• User_talk:Zaphraud/2007
• User_talk:Zaphraud/2008
• User_talk:Zaphraud/2009
• User_talk:Zaphraud/2010

Hi. When you recently edited Lovaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ethanol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zaphraud! I just read your comment on the TCM talk page. TCM (actually, alternative medicine altogether) is a topic which can make some people very emotional, and I can understand your frustration with sceptic comments like the one you reacted to. Just please remember, keep it civil. The term "idiotic" should not appear in WP discussions. Cheers, --Mallexikon (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Refrigerant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supercritical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello :3

♣thayora♣ 04:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care when removing references. Google book links are considered appropriate when used to verify sourced information. They are not spam. If you think the book is not reliable for the information cited, make a case on the talk page or take it to WP:RSN. --Ronz (talk) 07:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, way to dodge the facts. I'm pretty sure the commercial "for dummies" books are pop culture, not reference material, even if they're hosted on the most popular target for index spam on the planet ...Zaphraud (talk) 07:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your full edit summary was, "spam cleanup: remove reference to pop-culture "... for dummies" books featuring direct link to google (search index spam, specifically)" Those are the facts. If you have other concerns with the reference beyond those you expressed in that edit summary, you should make them on the article talk page. --Ronz (talk) 04:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DOINK! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.233.248 (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the friendly desert! Zaphraud (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Brian Chesky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Developer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zaphraud, is that you? There is a nice saying in German: ... Sage mir was du ißt und ich sage dir wer du bist. Lotje (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yep that's one of the few German phrases I know.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tetrahydrogestrinone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clandestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have come to the conclusion over the years that there is no way to refer to race in humans without offending somebody - no term is "neutral" unless it's so long and vague as to be useless - "the people who were living there at the time that people from Europe arrived" or something like that. "Indigenous" seems acceptable for the moment, probably something else will come along in a few years and it will change, and then that will change, etc. But "non-European" did strike me as wrong, sort of like "non-white" when talking about the scads of different peoples who live in the US. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with you? Do you actually think it's a good idea to move WP:BLPs to titles calling them felons without discussion and sources, and to make changes calling them a felon in articles without sources? If you do this again I will take it to ANI because this is way out of line, IRWolfie- (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding material to any article, supported by RS, is one thing. Changing the article title as you did is quite another. Indeed, I was shocked. It was an injection of POV, pure and simple. – S. Rich (talk) 16:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's really what he's most known for, as of recently. This is probably a shock to his limited number of fans, but that doesn't change the fact that stealing millions of dollars is quite significant, and that the headline news, reported worldwide, reached far more readers in a single day than his publications will throughout all of time. Zaphraud (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He plead guilty - the man himself admits it. That's what makes it not a BLP violation, but obviously you can't just go trusting felons as sources for wikipedia articles, so you will be relieved to know that he's got a page on fbi.gov too: [1]. Zaphraud (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not for you to speculate that a plea bargain makes someone a felon. Calling someone a felon in their article title, to define them as a person, is way out of line. It is a gross BLP violation. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no speculation involved at all. Pleading guilty to a felony crime makes one a felon. It's the definition of the word! The only part of his trial that hasn't completed is the sentencing phase. That's where it will be determined if he is a prisoner or not. He's already a felon. Zaphraud (talk) 04:00, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheesh" is exactly right. Come on, you simply made an honest mistake in retitling the article. Say mea culpa and be done with this. – S. Rich (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK fair enough. Zaphraud (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brian Dunning (felon). Since you had some involvement with the Brian Dunning (felon) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IRWolfie- (talk) 09:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anycast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Bismuth slag from pepto bismol.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:CHANOLOGY PROTESTS MudkipCake.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I should ask you since I assumed that link had been added by a vandal: if you had to guess, how many people would you say went looking for flavivirus and somehow accidentally typed "Flavor Flav?" I'm trying to assume good faith here, but that might be the most senseless and, possibly, insidious disambig I've ever come across. RunnyAmiga (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zaphraud. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wins for Toyota — Safety Group. Since you had some involvement with the Wins for Toyota — Safety Group redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Asia-CaSO4 is CaSO3.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zaphraud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article ABC gum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable topic - unclear what information it is trying to impart

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, ABC gum. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chewing gum. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chewing gum. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zaphraud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde clathrate. Since you had some involvement with the 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde clathrate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Don Cuan (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]