Archives at User talk:Wizzy/Archive1 up to October 2005, User talk:Wizzy/Archive2 to March, 2006, User talk:Wizzy/Archive3 to Feb 2009.

Wizzy, I'd just like to call attention to this self promotion. How is this blog an ok source while others are not? Gugulethu You should be consistent with your criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredsacks (talk • contribs) 09:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But, for the record, I think it is a relevant entry - just like many of the edits I have made in general - and so should not be deleted. Jaredsacks (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Jimmy Wales started the article at Mzoli's, with little more than a visit to the place and a reference to a blog. What is useful about my blog entry is that I have directions to the place - could be handy, and it is clearly marked as a blog. My blog ref was deleted from Mzoli's long ago.

Re: the sockpuppet case, I believe Indigenousname's analysis, in that you are not a sock. But there is a puppetmaster about, I am sorry it got tagged with your name. The case stays though, until checkuser is finished. Wizzy…☎ 11:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know the article was started by Wales. I wasn't saying that your blog wasnt useful. Rather I was saying that there's nothing wrong with referring to blogs as long as its done in the right way. Thanks for the acknowledgement that I may in fact not be to sock puppet and I apologize for saying you are harassing me when i should have said 'bothering me'. Jaredsacks (talk) 14:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strength to you Wizzy for pursuing the case of sock-puppetry that is taking place on the abm and aec sites. It would be a pity if the puppet-master, Richard2704, and his progeny Bjorn Maritz, Sekwanele and Inkululeko get off the hook. This need not be the case. First, all these user"s" have been active recently enough for a check user. Second, a consideration of the historical work of these user"s" as well as many of the 41.24xx IP addresses clearly show a common single author with a common, singular set of interests. Surely wikipedia accepts this level of analysis as proof of sock-puppetry. As for Jaredsacks and his political fellow-editor Sekwanele, it is most likely that Jaredsacks knows Richard2704 in real life and I wonder whether he has reflected lately on the kind of person he has become associated with on wikipedia and beyond. 41.15.72.123 (talk) 20:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Preceding post by Indigenousname (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made a comment there, for now it is nearly impossible to work on that case (from a CU or non CU perspective) and it'll probably rot until archived because it is no longer relevant. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that you don't have good cause, I even started looking things up to see if a CheckUser was warranted. But the timespan involved and the huge number of accounts make it very hard to even start looking for a connexion. -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the sockpuppet investigation has gone cold. No sooner, and one of the sockpuppets, Bjorn Martiz, makes a tentative editing comeback. There'll be Sekwanele's to follow and before we know it "consensus" that abm has a million members and has seceded from South Africa. It notable how weak wikipedia's anti-fraud framework is and how clerical its Clerks. I am puzzled though, Wizzy, on what grounds Bjorn Martiz no longer carries the sockpuppet historical warning whereas Sekwanele still does. Indigenousname (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can see from the history when it was deleted. I don't have a problem with that. Wizzy…☎ 16:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your attempts to explain the problems with his version to Ambrose Chongo, but he continues to blind revert. I've tried posting warnings on his talk page, but this hasn't changed his behaviour at all. Do you have any suggestions? Edward321 (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I have been away for a while, and actually took AIMS off my watchlist. I know Ambrose, and I somewhat doubt he is willing to listen. Wizzy…☎ 20:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have my doubts as well, but thank you for continuing to attempt to reason with him. I wanted to give him another chance before reporting him. Edward321 (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just reverted his vandalism to your talk page ironically accusing you of COI and article ownership because you're not an alumni. I've also reported him. Edward321 (talk) 22:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wizzy, please accept my unreserved apology for suggesting that your revisions of the AIMS article were tantamount to vandalism. I realise in retrospect that my actions were out of a pique and I am mortified and deeply sorry about the entire incident. Ambrose.chongo (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mzoli Ngcawuzele, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mzoli Ngcawuzele. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Black Kite 10:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just saw your comment about not having come across mentorship before. You can read up a bit at WP:MENTOR if you run out of other things to do. ;) Igorberger was community banned a year ago and recently unblocked on various conditions, one being that I will be his mentor. So basically, I'm trying to keep him out of trouble and help him get some skill at collaboration and effective article-building. That's why we're having the Gaddafi discussion on a sub-page rather than the article talk, and it's why I'm kind of challenging him directly to do things. I have no idea whether I'm helping or not, but I'm trying my best! :)

