This talk page is archived. Threads older than 15 days may be archived, manually or automatically. To browse the archives, select the year and month of posts you want to view. 2022: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2023: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2024: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec 2025: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec

Vestrian24Bio is taking a short wikibreak to get ready for exams and will be back on Wikipedia once the exams are over on 9 December 2024 (30 December 2024 ). Most likely, however, Vestrian24Bio will not be able to keep away from Wikipedia for that long and will probably be making some small edits anyway.

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, talkpages in my userspace and alternate account redirect here. Centralized discussions User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2 User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Awards User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Awards/Service awards User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Awards/Barnstars User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Awards/Promoted content User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Awards/Recognized content User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Contributions User talk:Vestrian24Bio/common.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/common.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio/raterPrefs.json User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/raterPrefs.json User talk:Vestrian24Bio/redwarnConfig.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/redwarnConfig.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio/redwarnRules.json User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/redwarnRules.json User talk:Vestrian24Bio/twinkleoptions.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/twinkleoptions.js User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Sandbox User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Sandbox/ICC User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Sandbox/India User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/Sandbox User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/Sandbox/Music User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/Sandbox/Cinema User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Logs User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Draftify log User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Logs/CSD log User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Logs/PROD log User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Logs/XfD log User talk:Vestrian24Bio 2/Logs Redirects to User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navbox User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/styles.css User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/doc User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/doc2 User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/Main User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/Talk User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/Awards User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/Sandbox User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page Navigation/Logs User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Notice User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Notice/doc User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Notice/2024b User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Notice/2024c User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Notice/2025 User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User top User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/User Page top User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Userboxes User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Templates/Userboxes/Contributions

Hello Vestrian24Bio,

I know you are better editor than me as you have been editing on wikpedia scince very long time. But your move about Template:Twenty20 competitions is worng this time. The domestic cricket competitions templete are written in the way displayed in eg: Template:First-class cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions. So, don't take the things on ego. Anything better is good. This is not international cricket competions. It's domestic cricket competitions, And there is no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned as the are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions. Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined. So, I request to don't mess it.

Hope you get it. Wating for your reply. So, I can move the tempalte to Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions and make edit to the template or you move it and edit it likewise in Template:List A cricket domestic competitions.🙏 Csknp (talk) 07:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Csknp: Twenty20 cricket is more significant than List A or First-class cricket, thus it should be treated similar to Template:International cricket. Vestrian24Bio 08:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No it shouldn't, and you need to get consensus from cricket editors if you want to treat it differently. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: The T20 template has been like this, in cases of WP:CONSISTENT it's the List A and First-class templates that should be changed to include all notable competitions. But, I would agree we'd need a wider discussion before making any changes. Vestrian24Bio 09:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Twenty20 cricket is more significant but you should also consider we are not taking about International cricket, it's about domestic Twenty20 cricket. So, why to treate it like Template:International cricket if there has been a template follwed for domestic competitions like in Template:List A cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions So, in my opinion Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions should also be made in same way🙏 . Csknp (talk) 09:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say all cricket navboxes, (regardless of whether international or domestic) should be in the same way. Vestrian24Bio 09:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No it shouldn't, there is difference between international and domestic cricket. Both have different level. So, why to compare it. Rather doing things follwed previously for domestic cricket template. Csknp (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd disagree with that and also from your above comment,

• no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned - why? all related page links should be given in a navbox.
• the are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions - so...?
• Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined - why is that?

Also we should do this discussion in a template talk page rather than my user talk page and should get input from other editors as well. Vestrian24Bio 09:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined - Beacuse those touranments are only important and necessary for international competitions.
• They are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions and no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned - So, every defunt tournament mentioned will make the template longer and currently every ICC memebrs country have many Twenty20 competitions (including leagues) which has made the template longer already. And if any local t20 competitions is being held with out the respective country cricket board why should it be mentioned in template. If you are too concerd about defunct competitions and related page links should be given in a navbox. Then, make a template named Template:Defunct Twenty20 cricket competitions and place it there.

