Feel free to leave me a message. I will reply on your talk page.

Archives

1

Thanks for uploading File:Dexter's Laboratory - The Musical Time Machine (album).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI regarding this edit you made in the Ebert article, it is incorrect to say that "3 paragraphs are standard". MOS:LEAD actually says that the lead "should ideally contain no more than four paragraphs". More specifically, WP:LEADLENGTH instructs that articles with more than 30,000 characters should be either three or four paragraphs. The Ebert article has 80,000 characters. Also, it's best to avoid combining two completely unrelated paragraphs, such as you did when you merged the praise and health content (paragraphs 3 and 4). Have a good week. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 01:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply you put on my talk page. I have moved it here so that the discussion is not happening in two different places, which puts it out of context. You wrote:
"Although MOS does indeed say that, the general consensus among editors is limiting it to 3 paragraphs, as most (if not all) FAs and GAs have 3 paragraph leads. The reason I put the "praises" after information about his death is because those came AFTER he died, so it was in chronological order. That being said, I won't try to revert it back to 3 if you feel it so important to keep it at 4. No big deal, just thought I'd voice my reasoning. yonnie (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)"[1][reply]
I think your opening words said it all: "MOS does indeed say that". Exactly. (smile) So that really should be the end of the discussion. Although you claim that "3 paragraphs are standard" and "the general consensus among editors is limiting it to 3 paragraphs", you have provided no diffs to support it, and numerous editors have said it's simply not true or accurate. Nevertheless, that assertion is clearly not what the rules on this matter say. And multiple highly experienced editors/admins, such as Sj and ThaddeusB, have said the same thing and also reverted the content back to four paragraphs. Again, MOS:LEAD and WP:LEADLENGTH are very clear on this matter. The lead of MOS:LEAD says, "it should ideally contain no more than four paragraphs" and the WP:LEADLENGTH table instructs than an article with more than 30,000 characters should have "three or four paragraphs" in the lead. The Ebert article is more than double that, 80,000! Therefore, a four-paragraph lead is perfectly in line with policy. In fact, some knowledgeable bio editors have suggested that five paragraphs would be appropriate because of the large amount of content. I disagree with that, but the policy per WP:LEADLENGTH does point out that a four-paragraph maximum is "not an absolute rule". Finally, in terms of the praise and health/death information, it is never a good idea to merge unrelated content like that. For the record, leads are intended to be primarily in logical order, not chronological. Hope this helps. If you have any more questions or concerns on this matter, feel free to contact Sj or Thaddeus. Have a great rest of the week! --76.189.111.2 (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neither source mentions that it was pulled after its initial airing. The only CN toon I know of like that is "Buffalo Gals" from Cow and Chicken. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 21:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ASC (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madison Rising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article G-Stone Book has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 13:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kruder & Dorfmeister - The G-Stone Book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Dreadstar ☥ 21:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• This notice relates to Gamergate controversy, Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and related articles, talk pages and edits, but note this this alert applies to all edits related to the area identified above. Dreadstar ☥ 21:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yonskii. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dexter's Laboratory - The Musical Time Machine (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 08:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Silver apples garden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]