And thanks much for your level-headed participation. I think it's been a good exercise in discussion and compromise. Franamax (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have to remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source - just because Nyerere was president for so long, it doesn't mean there weren't elections - Syria, Egypt and Iraq (under Saddam) all have presidential elections with only one candidate. The African Elections database is very good - and is backed up by Inter-Parliamentary Union which shows elections in 1970, 1975, 1985 etc. пﮟოьεԻ 57 20:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your links. I am convinced now. Wizzy…☎ 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note on categories. I was somewhat new to the idea of categories and will fix my mistakes. JMK (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no response... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.160.183 (talk) 23:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Couls you do something similar to the List of reservoirs and dams in South Africa than what a saw at the article on river?? Flagman (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the feedback. This has become a rather addictive hobby. I just pick a name, then trawl through web search results picking out relevant information and putting it into sequence. After a while, a thumbnail biography of sorts emerges. It is a bit like doing a jigsaw puzzle. The result is always incomplete and probably not very balanced, but I suppose it does no harm, maybe has some value. It is extraordinary that there is so little coverage of these important subjects. Thanks again. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index and the 'bot-generated article stats. There you can find tables generated by Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment templates on the Talk: pages of those articles. You should be able to (but I can't figure out how just now) list Important articles that are of poor quality. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Africa#Needing_work also has a good list. Wizzy…☎ 20:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those are interesting lists, but I am inclined to keep following my nose. I think all past and present governors, senators and ministers in Nigeria deserve some sort of article. My rough estimate is that about 900 have none, and many of the articles that do exist are very poor quality - either stubs or plagiarism from self-published content or very biased. At my speed, it would take over a year to just roughly sort out that lot - and then there would be the maintenance problem. Although, surprisingly. I am seeing very little vandalism so far.

I think sketches are useful, and don't always agree with the quality ratings which seem to be biased towards length, even for less important subjects. Sometimes a sketch is all that is needed. One day, maybe, maybe never, Wikipedia will feature an article that is just one paragraph long... I have a short span of attention, and will probably drift off into some other area... You have made a huge amount of useful contributions - keep it up! Aymatth2 (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i read your Sidon Makab section and i was puzzled how it escaped me and how it was not written before _knowing that the dump is now a regional landmark and a national symbol_ hehe, thank you mate and have a blessed Christmas. Eli+ 10:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been there - but my regular BBC reading prompted me to add that .. I found it on google Earth too. Well, I will take it off my watchlist as you are here :) Wizzy…☎ 11:01, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Manto2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wizzy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Anura Pereira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy, I was still reading the news articles for the the Zuma "love child" issue when you fixed the cites I thought were missing. It was fun working together - we should do it again! :) Roger (talk) 13:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Not very happy with the bulleted list, but headings would make the whole section too big. Wizzy…☎ 14:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes x1 §100 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.202.192 (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from Greece. May I ask why you've removed my art concerning Thessaloniki's current Mayor. In Hellenic edition of Wikipedia this is not a practice. Why here? All the best, --ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 07:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC) You did the same with my art in South Africa's President article too. Please inform me about the reason, since my work remains in EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG --ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 07:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the one on Jacob Zuma because it was a terrible piece of work ? And it added nothing to the article ? This is an encyclopedia, not a bad art site. Wizzy…☎ 08:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have no good manners. It's really a pity here...--ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 08:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Nigeria article, fula language is not counted as one of nigeria's major languages but it is represented when it comes to pronouncing Nigeria's full name republik federaal bu niiseriya and the top language pronounciation of Federal republic of Nigeria,republik nijeriya ,it is not written which language it belongs to.it resembles Hausa. Hausa again is at the bottom of the pronounciation article.Here is it,four major languages in nigeria HAUSA, YORUBA, IGBO AND IJAW according to the demographics of Nigerian languages on the page.Thanks earlymen talk 05:33,30 June 2010,(UTC)

Many thanks for the ref edits on the Selebi page. I have a lot to learn, obviously, but by studiously copying your edits I hope to get better. Thanks again.TheFallenCrowd (talk) 11:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. I kept all your refs as they were, but I named them so the References section does not fill up. But I don't think it is necessary to use the same ref in successive sentences - yes for different parts of the article, no for the same ref in the last sentence. We like prose, not a series of one-liners. Welcome to wikipedia, and Be Bold. Wizzy…☎ 16:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for adding the section with Jacob Zuma's family business dealings to his page. After reviewing the references, I didn't believe that the submitted changes were verifiable, neutral or encyclopedic. I've posted a full explanation on the talk page and removed the section. If you can find more reliable references, I do invite you to rewrite and resubmit the information.

On a personal note, corruption in government is rife and sickening (all around the world), and you'll probably be surprised that reading the references made me very angry and upset indeed. That said, I still don't believe that there were sufficient hard facts for it to be in a wikipedia article, especially because of WP:BLP. --HiltonLange (talk) 18:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizzy. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Senegalese presidential election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alliance of the Forces of Progress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wizzi as you know I am a complete novice at this. I opened edit of the previous section in order to add this 'talk' because I couldn't find the way to open a fresh topic page. Anyway, I have replied to your so welcome comment on my talk page but I'm not sure if I am supposed to reply on your page or notify you in some way that I have written a message.

