Former featured pictures This page lists pictures that used to be featured pictures, but were demoted because they do not meet current featured picture criteria. Featured pictures can only be demoted through a consensus derived through discussion at the featured picture candidates page. Archives: Index 2006  · 2007  · 2008  · 2009  · 2010  · 2011  · 2012  · 2013  · 2014  · 2015  · 2016  · 2017  · 2018  · 2019  · 2020

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists Featured pictures ← On Wikimedia Commons Featured topics Featured picture tools: Featured picture criteria Featured picture candidates Nomination procedure On Wikimedia Commons Featured picture candidates archive Featured pictures thumbs Picture of the day Picture of the day archive Random featured picture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2021 at 11:46:11 (UTC)

Reason

Has not been used in the species article for eight years. The existing FP File:Red wattlebird.jpg has higher resolution and better bokeh.

Articles this image appears in

Anthochaera

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red Wattlebird

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 11:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. This one is still the lead image of Anthochaera but I am convinced by the argument about the better quality of the other image. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 17:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist (t · c) buidhe 08:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 January 2021 at 00:01 UTC

Reason

No longer used in any articles, replaced by recently promoted FP File:Raspberries (Rubus idaeus).jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/raspberries

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 11:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, although it's somewhat automatic at this point. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 17:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist in cases like this could indeed be made directly by an admin. --Janke | Talk 18:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's in the rules. No usage at the end of a delist is grounds for delisting, regardless of votes. The delist serves as warning to put it in articles of it's not to be auto-delisted, but that's unlikely in this case. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 20:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 May 2021 at 01:03:24 (UTC)

Reason

Relatively low resolution (1,024 × 768 px), partially blurry, lots of JPEG artifacting. (Plus the plant is unidentified, limiting the image's encylopedic value.)

Articles this image appears in

Leaf, Plant, Ecology, Photosynthesis, etc.

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Veined Leaf

Nominator

Kaldari (talk)

• Delist — Kaldari (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom. Also doesn't show the full leaf... MER-C 19:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 02:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist does not meet the criteria (t · c) buidhe 04:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2021 at 15:23:47 (UTC)

Reason

As much as it's a useful gif for demonstrating how roundabouts work, it's definitely not the best we can offer and most definitely not a featured picture a decade-and-a-half after being promoted. Our standards have changed and this is a low-quality stuttering 25 frame gif that arguably has many of the cars driving dangerously (and therefore not a very educational gif in regard to road safety). Undeniably fails WP:FP?#3 and arguably WP:FP?#2.

Articles this image appears in

Microsimulation, Roundabout, Traffic conflict

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/June-2004#UK_Roundabout_8_Cars

Nominator

Anarchyte (talk • work)

• Delist — Anarchyte (talk • work) 15:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per the nomination statement. This isn't an example of our best work on the grounds of quality and accuracy. Nick-D (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom. --Janke | Talk 11:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 18:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2021 at 16:32:25 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with higher resolution, recently featured image File:Lemon - whole and split.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lemon

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 16:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulphere 18:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 10:35:38 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with higher resolution, recently featured image File:Torii path with lantern at Fushimi Inari Taisha Shrine, Kyoto, Japan.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kyoto Fushimi Inari shrine

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 10:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --Janke | Talk 15:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 12:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2021 at 23:16:39 (UTC)

Reason

Image is below current minimum resolution requirements (1,600 × 1,067 pixels); the scale is just a guess according to the original FPC discussion (based on measurements of a different spider); the licensing is crappy (CC-BY-NC + GFDL 1.2-only); and natural backgrounds are now preferred for animal photos (AFAICT).

Articles this image appears in

Holoplatys

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Holoplatys semiplanata.jpg

Nominator

Nosferattus (talk)

• Delist — Nosferattus (talk) 23:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – I read the reason section and thought why are you nominating it for promotion!? :-) Bammesk (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Yann (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --Janke | Talk 15:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2022 at 12:24:56 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with newly promoted FP File:Avocado Hass - single and halved.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Avocado with cross section.jpg, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Avocado cross section

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --Janke | Talk 11:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs} 03:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --The helper5667 (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 02:46:18 (UTC)

Reason

Noticed that this image fails the second criterion as its 1,024 × 731 pixels, being much too small for the minimum.

Articles this image appears in

Shuffling

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle delist

Nominator

GamerPro64

• Delist — GamerPro64 02:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist While I don't think we should delist historic FPs just because they're of resolutions too low for modern FPs, this hits a number of problems beyond that, like the unneccessary black and white. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 16:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. With no historical significance to this particular image, it would be easily replaced by a new image of appropriate quality. A different version of the same image appears to be available at double the resolution at File:Deuces Wild (44276782).jpeg but that is still low by modern standards and doesn't affect the other issues. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 11:28:56 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced by newly promoted FP File:Mockingbird in Bay Ridge (85082).jpg.

Articles this image appears in

Residual uses, can be replaced.

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mimus-polyglottos-002 edit.jpg

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – I forgot about this. Thanks. Bammesk (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist if it matters at this point (any image not in use at the end of a delist nom is delisted automatically) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 21:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2022 at 17:00:38 (UTC)

Reason

Quite simply, the Library of Congress has rescanned this, it's now far, far better quality than the one we used to have, and thus a much better restoration can be done. Also, given it's used on Chromolithography, cutting out the colour check on the right - which shows the inks appearing in it and provides a quick check that all of them were printed - seems counterproductive when it only adds value. A defining feature of Chromolithography is the number of inks used in the high-end stuff, which this demonstrates.

