There is an edit note asking you not you conflate thes Chineses and Taiwanese figures as the sources do not do so. Please look through he talk page archives and add further discussion to the current talk page if you wish to change this in any way. Britmax (talk) 09:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page or the article talk page. Thank you. Vanguard10 (talk) 05:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Request for block review". Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 10:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you for letting me know. Vanguard10 (talk) 03:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for all of your help and feedback/commentary you provided on the FAC for Faces (Star Trek: Voyager). It was a pleasure to work with and discuss this with you. Hope you have a wonderful day.Aoba47 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Airbus A318 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Airbus A318 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Airbus A318 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanguard10 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

For the next three months, I will not be able to edit in a substantial fashion, such as improving an article to FA or GA standards. I will read Wikipedia often and occasionally add small edits, though. Vanguard10 (talk) 02:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the Las Vegas concert shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the Las Vegas concert shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vanguard10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! Much appreciated! :) - Mailer Diablo 12:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of TWA Hotel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Vanguard10, thanks for creating Sabina Puertolas!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please clean up the naked URLs. For more information please see WP:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AT DYK I left a note asking someone else to do the length check. If that passes (and I believe it will, or will be close enough to fix), I hope you can return to continue the process. Otherwise, please leave a note that someone else should take up the review. David notMD (talk) 12:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Progress being made. To run a copyright check, go to this: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ Once there, type the title of the article into Page title. What you will get for I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold is "Violation possible" Look for the highest percentages. Way over on the right, click on Compare. That will show you a side-by-side comparison of the possible source of content and the Wikipedia article, with duplicated text highlighted.

I believe the article is OK as written. the possibles are because of the long quotes in the article, which are indicated as quotes and attributed to the original sources. The top one - slideplayer - is something different. This is what is called a mirror site. It copied exactly what I composed at Wikipedia, over more than 20 separate edits, to create its content from the most recent version. So that is it copying me, not the reverse.

I am continuing to make small changes to the article because I intend to nominate it for Good Article status after the DYK appears. David notMD (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be returning to continue the DYK review? David notMD (talk) 19:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for completing the process. FYI - rather than the green check you added, for DYKs you are supposed to use the template from the DYK process, as it creates a green circle with a check inside. I replaced your green check with that. David notMD (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sabina Puertolas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! epicgenius (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article TWA Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Eero Saarinen-designed TWA Flight Center airport terminal was designated a landmark and is being redeveloped into the TWA Hotel at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/TWA Hotel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, TWA Hotel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you may be aware, there was a recent discussion on the talk page of WP:Airports which prematurely and without consensus resulted in mass changes to airport articles throughout Wikipedia. Before a drastic change like this is put into practice, it is important to have clear consensus, which from my readings as an observer, did not occur. Many of these changes started to occur before any real discussion had taken place, and despite much disagreement from some community members. Disagreement is good -- it's great actually -- without it nothing would ever get done. But it's important that everyone opinions are heard fairly and accurately, and that significant changes like merging the Regional Airline destinations with the Mainline destinations are not done without such consensus. I encourage you, as someone involved in WP:Airports and the original discussion, to voice your opinions and discuss with others about how we should move forward at this point. Positive and constructive conversation is the way to a consensus. I also ask that everyone (myself included) ceases merging or un-merging mainline/regional destinations until a censuses is reached. Please contribute to the conversation here. Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 00:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sabina Puertolas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sabina Puértolas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when soprano Lucy Crowe became ill, her replacement Sabina Puértolas had only three hours to rehearse before performing at the Royal Opera House in London? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sabina Puértolas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for February: Black women Mathematicians and statisticians Geofocus: Island women #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WestJet Encore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinook and Bombardier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me to review your dyk nomination. I haven't done a review and would need help. Not sure if it is time limited.Thought the article was superbly written and informative.Papamac (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of WestJet Encore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WestJet Encore, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that WestJet Encore, a Canadian airline which began flights in 2013, deactivates water lines in the lavatory sinks to prevent freezing on cold nights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WestJet Encore. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, WestJet Encore), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what your plans are at Talk:Virgin America/GA2. Are you trying to reassess it? You don't need to reassess just to edit it. I thought I would leave a message in case you missed the ping. AIRcorn (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting that discussion. I was worried the discussion we were having had stalled, and at risk of being archived without being resolved (someone programmed the bot to be very quick on the trigger, archiving threads less than a week after their last activity; fortunately, that's been fixed, but it seems we need more time than even that). Whatever comes of it, I'll abide by it. I did reply to you there, however, not so much to reply to you personally but so we can get the ball rolling and centralize the discussion, get all the opinions in one place. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test. Signature test. Vanguard10 04:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Bold marks removed. Vanguard10 04:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Default Vanguard10 (talk) 04:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC) 67 to 70 Vanguard10 04:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC) 570 to 867 Vanguard10 04:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)082867 to 00AC1D Vanguard10 04:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC) 072567 Vanguard10 04:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. SounderBruce 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know your concern. Do know that expression of concern can be interpreted as a false accusation or even a personal attack so expressions of concern have to be worded with utmost care. There was no canvassing. I did not ask anyone to make a comment on any talk page. I am actually very concerned about you. I thought that you might be a good person to work collaboratively but it appears that there is a risk of edit wars based on the large amount of discussion that has taken place just to use the word "adjacent" to describe a bus stop. Vanguard10 22:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SounderBruce 22:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am very disappointed at your behavior, SounderBruce. I would have expected better decorum from you because of your many edits. Because of your aggressive behavior, I do not plan to edit anymore on Wikipedia after finishing a DYK being prepared and fixing that article a little, concluding the noticeboard action that you started / finish working on just one paragraph (last paragraph about the bus stops) of the SeaTac/Airport station article in question. My other work on other prospective FAC articles is now suspended. It is possible that I might return in 4-6 months or edit a minimal amount but no commitment is being made.

If you, SounderBruce, are the face of Wikipedia and how an experienced user acts, or is what the administrative community encourages, it is not the Wikipedia that I know and dedicate my time for.

Vanguard10 19:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Patnagarh bombing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HaEr48 (talk) 23:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patnagarh bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a newlywed man was killed and his wife seriously injured in February after opening a parcel bomb that looked like a wedding gift? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patnagarh bombing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Patnagarh bombing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the article mentioned above has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 17, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 17, 2018.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

aviation in Canada

Thank you for quality articles around aviation in Canada, such as WestJet Encore, for Airbus 318, TWA Hotel and Sabina Puértolas, for your plans for Ford Focus Active, for welcoming new users and passing barnstars, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2027 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vanguard10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]