log entry.. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has been inappropriately warned. 4im warnings are appropriate for severe vandalism and defamation only. A final warning to a user with a total of two edits? Beeblebrox (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SoCal. I removed this report to prevent clutter, but I'd prefer to let you know the comment the responding admin made. 4im is only for threatening or severe vandalism. Just wanted to let you know, thanks for being such a diligent vandal fighter. ceranthor 23:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thought I'd been here before. Keep up the good work. ceranthor 23:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 4im warning was actually posted by somebody else. But thanks for the useful tip anyway. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. SuperEagle, are you aware that the individual you'd reverted on Osmund Lewry is a retired professor of philosophy? What is your background in this field, if you don't mind me asking? Mine, for the record, is none, but I'd sleep easier knowing that Wikipedia is in good hands.24.22.141.252 (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't really have much of a background in philosophy. I simply happened to notice that the user account in question was a confirmed sockpuppet of someone who has been banned from editing Wikipedia, as you can see by viewing the sockpuppet's user page.
As Wikipedia's banning policy states, "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in defiance of a ban. By banning a user, the community has decided that their edits are prima facie unwanted and may be reverted without any further reason."
Basically, I was just enforcing the user's ban. However, if you believe that the article would be better with the banned user's edits reinstated, that's alright with me, but please note that you will be taking complete responsibility for any of the banned user's contributions that you choose to reinstate. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My position is that a Wikipedia ban should not be thoughtlessly applied against anyone whose scholarly work is respected in real life: this is a red flag that we - and who are we, after all - might be getting it wrong.24.22.141.252 (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Wperdue (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to delete this arcticle its existance cannot be proven...it is a slang term and there is no difference between the first time confuggler was used and bootylicious the only difference is bootylicious was invented by a multi millionair and confuggler is from a poor up and coming wordologist from the ghetto....but you know what bootylicious is now in the dictionary and im sure confuggler wont be because QNA is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quiteriot (talk • contribs) 01:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually read the Matrena balk article? Do you think that the woman is still alive? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 03:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I had assumed that the article in question was an autobiography because the page creator's username matched the article's title. I have struck out the invalid comment that I had left on the page creator's talk page. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I am puzzled as to why someone picks a user id matching the name of someone nearly three hundred years dead. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 03:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might find this interesting. NW (Talk) 14:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Posted a totally inappropriate response to final warning on user's talk page". Man, understatement of the year... :) Kuru ^talk 04:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 205.174.126.254. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation. GrooveDog FOREVER 04:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my page just got deleted. how would i go about making a new page for myself ? without getting deleted... like a musicians one... get back to me please

Ilurkah (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A great starting point is to take advantage of Wikipedia's new article wizard. As a new user, you should also take the time to read Wikipedia:Your first article.
By the way, here's some helpful information on how to properly inquire about the deletion of any of your page creations in the future. To inquire about why a particular page was removed, you should contact the administrator who deleted the page by leaving a message on his/her user talk page. Administrators do have the capability to undelete pages that were removed in error. Please note that the creation of a new page that serves no purpose other than to inquire about a particular page deletion will only create unnecessary work for administrators and is therefore considered disruptive.
I hope this helps. Happy editing! SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you reported an IP to ANI yesterday who had triggered the edit filters. When I click on the link you provided, I can see what the IP says is that editor's personal information. Shouldn't that be oversighted or removed? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In general, the oversighters should be notified about the presence of personal information so that it can be removed quickly. Unfortunately, the one time when I asked the oversighters to remove an entry from the edit filter log due to the nature of said entry's contents, I was told that it wasn't yet possible to oversight individual entries in that particular log. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, didn't know that. In that case, since the IP has been dealt with, would it be wise to take the link off of ANI, just to limit the dissemination of possibly sensitive information (not revdelete, just redact)? Thanks for clarifying. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link simply returns a list of all edit filter log entries pertaining to the IP in question; one can access the same list by clicking on a certain link near the top of the user's contribution history page. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, guess it doesn't matter. Happy holidays! Nikkimaria (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no i meant the correction and refixed your error —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.45.78 (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you did at the Christoph Waltz page is called vandalism. Please stop. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tag you left on What to eat on new years eve ({{db-test}}) was not a test, it could be classified as either {{db-spam}} or {{db-vandalism}}. Just thought you should know! :)  IShadowed  ✰  04:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I already changed the tag before I saw your message. But anyway, thanks for letting me know. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, looks like you beat me to making the correction by a few seconds; in that case, I stand corrected. I didn't receive an edit conflict message when I tried to fix the CSD tag myself, so I didn't even notice that you had fixed the tag until I saw your message. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC) (Revised at 18:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle, I saw you fixed a page on an Artist's I have worked on. You reverted some of the vandalism, but I think its still not right. It is Tullio DeSantis's page. Its seems they used a IP address also. Can I edit the page back to the way it was before? Thisandthem (talk) 04:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may go ahead and make any additional repairs that appear to be necessary. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 06:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've been going through edit filter requests for a massive cleanup and saw your outstanding request. I have left a comment there concerning its implementation. If you could please check it and respond if you have any additional comments, that would be great. Thanks. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 07:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the vandal revert here. Although come on, we all know that Disneyland is 300 000 000 000 000 000 acres. heh... Tiggerjay (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings sir! The use of third person to refer to oneself is hardly considered proper and reflects poorly on oneself, as demonstrated by you on your recent edit to my talk page. Please attempt to conduct yourself in a less rude manner in the future. Thanks! 06:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.164.255.110 (talk)

