If anyone has any question, he is in the right place. --Vitaly N. (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I noticed your edit on the Ukrainians page. It is normal for sources to be preferred to be in English. Is there any way you could perhaps find an English language source that says the same thing?
Chaosdruid (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK! --Vitaly N. (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Onging discussions
Hi
I am a little saddended to see that no-one seems to be talking to you!
Anyway, I have added more and I have also moved our text to the top section, I had mistakenly put my notes there without realising it, so have moved them both and put a header for your suggestions. Please do not be upset, I just think it is important we keep the discussions apart from the suggested text. Of course if you think I should not have moved it you can move it back. Chaosdruid (talk) 13:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Vikings
Please confirm your acceptance of final solution or bring it to the end, thanks!--SeikoEn (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Украина
Чувачок, я же не удаляю свидомую этимологию, я просто дополняю информацию о её противоречии фактам, подкреплённую авторитетными источниками. Удаление авторитетных источников является в Википедии вандализмом. Прошу учесть на будущее. Пока по-доброму. Вот тебе пока хорошая научная работа для чтения на досуге [1]. --Voyevoda (talk) 19:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule on Ukrainians. Moreover, because of the aggressive nationalist battleground mentality you have displayed during this conflict, not least here in your posting on my own talkpage, I am informing you that under the rules of this decision by the Arbitration Committee, you may be placed under further restrictions, such as topic bans or general revert limitations, if you persist in disruptive behaviour. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)