A tag has been placed on Current Value requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 10:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I might have time this weekend to help you with those pages. I added the issues tag to one of more of the pages to stop them from being deleted and give us some time to fix them.--ViSiiOn (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Skynet (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Supertouch (talk) 20:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Skynet (artist). Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Skynet (artist), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TylerDurdenn. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TylerDurdenn. You have new messages at Jubileeclipman's talk page.
Message added 21:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Airplaneman ✈ 21:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I removed your rude Reference Desk reply which had no content other than mocking the querent's poor English. Please don't do this in the future. Comet Tuttle (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which you've done again [1]. Please stop. Acroterion _(talk) 21:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Current Value, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current Value. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fæ (talk) 07:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I removed a line of nonsense/chat. This is a Reference Desk, not a chat room. Comet Tuttle (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice; it's clear you are young and enthusiastic, but Wikipedia does not work like other websites. In particular, politeness towards other editors is an essential if we are going to work together. Lolspeak has its occasional place, as do other bits of internet slang, but knowing when not to use them is an acquired skill, and if you won't acquire it, go you must. You're on your last chance here. Rodhullandemu 22:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)r[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not writing articles, or editing articles, or helping with images, or improving portals, or doing anything useful whatsoever, and being disruptive. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 22:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to modify this block. PhilKnight (talk) 22:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per my olive branch above, which came perhaps too late, I do see some useful edits in the contribs, along with too much nonsense. Perhaps Tyler would be prepared to accept mentoring as a condition of being unblocked, and a restriction on editing articles & related talk pages only, for a time. {{Second chance}} is also an option. Let's see what Tyler says in any unblock request. Rodhullandemu 22:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed this block to a checkuser block for operating single purpose attack accounts. --Deskana (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]