When I mentioned "User:SoCalSuperEagle" in one of the warning messages that I had placed on your talk page, that was intended as a reference to my userpage that you had recently vandalized. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy to you, I went ahead and modified the link to my userpage in that warning message so that it would read "my userpage" instead of "User:SoCalSuperEagle". --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 09:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro. 98.164.255.110 (talk) 15:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you... - Adolphus79 (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage. :) Timmeh 19:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm sorry I kept on putting this off. Yesterday, I had finished an online quiz in math, and went to wikipedia. User: Hatchetjones was already logged on. When I clicked on his contribs, wondering who in my class was a wikipedian, it said that he vandalised Talk:Crap at 10:24 local time, which was right when I was taking the quiz. Wen I was viewing his contribs, it said that he was not logged on. I want to know: how could this have happened and should I get an alternate account, and how. You can reply anywhere.

TIA,

Buggie111 (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused here. The contribution history page and talk page for the user in question don't have any built-in login status indicators. I checked the list of currently available gadgets and didn't see anything that would display the login status of another user. And I'm not aware of any user-defined scripts that would serve the exact same purpose. So unless the user in question used the same computer as yours, I have no idea how you were able to tell whether the user in question was logged in at a particular moment in time. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was in his contribs, otherwise he would not be alowed per school block

Buggie111 (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

His contribution history page, if that's what you're referring to, only lists the time and location of each edit that he made while logged in. It doesn't indicate when he actually logged in or logged out. And when I clicked on the diff link that corresponds to the only edit that he's made so far, I saw only the changes that he made to the page Talk:Crap, along with the timestamp for that edit. Anyway, I don't really see why you would need to register an alternate account due to an issue with someone else's account. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle, sorry for the very delayed response but I finally got down to doing some research on the target of your edit filter request. I left some comments there; if you could take a look at it and see if you agree, that would be great. Thanks --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 03:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he's supposedly distantly related to me: an 'uncle's brother's cousins nephew' sort of thing. HalfShadow 18:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources are available now; check my latest comment on the talk page. The admin who protected wants a new consensus, apart from the blatant opposes we have stated concerning the fact that there were no reliable sources.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the history of their Talk page, which they keep blanking. They've already been blocked today for other offenses. They don't really need a level 1 warning at this point.  :) Woogee (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was blocked today by Icairns for "spamming" here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:208.74.117.9

I was at work and I was listing references to defunct IHL hockey teams and their players. I run the largest hockeyfight video site on the internet and host thousands of historical video footage clips.

My registered wikipedia username is "igotregistered". I thought I was logged in, apparently I was not.

My question is why was I blocked and considered a spammer? I thought I was following the rules by listing only pertinent information in the correct specified area, ie. "External Links".

