This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hello, I was just asking if you guys could remove the page on Strom Thurmond, and the page on Paul Thurmond, considering that Paul is my dad, and Strom is my grandfather. I feel that it contains private information on my family and is being used against me because of the "rape" thing on the talk page. This is personal business, and I would like it removed as soon as possible..I do not want any information or identification on my family on Wikipedia, considering it is family business. I would like this taken down as soon as possible. Also please understand that Strom was not racist in any way, and that is false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thadthurmond365 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators do not delete articles on request. If you believe that the articles do not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, you can propose them for deletion via the Articles for deletion process (I will save you the effort by pointing out that this would be a waste of time; both men are clearly notable enough for inclusion and a deletion discussion would be certain to conclude with a recommendation to keep the articles. I merely mention it so you are aware of the correct venue for requests like this). If the content in the articles is incorrect, you can request updates via the requested edit process; state your concerns on the articles' associated talkpages and advise as to the changes you would like to see made. Bear in mind that you will need to provide reliable sources for any such changes. As a family member, you should not edit either article directly; doing so would constitute a conflict of interest. Yunshui ^雲_水 15:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE your edit to Talk:Strom Thurmond. Again, do not attempt to get this article deleted. As user:Yunshui pointed out, it will not be deleted. Incorrect information can be corrected, but your not liking the article is not a valid reason for it to be deleted. Meters (talk) 19:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thadthurmond365! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

This user fights vandalism.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:128.92.79.194 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Block templates are generally reserved for administrators. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing? Adding an indef block notice to an IP's page (and one that has never been blocked at that), adding page protection notices to non-protected pages, creating an RFA on your talk page, etc? The RFA that you eventually created at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Thadthurmond365 is broken, and I strongly suggest that you rethink your attempt to gain adminship. There is zero chance of success. You do not have the necessary experience, and your edits to date suggest a complete lack of understanding of how to edit on Wikipedia.

Furthermore, you appear to be the same user as user:Thurmondt. Please explain your interest in that user and user:Helpertt Meters (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I understand you. But I do not know who Thurmondt is. Perhaps a mistake. I do not have any association with that user, and I have been reading about adminship over the past few days. I should have used sandbox to test that, I promise I will not do it again, and I do believe that I have what it takes because I have read and contributed to some articles over the years, not signed in. Thadthurmond365 (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Thadthurmond365[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thurmondt, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- LuK3 (Talk) 00:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you can falsely accuse me all you want, but just know that there is no evidence, and that I have no idea or relationship with that user. Please consider thinking about this before making an accusation. Thadthurmond365 (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Thadthurmond365[reply]