Csknp (talk) 10:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct teams should be kept, as it's a navigation box so it helps navigate between them. However, I have realised that not all of these T20 competitions are "domestic" as there are a number of "international" ones that have teams from multiple countries. This seems like it needs a wider discussion at WT:CRIC, though if international T20 tournaments are listed here, the name should not include domestic. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. That's why i had tried to edit Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions with only ICC memebrs domestic competition (including league) as per standard domestic template in Template:First-class cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions. But User:Vestrian24Bio has been undoing edits. In my opinion for defunct competition seprate template should be made otherwise there is no reason of it as defunct and "international competitions" ones that have teams from multiple countries all are meintioned in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions. Csknp (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Csknp, Domestic or Multi-national they are Twenty20 competitions. We should go for less templates with more links as opposed to more templates with less links as you are proposing. Also, there's nothing with a navbox being long, have you seen international cricket season navboxes... And even if we create separate navboxes as you're proposing they are most likely to end-up being merged together through TfD. Vestrian24Bio 12:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go and see Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions now. It must be ok now as there is both current and defunct Twenty20 competitions mentioned. Csknp (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should not do this until a consensus is reached, I will raise this at WT:CRIC. Vestrian24Bio 01:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket#Template:Twenty20 competitions. Vestrian24Bio 02:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
974		Bhopal (talk)	Add sources
137		Adolf Hitler in popular culture (talk)	Add sources
11		2022 Delhi Capitals season (talk)	Add sources
78		Namibia national cricket team (talk)	Add sources
786		Punjab Kings (talk)	Add sources
15		2022 Rajasthan Royals season (talk)	Add sources
23		Terraforming in popular culture (talk)	Cleanup
10		NRL Western Australia (talk)	Cleanup
2,406		Melbourne Cricket Ground (talk)	Cleanup
1,144		Ranji Trophy (talk)	Expand
1,903		CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder (talk)	Expand
2,293		Aam Aadmi Party (talk)	Expand
141		Uplift (science fiction) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
83		Galactic empire (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
82		Weapons in science fiction (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
359		Carotenoid (talk)	Merge
30		Polish–Swedish War (1621–1625) (talk)	Merge
38		Herman cake (talk)	Merge
72		Dubai Sports City (talk)	Wikify
49		Cobalt Core (talk)	Wikify
6		1957–58 Syracuse Nationals season (talk)	Wikify
162		Kingston (film) (talk)	Orphan
3		Aung Zaw Win (talk)	Orphan
2		Consolate Sipérius (talk)	Orphan
65		Indian cricket team in New Zealand in 2022–23 (talk)	Stub
4		2022 Scotland Tri-Nation Series (round 14) (talk)	Stub
26		Keba Jeremiah (talk)	Stub
29		Balasore railway station (talk)	Stub
3		2022 Papua New Guinea Tri-Nation Series (round 11) (talk)	Stub
6		Insurance Regulatory Authority (Kenya) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your review. This is a big article and I know it took a lot of work to review it properly. Much appreciated. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97: You're welcome! It's my pleasure to review the article. Always happy to help! Vestrian24Bio 09:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vestrian, it seems that you failed my GA nom of the Super Mario Bros. Movie, citing the top 50 authors list. While it’s important for nominators to have correspondent editing history, this scenario did not entirely warrant a closure, since my contributions were not minimal. Perhaps a reconsideration of the closure and a different view of the “drive-by” rule could ensure the article becomes of high quality to readers. Thank you.

PS: Thank you for picking up my GA nom of Pixels (2015 film); it’s been needing a review for a month. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 03:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: I'm a little busy today, I will look into it tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio 08:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia Top 25 Reports in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
533		Cricket in India (talk)	Add sources
112		National Institute of Technology, Rourkela (talk)	Add sources
151		Patty Spivot (talk)	Add sources
192		Canon EOS 5D (talk)	Add sources
60		Subhalekha Sudhakar filmography (talk)	Add sources
90		Communist Party of India (Marxist), West Bengal (talk)	Add sources
334		2023 SA20 (talk)	Cleanup
157		TV5 Network (talk)	Cleanup
126		Slotback (talk)	Cleanup
8,150		Nintendo Switch (talk)	Expand
62,933		YouTube (talk)	Expand
87		Joe West (Arrowverse) (talk)	Expand
54,466		Gladiator II (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
148		Osmanabad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
50		2017 Pakistan Super League (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5		Amniocentesis post-procedure care (talk)	Merge
27		Hedjaz Jordan Railway (talk)	Merge
8		Rose Quarter Transit Center (talk)	Merge
426		Srabanti Chatterjee (talk)	Wikify
52		Finger spin (talk)	Wikify
40		Electronic Games (talk)	Wikify
4		Serena Viti (talk)	Orphan
2		Coordination of Inclusivity Movements (talk)	Orphan
2		Budhiana (talk)	Orphan
6		Dudyan (talk)	Stub
2,254		Jaat (film) (talk)	Stub
7		Burundi–China relations (talk)	Stub
9		Cape Verde–China relations (talk)	Stub
11		Skynet 5D (talk)	Stub
1,640		Mythri Movie Makers (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For your efforts with the Arrowverse GAs Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant thanks! Vestrian24Bio 16:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed another user submitted the article "One of the Girls" for a good article nomination and it was failed by you as they did not contribute to the article. As the article's main contributor, I'd be happy to work with you to make the article GA. I've submitted it myself this time as a GA nominee, let me know if you'd be interested again! Flabshoe1 (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Flabshoe1: I've picked up the GAN, but I'm a little busy now. It might take take a day or three to go on with the review, hope you don't mind the delay. Vestrian24Bio 16:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, no worries about the delay! Flabshoe1 (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vestrian24Bio. I'm just posting to let you know that 2024 Men's T20 World Cup statistics – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008 thanks. Vestrian24Bio 10:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]