Thank you,

Ross —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.250.136 (talk) 23:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a relevant quote from the first warning message that was placed at the user talk page in question: "Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product." As you have stated above that you run the website in question, you are considered to be affiliated with said website. Furthermore, Wikipedia discourages links to external content that requires registration for viewing. You were given a series of warnings regarding the insertion of inappropriate links and you disregarded them; hence, the tempblock. I hope this answers your question. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to pop back and translate that German one for us? My German isn't that good and the online translator doesn't like it. SGGH ^ping! 11:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that another admin had already figured out the translation by the time I read your message. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== How was that vandalism ? The Chargers theme song sounds gay it's the truth ==. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddy300 (talk • contribs) 23:41, April 17, 2010 (PDT)

Please do not add unsourced negative commentary to articles. Also, the replacement of the team nickname with a disparaging version did not appear to be helpful and could have been viewed as an attack. And finally, the warning that you received also applies to the unhelpful edit that you had recently made at the page Fast food. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Messing up userpage HOOOOOOOOO!!!

Or not. HalfShadow 04:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I've only ever tagged one page for speedy deletion before (and that was an obvious cut-and-paste copyvio), I just want to make sure I tagged it properly. Was db-1 the right tag for How the internet works? The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 02:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To me, that particular article (which no longer exists) appeared to introduce blatant misinformation to Wikipedia; therefore, I would have given it the db-g3 tag. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just took a look at the article's entry in the deletion log, and it seems that the administrator who deleted the page agreed with the db-g1 tag. So I guess the page may have been just incomprehensible enough to justify the use of the db-g1 tag, but I still think the db-g3 tag would have been better in this case. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thanks. I've become mildly interested in vandal-fighting (doesn't involve much collaboration, which is good for me), so I'm trying to figure all of this out. The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i do so very much apologize for my lude behaviour regarding various articles, i shall forever be good mannered and willing in obeying wikipedias rules from so forth all the best x —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happymonk12 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created a page on Wikipedia called Bring Flashforward Back.

A day later it was deleted under "Speedy Deletion".

The page was fairly short as the fan campaign has only been around for a little over a month so efforts towards the show are limited as are information about the campaign.

The page was made to educate people on the fan campaign for the show Flashforward currently running called "Bring Flashforward Back" and the efforts being made to bring the show back for a second season.

Under section A3 it states that the reason for deletion is that the article only provides external links and no content for the reader.

The whole page is content educating the reader on the fan campaign.

There is no reason that the page should have been deleted.

Kris

--Krisp8888 (talk) 23:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not have the ability to access the contents of deleted pages because I am not an administrator. The administrator who deleted your page is listed in the applicable deletion log entries, which you can access by clicking here. He or she should be able to assist you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that an administrator has already provided an answer to your question at your talk page. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the revert on my userpage. -Reconsider! 09:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the revert on my talk page as well. There's enough info on my userpage that someone could reseach sex offender databases and see that I've never committed any crimes (haven't even been caught for my constant jaywalking), but I guess there totally couldn't be any other "Ian Thomson"s in the world. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that I'm losing interest, I just have been very busy lately due to unexpectedly heavy workload at work. I should be back to normal within a month or so. Thanks for helping make my time on Wikipedia much less stressful. —Soap— 23:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoCalSuperEagle. You have new messages at WP:RFPP.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 19:57, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle,

I was accused of disruptive editing by you after another user by the username of Grafen accused me of vandalising the Germany National Football Team Wikipedia page. However, I did not do such a thing. In fact, I haven't even ever visited that page in my life before. I hope this can be rectified soon. My IP address is 218.186.9.10.

Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.253 (talk) 09:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since an IP address could be shared by multiple people, if you weren't responsible for this series of disruptive editing attempts that originated from the IP address in question, don't worry about the warning. If you are concerned about receiving further irrelevant warning messages, I encourage you to register an account for yourself. You can access the signup form by clicking here. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noobtroll's block didn't work? Marcus Qwertyus 22:32, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, the original block failed, as it didn't register in the block log. But the good news is that the re-block succeeded. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Marcus Qwertyus 22:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mis-identified the author of the vandalism. Check again. 842U (talk) 11:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you read the revert summary correctly? Here's the diff of the unconstructive edit in question, and my revert summary appears to correctly indicate who made that unhelpful edit. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle; I am pleased you had an opportunity to review my posted article Managing America Beyond Jefferson and decided this did not fit the encylopedia standards of Wikipedia. I submitted the article to provide the community the opporunity to "think about the economic and social trends in America today". I am well know in historical circles of writing books theme "Historical Truth" 10 books correcting miss information about WWII, 3 three book series called "Managing America" and 1 book Reproting America History " the truth about how the American Revolution started. All my books are written from orginial sources that are in my personal library. I have the complete Journal of the Continental Congess 27 Vol., 4 Vol printed in 1830, of all of Jefferson's business letters and own 29 copyrights and 2 trademarks.

