User talk:Sssuuuzzzaaannn

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

User talk:Sssuuuzzzaaannn - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Sssuuuzzzaaannn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Kyok o

00:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Achalasia

When I recently updated achalasia I added references to all the content that I had updated. With your copyedit, the referencing is rather chaotic - the code for the Spiess reference is somewhere at the end of the article. Certain other sections that were previously cited now have no reference - surely that cannot have been your intention.

I also deliberately turned the bullet point section in "signs and symptoms" into prose, as demanded by the manual of style. Could you clarify why a bullet point list is needed?

You removed mention of Chagas disease from the "biopsy" subsection, and the Dor procedure from the "surgery" section. Why?

I will not revert your edit because I agree with most wording changes, but could you please address the points above? JFW | T@lk 17:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that we resolved these issues; I don't know where that discussion appears. Thanks for cleaning up the references. I have responded on the Achalasia talk page to your comment about references for complications. Sssuuuzzzaaannn (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More achalasia

Thanks for your continued attention to that article. Could I ask you to provide edit summaries when you make changes, so it is easier for other contributors to see what kind of modifications you have made. JFW | T@lk 09:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mottainai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mottainai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mottainai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Edcolins (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sssuuuzzzaaannn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sssuuuzzzaaannn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]