Epstein Files Full PDF

		The Music Barnstar
		Thanks for your numerous contributions to Australian music pages, which I keep coming across (even if I do misread your name as "Jesus" quite frequently)! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awwww thank you. 🙏. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 09:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tobyjamesaus. Just wanted to let you know that instead of using {{cite Ryan}} inside {{Certification Table Entry}}, you can use |source=book and |id=page# to get the same effect, like I did here. Enjoy editing! --Muhandes (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Toby, you've disregarded Muhandes telling you this like 10 times since. You're still doing it. You can just use source=book and id=(page number) in the certification entry template. You don't need to use certref= with a hard-coded citation. Also, while I'm here, please stop using semicolons to bold headings. Use bold markup with three apostrophes per WP:PSEUDOHEAD. Also, <br /> (note the space and slash) should not be changed to <br> per H:BR. MediaWiki software handles the space+slash better, and changes <br> to <br /> anyway, so there's no point in changing it. Ss112 08:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another shortcut you can use is for New Zealand certifications from the archived radioscope website. Simply use |source=archive instead of overriding the source with a long citation. --Muhandes (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Tobyjamesaus,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will have noticed that AC/DC discography is a FLC. In preparation for submitting the list, with co-nominator VAUGHAN J. (TALK), we discussed whether High Voltage (1976) should be put into a Compilation albums table. I referred to previous discussions at AC/DC's talk page archive. It was determined to leave the album in the discography list, which typically shows only Studio albums. Consequently it was left in the Studio albums table.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 08:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it back, since the international album is classified as a studio album, not a compilation album. It does 2 tracks have the Australian version of High Voltage and the T.N.T. album. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 08:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shaidar cuebiyar, I didn't realise this had already been discussed so intensely (a decade ago). It seems like it got quite personal too... not good. I really appreciate you linking me to that chat. thanks. For the record, I believe it's a compilation album (for the reasons I put in the talk on the AC/DC talk page archive). Maybe the topic will be revisited at some stage. who knows. Thanks Tobyjamesaus (talk) 06:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tobyjamesaus. You added a 5× Platinum certification for "I'm on Fire" in this edit. I am looking at the source, and I see a 5× Platinum certification, but it is supposedly for "Fire", not for "I'm on Fire". Did you have reason to believe ARIA staff made a clerical error or was this just a mistake? In Bruce Springsteen discography both songs have this certification, which is obviously wrong. Note that if we are unsure, ARIA staff are usually quite responsive and we can ask them. --Muhandes (talk) 10:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Muhandes, thanks for this, I assumed it was "I'm on Fire" based on the higher chart position and legacy of that song, but I agree, it's unlikely it's both. Perhaps clarifying from ARIA is the best way to go? Are you happy to do that? Tobyjamesaus (talk) 10:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I "fired" an email their way (ha ha). I'll let you know if ARIA answers. For the time being, I hope you don't mind if I stick to the sources and assume this is for "Fire", as written. Muhandes (talk) 13:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

) totally understandable. Thanks for letting me know - and let me know how you go :)

Tobyjamesaus (talk) 13:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just to let you know, ARIA returned to me after they re-checked it, and the certification is for "Fire". They even sent me a screenshot of the form filled by the label (Sony Music), showing the catalogue number and title. Happy editing! Muhandes (talk) 06:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Muhandes. Thank you SO MUCH for following that up and getting back to me. Really appreciate it. Re certifications - how good would it be if ARIA did a portal or something like BPI, where you can search for a title or artist ?!. Anywho, thanks again Tobyjamesaus (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding ARIA peaks. Regarding Celine Dion, her Imgur.com link includes only albums. Do you have a link for Dion's singles too? I would love to see it :) Max24 (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hi Max24, I do have all the singles as well. Most of them up to top 200 are on wiki already, but there are some lower ones as well. it's not on imgur (yet). Is there an email address or something I can it to instead?[reply]