An encyclopdia is a reference work containing articles on various topics dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular specialty.

As I stated in the article the corruption of one's knowledge base is how ones thoughts controlled. I think your reconsideration is in order

(----) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchekel (talk • contribs) 19:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, to me, your recent submission at AFC clearly reads like an essay, as it looks more like an attempt to provide an answer to a particular question rather than an attempt to make an encyclopedic presentation of facts about a particular subject. The page doesn't have a proper encyclopedic lead section, there are tone issues, and several portions may not be in compliance with Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view policy. All material that is added to a Wikipedia article must be attributable to a reliable published source. Your submission does not contain any inline citations, so I have no idea exactly which source said what. Also, please note that per the policy regarding original research, material from multiple sources should not be combined to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources; such conclusions are considered original research, which is not permitted in Wikipedia articles. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged Little pichu! for deletion under A10. Ithought I'd notify you that the creator removed the template, but then significantly improved the article. It seems possible that it may be good enough for an article of its own, but if so, it would need to be moved to Pichu, which is currently a redirect. Brambleclawx 22:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on a second. There's a possibility that most (if not all) of the present contents of that page may have been cut-and-pasted from the revision history of Pichu. Furthermore, there may be notability issues. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about notability. I'm not familiar with notability of fictitious characters quite yet. As for copy-paste, it seems that way, so if the article is kept, it would require split templates on the talk I guess. Brambleclawx 22:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final revision of the Pichu page just before it was converted into a redirect due to lack of sufficient reception. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I went ahead and started the AfD discussion. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And the article in question has now been speedily deleted. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've already added reliable sources, which you assumed weren't and reverted my edits. They're all good sources, incl. the book by local & official SF historian Daniel Bacon, whose video version of the book you might've seen on PBS, and the one about Life in Chinaown, 1840-1950. Bacon created the "Barbary Coast Trail" of SF. The trail is marked with bronze plaques permamantly engraved in the concrete sidewalks along the BCT, and is one of the jewels of this great city. These are 2 wonderful books which I recommend you should read. I might be able to procure a free copy of the Bacon book for you if you're interested! Regards, MM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.115.155.107 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might be confusing me with someone else, as I haven't reverted any of your edits today. According to the revision history of San Francisco, Falcon8765 had undone the edit in question, as you can see here. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I appreciate it that you have put MLG under indefinite protection. I honestly still think the MLG article should be banished. Treyvo (talk) 17:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I didn't see that you put the article under indefinite protection when I put the article up for deletion.

Hello, SoCalSuperEagle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested.
Message added 12:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SoCal: what is a personal attack on you? and as for your templates, what is "defamation?" Defamation, for instance, is a legal conclusion that judges make in court. Not a wiki editor. And if you are simply taken aback by a comment, is that a "personal attack?"

Here is my comment based on the above, so as to remove "personal" from the point (and OMG risk being banned from editing a now biased good idea called Wiki): what gives any editor on this sight the right to flaunt their power the way that...well, i was going to say you but too personal...do? This whole "think twice before you upset the great editor" is a great peek behind the green curtain that is wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.203.30 (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know why you came to SoCal about this issue, since as far as I can see he isn't editing the article. Maybe I'm wrong, but in any case there's no way that an edit like this would ever be allowed on Wikipedia. Even the much cut-down version that you later added was reverted by a third party. —Soap— 13:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user has switched to plain vandalism now so I wouldn't take this too seriously.—Soap— 14:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}![reply]

Thank you for removing that racist comment off my userpage. I guess the editor got angry that I rolled back his vandalism.