I may have it all wrong, but would you just tell me whether when responding I should write a reply on your page or my own. Thank you, sorry for bothering you with such elementary questions!Sophena Chisembele 09:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophena Chisembele (talk • contribs)

It appears that I made an error which you corrected at Fine-structure constant‎. Thanks. I mistakenly thought the Anon IP was being sarcastic and I didn't closely check the content. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fort Tenedos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. E4024 (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the praise Wizzy! Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ingonyama Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ZIMBABWE-VOTE-MOYO-30.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean big as in lengthy? Yes, I finished it two weeks before April Fools', so I had the time to finish it before it ran (Actually, usually I do ... I don't take a kiss-and-nominate approach to DYK). Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Walter Jones and Stephen Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded this article quite a bit. Let me know if you still have any concerns about it. HelenOnline 06:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great! Wizzy…☎ 08:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy, I just wanted to let you know about, and invite you to, the 4th Cape Town Wiki-meetup at Truth Coffee on Buitenkant St on Sunday the 2nd of February. Cheers, --Discott (talk) 12:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy, I just wanted to apologise as I think I did not make it clear enought that we were meeting at the other Truth Coffee at 36 Buitenkant street instead of the Truth at the Prestwich Memorial. In the future I will make sure to avoid this confusion.--Discott (talk) 12:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy! Regarding your recent edit in the Gaia article, would you mind being a bit more specific about what is meant by accuracy? Accuracy of what? Regards. Gaba ^(talk) 14:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified it to absolute distance. ¬¬¬¬

Hi Wizzy, Wikimedia ZA would like to invite you to the 5th Cape Town Wiki-meetup for 11am, Sunday the 4th May 2014 at Truth Coffee on 36 Buitenkant Street, Cape Town. It would be great if you could join us. Please invite who ever you think might be interested.--Discott (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anura Pereira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholly negative BLP, no indication the subject meets the notability guidlines for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy, a conversation has started on Talk:1993 in South Africa about whether or not the term "terrorist" should be used when describing certain individuals. I would like to get your input on this as I feel it is an important discussion with regards to South African history articles in general especially ones that cover the anti-apartheid phase.--Discott (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy -

I made a large edit on T. B. Joshua that you undid, perhaps unintentionally. In that edit, I fixed caps in a section title per WP:SECTIONCAPS, took out a couple of mentions of T. B. Joshua's full name per WP:LASTNAME, fixed a wikilink to a Nigerian national honor and made other simple syntax changes (like changing Does death to Doe's death). You undid it with the edit summary "removed whitewashing". There was one instance where I changed the nonspecific "allegedly" to the specific "Joshua said" in accordance with WP:SAY and WP:ALLEGED.

Since all of these edits are pretty well founded in the Manual of Style or associated guidelines, I assume that you may have been looking at the wrong edit when you pressed Undo. I know that has happened to me before when undoing something in a high-traffic article. I went ahead and restored my edit because I am so sure that it was correct. If there are any policy- or guideline-based issues that I still need to address, just let me know. Thanks, Wizzy. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy, it sounds like you guys were there at Truth? There were 3 of us also there but I did not see you or Ian. We landed up getting a table for 5 at the back of the cafe and put up some signs. It sounds like we missed each other even though we were at the same location.--Discott (talk) 12:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just spoke with Greenman about having Cape Town 10 in early October so we can make up for missing each other today.--Discott (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Manto2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy. I was going to start a WP:3O process over the nascent edit war I was having with the two COI editors over on Kigeli. Assuming you're uninvolved, would you instead be willing to review a couple of edits that I'd like to make to remove the OR that they've inserted. No pressure, I can set up a formal 3O if you'd rather. If yes, then I'll post to the Talk page and ping you when it's done. Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't pretend I know a lot on the subject, but I am happy to review. Wizzy…☎ 04:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizzy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Wizzy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_0jpkfD1WUVehqoR&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to notify you, as your scripts may be impacted, that the categories listed at User:Wizzy/CDTools#Categories have been deleted. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 18:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizzy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Bernard Borrel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Bernard Borrel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzy

Interested in joining the South African Wikipedia Discord?
If you are interested in a joining, please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/South Africa/Discord for more Infomation or click the button below Everyone in Southern Africa is Welcome, for any technical issues or questions about Discord, Please ask User:TapticInfo on his talk page Join Server

I’d like to personally invite you to the Wikimedia South Africa Discord. We host monthly meet-ups at the end of each month and have discussions on the platform. For any enquiries feel free to ask me TapticInfo (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sibelco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mzoli's has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sahaib (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]