I got it! Thank you so much! :) Max24 (talk) 13:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toby, please stop adding clear templates on discographies. You even restored it here, which is against WP:BRD after you added it the first time and I removed it. It adds a huge ugly white space at the top of articles for only desktop viewers. It has no application to mobile readers, which makes up over three-quarters of Wikipedia's readership, because infoboxes do not show on mobile, and quite obviously portrait mode on mobile doesn't allow tables to display side by side due to limited space. The studio album wikitable is also not even that wide on my desktop display that the infobox even interferes with it anyway. Regardless, as I said, BRD applies. Get consensus on the talk page to use it. It's already been removed. Thank you. Ss112 14:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tobyjamesaus. Regarding the ARIA certifications, could you please avoid doing this? Isn't it simpler to update the template and use the template itself? All you need to do is let me know and I'll update the URLs. Muhandes (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muhandes, thanks for you message. I 100% agree that (only) changing the certification year is way easier/quicker/nicer etc... but I have done it in the past and it hasn't gone to the correct file (eg it goes back to the home page of the ARIA accreditation's page), hence why I put in the individual dropbox page. I'm very happy to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobyjamesaus (talk • contribs) 06:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template does not automatically update the link, it needs manually updating. If I notice it, I will update the link. If not, let me know or ask for an update on Template talk:Cite certification. --Muhandes (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Muhandes, ARIA have released July certs now. Are you able to update it please? (or explain to me how to do it, and I will) :) Thank you Tobyjamesaus (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Muhandes (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Muhandes, ARIA have released December 2025 certs (finally) now, all combined as 2025. :) Happy days. Are you able to update when you get a moment? please and thank you Tobyjamesaus (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Muhandes (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toby. When you add extra Australian peaks or sources for these like here, please combine the citations. On some articles I've noticed you have just pasted the citations next to each other, in some cases with four citations each next to the other, which artificially stretch columns out. Please try combining the sources/text in the pre-existing chart citations with an introduction as to what the new information pertains to/displays, as I've just done on The Mavis's here. Thanks. Ss112 14:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for creating the PG Roxette article. I made Pop-Up Dynamo!, but never got around to making an article for the band. You do great work on this site. ;) Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wowsers. Where did you find the GoBs and Costello chart history? Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could tell you but... (ha ha Kidding). It's via a contact at ARIA. A colleague of mine gets data from artists periodically which I update. You're quick to notice, how did you find it so fast User:Doctorhawkes? Tobyjamesaus (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think all those pages are on my watchlist. Those sources are gold. Tell your contact thanks from me. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh :) Got it. I'm glad I could help out. I'll pass on your message. Thanks for the message. pS I've done quite a few artists like this - a few more to come, I might add some more to your watchlists soon :) Tobyjamesaus (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in articles like Backflips in a Restaurant, when an article has been placed in a category such as Category:2025 debut albums, there is no need to also put it in Category:2025 albums or Category:Debut albums since they are parent categories to the first. You did that here and have noticed you've done that in other articles in the past as well. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:The Bootleg Tapes (Caress Your Soul).png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:22, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the five pages where I had to correct your usage of {{Certification Table Entry}}. Muhandes (talk) 14:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it was coming up with the error talk - seeking the reference of chart - that's why I asked you if you knew how to fix it (before I went on and did others). I appreciate you telling me. Thank you :) Tobyjamesaus (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tobyjamesaus. I understand removing unsourced content, but here, removing a list of singles an artist has released with the reasoning that it is somehow "not notable" is something I disagree with you doing. Singles don't have to be "notable" to be listed on Wikipedia; they are an intangible part of an artist's discography. WP:Notability really only applies to whether those releases should have their own articles or not. I don't know how many articles you have done this on—I have noticed it on several Australian artists' articles that you may edit more than other editors—but you should really only remove this type of content if it's unsourced. Singles don't have to meet the threshold of "notability" to merit a mere mention in writing on an article. Skyversay (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hey Skyversay, thanks for the message. I understand and agree with what you're saying re (not) removing not-notable singles, in other words, I agree, listing singles IS notable - if referenced. So we're good there. I am personally in the favour of having a complete list also. The reason I remove lists of singles (or songs) sometimes, is because they're usually not references and/or in some cases, the list is incredibly out of date. Plus there's often the debate as to what's a "single" (another argument). As you've seen, I do update wiki as much as I can, but it's impossible to be over it all and if I see something that is so unreferenced/out of date, I think it's better (cleaner) to take them out. That's my opinion and why I do it. Does that make sense?Tobyjamesaus (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiesza discography, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Sinclair was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]