Hi! No problems with CSD to PROD. My concern was that it may be subtle advertising for Sharper Edge Engines. As you rightly pointed out, "subtle advertising" ≠ the "unambiguous advertising or promotion" required for a G11. Thanks for correcting my mistake! --Shirt58 (talk) 09:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you used WebCitation to list references for List of Pokémon. Would you mind getting me some similar citations for IPDL listings of 海賊戦隊ゴーカイジャー? I know the trademarks are up, but I don't have any way of using them as viable references.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know that they're 商標出願2010-059981 to 商標出願2010-060002, if that helps.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the WebCitation URLs for the first two trademark registration records in that range:

• http://www.webcitation.org/5ugEWVcdD (for 商願２０１０－５９９８１)
• http://www.webcitation.org/5ugEpUz9E (for 商願２０１０－５９９８２)

If you need more, just let me know. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this will take care of people believing the (Anglicized) name is confirmed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am not davidlevine photographer I am his unofficial biographer. his work is on many of your pages already some which are copyright infringements some linked to culture club from his brother steve levine's page. I was having problems addiing the source verifications required. Getting late do can i do it tomorrow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidlevine2 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may add the source citations tomorrow if you wish. By the way, you may want to consider changing your username since your current username could potentially give other users the impression that you are the subject of the article or are editing on his behalf. On that note, if you actually have a close connection with the subject of the article, then a conflict of interest may exist. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was tired and thought i was adding title to the entry I am Paul Tracy how do i change the username? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidlevine2 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To request a username change, please go to Wikipedia:Changing username. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just made some changes awaitng further ref info and images. Not sure if I have add the two ref correctly  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidlevine2 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

The refs don't seem to be appearing. If you need help, a how-to guide on the proper insertion of refs can be found in the page Wikipedia:Citing sources. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help - have a pleasant day/evening/night. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page and warning 109.246.224.179. My Internet connection died half way in the middle of anti-vandal efforts on the Noreena Hertz article, so I'm glad someone stepped up to sort it out so quickly! —Tom Morris (talk) 08:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful that you have directed me to the correct place. I couldn't find where to post it. --123.118.233.6 (talk) 08:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoCalSuperEagle, sorry I took down the AfD template, if I took it down... I'm new to Wikipedia and feel a little like an elephant in a chine shop. Still don't know how I get in that conversation about my AE page, hoping to figure it out asap. Also, don't know what the process for deleting pages looks like but I'm hoping I'll have a little time to clean it up (I've also asked colleagues in the AE network to look over it and make it less of an essay). Take care, Seththomasjordan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seththomasjordan (talk • contribs) 13:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoCalSuperEagle. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting the CSD tag on Jeffery kumi. I don't know why I clicked on G2 when I knew it was an attack page. Feel free to trout me, if you wish! Strikerforce (talk) 00:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you recently declined a submission of a new article I created. Your stated that the stand-alone article does not substantially expand the information contained in the parent article. Let me tell you that the section of the parent article from which I decided to create the new submission was also edited by me, and that I believed such information should not be included in the parent article but in a newly one, which indeed was created. I also planned to remove this information (fortunately I did not), provided the newly article was accepted. Furthermore, all airlines (defunct or not) has a stand-alone article including its destinations. I therefore do not see the reason why this particular airline should not have it. That said, I ask for a reconsideration of your revision.

Regards --Jetstreamer (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you had already posted the destination list at the Air Afrique article prior to making the AfC submission, what you wanted to do is technically called an article split. Since the only issue with your AfC submission was the duplication of material, and since consensus clearly does appear to support an article split in this case, you may go ahead and edit the Air Afrique destinations page by clicking here. Replace the redirect with the contents of your declined AfC submission (without the AfC template). For attribution reasons (and to avoid any further misunderstanding), use the phrase "split content from [[Air Afrique]]" as the edit summary for that particular edit. After completing this step, you may then edit the Air Afrique page and use the edit summary "split content to [[Air Afrique destinations]]" when you remove the destination list from the Air Afrique page.

For more information on properly performing article splits, you may wish to read Wikipedia:Splitting. Thank you for your contributions. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for you help. --Jetstreamer (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Come on dude Wet Scrotitus is a real and serious condition and should be taken seriously why did you take it down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwazwas (talk • contribs) 17:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments below your second message. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I got it but c'mon you had to have found it a little funny. Did you even read the article because if you had you would have realize the hastiness and the poor judgment of your decision.

Now if you must stop the flow of information about the extremely dangerous spreading of Wet Scrotitus, don't also block information about the deadliness of FUPA.

Qwazwas Swerty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwazwas (talk • contribs) 18:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is intended to be a serious encyclopedia; therefore, all articles must be factual and verifiable. Readers looking for accurate information will not find joke edits (including hoax article creations) amusing. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Along those lines...

