Your nomination of Jeffrey Epstein has failed
Your good article nomination of the article Jeffrey Epstein has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 11:46, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
Hello, I'm Malcolmxl5. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Politics of the Soviet Union have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Miraheze (February 6)

- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miraheze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
February 2026

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 04:31, 7 February 2026 (UTC)- You came very close to a sitewide block. You are being extremely disruptive and wasting the community's time. Please focus on articles until you learn more about editing. Star Mississippi 04:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

WikiWorkerBees (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I request you to remove my block because I am not a sockpuppet for any other user. I possess only one account and I am acting in good faith. People believe I have similar accounts because they misunderstand my identity, but I have no ties to users who were previously banned from the site. I will adhere to all site regulations while I work to benefit the project. Thank you.
Decline reason:
My use of the CheckUser tool indicates it is
Likely you are abusing multiple accounts. I am going to modify your block so it is site-wide. PhilKnight (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WikiWorkerBees (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Reverts
Please stop reverting recent edits at random. Thank you. Staryu★ 09:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Template:Welcomer
Template:Welcomer has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HurricaneZetaC 15:23, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Unblock

WikiWorkerBees (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My assertion stands that I am not using a sockpuppet. I believe the "Likely" verdict exists as a technical error because two parties access the same network or IP range. I possess only this account and am willing to accept a one-account-only restriction and a topic ban from any areas associated with the suspected master. I want to contribute to Electronics and politics and more. with honest intentions. Please provide me one opportunity to demonstrate my abilities through my editing work. WikiWorkerBees (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, we're not going to argue with ChatGPT about whether you're a sock puppet or not. There is no question. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.