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Syrthiss (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy April Fools Day. :) --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

;) Syrthiss (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for patrolling new pages. This is just to let you know that Louis semaan, a page that you tagged for for speedy deletion as A7 (non notable person) has been deleted by an administrator as G7 (blatant nonsense). There is currently a drive to improve the quality of of New Page Patroll - you can help! Please be absolutely sure to read the instructions for patrolling at WP:NPP, and the criteria for deletion at WP:CSD, and if you're not sure about anything, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hurrr durrr lets use IP addresses for identifying users in order to send them personal messages. EPIC FAIL, Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.223.87 (talk) 05:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SoCalSuperEagle. I am just letting you know that I deleted Kelly Scheer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo. Do you think you could get me some WebCitations for more IPDL entries? This time for 仮面ライダーフォーゼ, and also tack them onto the entry on Kamen Rider Series if you get the chance? The entries are 商標出願2011-027232 through 商標出願2011-027252. I'm on the road right now and I don't know when I'll be able to do it myself.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done 3 citations should be enough. Let me know if you need more. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, again. Now I just need to make sure an article isn't made until the show is officially announced.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could I bug you for a webcitation to cite this page for Mind Travel?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

er. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crokes13 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verification of the electromagnetically reciprocating engine is on paper at USPTO. Digitally blocked by Ao power. It is easy to find proof of electric cars circa 1900, What kind of motor did they have if rotating e- motors with armatures and brushes are attributed to Edison? You can verify that this motor is simple and extremely powerful only by describing it to someone who is educated in the field of electromagnetism. I have; the CEO of Ohio Magnetics; now it is your turn; this engine is a diaper big enuf to change the world that is why Aos have hidden it at USPTO and won't let you find it there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.98.101 (talk) 20:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was stating facts. I am not disruptfully editing.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibair2306 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you weren't making disruptive edits, then your account wouldn't have received an indefinite block. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep removing my edit?

This is the company I WORK for and what I am putting up there has been written by me and it is whats on our actual website.

Furthermore, we are NOT a subsidery of Film Roman. That needs to come down now.

And we DO NOT work on whatever Cal and Hat project that is.

What I tried to put keeps getting taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeytennutti (talk • contribs) 17:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The material that you tried to post appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://www.bentoboxent.com/aboutus. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to properly grant Wikipedia permission to copy the material in question. Also, it is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thank you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm just letting you know that the page Ouf monster which you had tagged as R2 has been deleted as blatant vandalism. Thanks.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello SoCalSuperEagle! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for fixing up my userpage [1] :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 05:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I can probably speak for many of my admin colleagues when I present you this in grateful recognition of all the work you do in combating particularly unpleasant people who don't seem to have any interest in "getting with the programme", and the mess they often leave behind. Keep up the good work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why was my comment removed????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidget8883 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I already mentioned at your talk page, your recent edit to the Renaissance article was unconstructive. Please don't add irrelevant junk to articles. Thank you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle,

Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See here [2] Standard2211 (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Reverting my heavily vandalized page. :) Thebirdlover (talk) 01:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that you reported someone using ARV, and thought I should ask where the heck it shows up? I am using Firefox and have the code set but see no difference. Calabe1992 19:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're using the Vector skin, the ARV tool's Report functionality can be accessed in the same dropdown menu where the Move and Purge options would normally be found. The Report option will appear only when you're at a user's talk page or contributions page. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, won't display there for me. I guess really and truly Twinkle will work, just curious. Calabe1992 20:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that ARV isn't currently installed in your vector.js file, so that might be the problem. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pokémon#Genesect Swifty*^talk 23:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:71.220.198.177 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [edit]November 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Thebirdlover, you may be blocked from editing. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

The above showed up as a "new message" today, and I am very confused for the following reasons:

1. 1: I have never even heard of User:Thebirdlover, let alone visited his page. And I certainly never made any edits to that page.
2. 2: The date, as you can see, is November 2011. Why would it be showing up now?
3. 3: I always log in under my user name to make edits as Hal Wing. I apologize for not checking my IP address before posting this and, perhaps, it is 71.220.198.177. But I suspect that there has been some sort of mix-up, based on the information I listed above. It concerns me because it makes me wonder if someone is hacking my account or User:Thebirdlover's account.

I am very intolerant of vandalism. As a school teacher, I even left requests several years ago that IP's from my school be permanently blocked from making edits, both because of my respect for Wikipedia and because I was appalled that students were acting maliciously and off-task. I am very much on your side in your efforts to keep Wikipedia's quality high as possible. I am sorry that there has been some apparent confusion here, but I can assure you that I have not been vandalizing anybody's pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.198.177 (talk) 00:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Hello there Haloreach1234 (talk) 09:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Hello there Haloreach1234 (talk) 09:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoCalSuperEagle; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reverts. INeverCry 21:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoCalSuperEagle. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Apparently, someone from my IP address made changes to a Pokemon page, and you removed the changes due to "advertising".

Well, first of all, I don't have a Wikipedia account, and second of all, I know *nothing* about Pokemon. You sure it came from this IP addy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.123.176 (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

csas Lrom23 (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you recently edited a page on yuba city California. Before hand i posted the founding year i was just ccurious if you are actually correct as it was well before 1849 when the town was founded. Sincerely wacko51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:2709:46B7:0:2B:F3CF:F101 (talk) 13:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The document at http://www.visityubasutter.com/pdf/historic_landmarks.pdf explicitly indicates that Yuba City was founded in 1849. In addition, the Yuba-Sutter Chamber of Commerce website has a page on the area's history that shows when the city was founded and named; the page can be found at http://www.yubasutterchamber.com/index.php/j-stuff/2012-10-10-06-11-26/area-history. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, nice find User: SoCalSuperEagle, that find has me ROTFEAB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.181.126 (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SuperEagle,

Can we get this moved to the user page please, we would like to work on it so that it meets wiki standards. Thank you. https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/Draft:Chuck_Dorfman HomeProPlus (talk) 05:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually better to keep the draft in the draft space rather than move it into your userspace if you intend to continue working on it. By the way, since your draft mentions that its subject is a member of your organization, I'm concerned that you may have a conflict of interest (COI). COI editing is strongly discouraged; for more information, please read Wikipedia's policy regarding COI editing. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 09:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Cbe1321 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Cbe1321/How to dispute court rulings, based on false statements (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Cbe1321 (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Helping friend (Plaintiff), Defendant, filed Motion, and it was granted by the Court. The Motion was granted based on false statements and fraudulent receipts being submitted. Plaintiff, was not notified to appear in Court to dispute Defendant's claims. Due to defendant's attorney submission of incorrect address info on Plaintiff. How to dispute or what kind of Motion to file in Court to stop court ruling?[reply]

I am not a legal expert, so I can't really answer that question at this time. Furthermore, if your recent draft creation was intended to be a how-to guide, then I should let you know that such guides are not appropriate for Wikipedia. This is because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of how-to guides. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Brent Sass, SoCalSuperEagle!

Wikipedia editor Shibbolethink just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment on Shibbolethink's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Rolling on the floor eating a bagel is a real thing, why are you denying its existence here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rolling_on_the_Floor_Eating_A_Bagel This is something people actually do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.181.126 (talk • contribs)

The rejection of your draft submission does not automatically imply a denial of the subject's existence. The main issue is whether the subject is truly a notable thing. If so, then you need to prove it by citing reliable sources that address the subject in detail. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 01:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F*CKING SON OF A BATCH MOTHER F*CKER. Rolling on th floor eating a bagel is real, and you're a denier!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.181.126 (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from including personal attacks in your comments; such attacks will not help resolve the issues with your draft. With that said, existence and notability are two different things. The mere existence of a particular subject by itself generally does not automatically make it notable as well. As I already mentioned in my previous comment, you need to cite reliable sources that cover the subject in detail. That is how the notability of the subject can be established. If sufficient notability can be established, then an article about the subject can be included in Wikipedia. Citing sources also helps readers verify the contents of an article. I hope this helps. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandbox to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Huritisho 19:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tales of Graces," This would have bbeen done by the previous user of this temporary IP address. Since the chances of him/her being allocated it again are slim they are not likely to see it. Incidentally I have a Philadephia Eagles beanie hat. 95.147.113.223 (talk) 13:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rowlet. Since you had some involvement with the Rowlet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —teb728 t c 21:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoCalSuperEagle,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoCalSuperEagle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]