On the restoration, I've checked, and in other paintings of the same scene he made he put a paint spill on the ground about where there's a blotch in this one, so I think that blotch in the shadow between her and the easel is meant to be there.

Articles this image appears in

Chromolithography, and, perhaps more questionably, Gabriele Castagnola

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/"Love or Duty" and Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Love or dutyb.jpg

Nominator

Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs}

• Delist and replace — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist and replace – Bammesk (talk) 01:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Replace. MER-C 05:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2022 at 12:40:10 (UTC)

Reason

Low quality, composition, not used in any article

Articles this image appears in

-

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Su-27 on landing

Nominator

Andrei (talk)

• Delist — Andrei (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, though it's probably academic at this point. There's basically zero chance of it returning to use. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 13:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 05:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2022 at 18:37:43 (UTC)

Reason

Legs appear heavily photoshopped (where are her knees?), butt proportions seem way off, spine should likely have cracked.... Honestly, I think this was a reasonable FP for when it happened, and it should have been on the main page years ago. But it's far, far too late for it now.

Articles this image appears in

Michele Merkin, Handbra

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Michele Merkin 1.jpg Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg

Nominator

Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs}

• Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 18:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – EV, i.e. I don't see much in her article that relates to nudity in her career. Bammesk (talk) 02:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Not a horrible photo, but not featured quality. Looking at it, i fail to see any educational value. The helper5667 (talk) 03:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think best case scenario, it's a photo of her, in her job as a model. However, it's also not even the lead image in her article. I have the vague idea it used to be in glamour photography, which I think would do a lot to justify it, but it's not there now. And then there's the... simply terrible usage from the original nomination. [1]. I somewhat feel bad nominating it, because I feel as POTD co-ordinator I should be a little more dispassionate, but it's also clear people are willing to spend three pages complaining about how bad of an image it is without taking any concrete action, so perhaps I can justify the nomination on the grounds of "I'm speaking up for people who will not listen to advice on proper forum to deal with the objections they're making". Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am not familiar with the featured picture process so I have no vote, but I would like to point out that this picture is being discussed at Talk:Main Page#Planned POTD 2022-06-13 (File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg). Delisting this image does not resolve questions of what is or is not appropriate for POTD. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 03:45, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, if the objection is, as it was there, that the image isn't good enough for featured picture status, this 100% resolves the question. If there's anything else worth objecting to in the queue, I'm 100% sure I'll hear about it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That comment from a single user did not refer to the image's status as a featured picture. It referred to suitability as an image to be POTD. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 23:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This, not POTD, is the most appropriate venue to deal with quality issues. Other issues are irrelevant if quality isn't there, because quality alone can block it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 01:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – Exploitive, gimmicky, lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – --Janke | Talk 15:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - poor quality image, a poor example of the genre, an inaccurate likeness of the person, little if any educational value. Levivich 20:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom, and per Levivich: this just isn't a good photo, and the EV is very low. Nick-D (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2022 at 14:41:06 (UTC)

Reason

Not used in any English Wikipedia articles, and per User talk:Sasata/Archive 23#POTD notification 2 it is likely misidentified.

Articles this image appears in

N/A

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Amanita caesarea

Nominator

--Ahecht (TALK
PAGE)

• Delist — --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 14:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Although, since it's unused, it's basically automatic unless someone can find A. a good enough identification that we can use the image with confidence (Sasata's message may well be enough), and B. a place to use it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – unused and uncertain identification. Bammesk (talk) 01:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – --Janke | Talk 11:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist The helper5667 (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist pending correct identification and actual use in an article. At least the image itself is of high quality. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  To be fair, it is identified, sort of, but as a provisional species. Which means that until it's made an official species, it's in a limbo. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 18:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Is this a good enough source to add it to List of Amanita species? There are other species in that list indicated as indefinite, and there is room for the image. I'd rather not do so myself, since the only thing I know about mushrooms is not to eat ones found anywhere except the grocery store. blameless 21:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The name has definitely made its way into the literature, but (just from some quick googling) it looks like the species hasn't been formerly named yet. For example, it has an entry in this book, which is from a university press. (The lead author is a prolific mycologist.) This seems to be the original (but not formally published) description; at least, it's cited in at least one scholarly paper. But this isn't a straightforward situation. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2022 at 14:42:32 (UTC)

Reason

Tiny, bad quality, nothing to replace with

Articles this image appears in

none

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ivan the Terrible

Nominator

Andrei (talk)

• Delist — Andrei (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• https://dezoomify.ophir.dev/#https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/fullimages/dz_canvas/z-4401/dzc_output_files/0/0_0.jpg from https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/data/collections/painting/19_20/zh_4401/index.php?lang=en ? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 21:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist and replace Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 21:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is rather bad digitization on my humble opinion. And its watermarked. I am often opposed cloning out trash from photos, but cloning out a watermark from the painting is basically equal to conservation/restoration. Not acceptable under any circumstances. --Andrei (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

      Fair point. It's better, but maybe not there. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 22:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist (t · c) buidhe 20:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 21:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 09:19:02 (UTC)

Reason

This image is not used in any articles, and has no longer EV

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Uranus

Nominator

The NMI User (talk)

• Delist — The NMI User (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• It was replaced with File:Uranus as seen by NASA's Voyager 2 (remastered).png. MER-C 11:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Replace. MER-C 18:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Per MER-C, I would support a delist and replace nom. Bammesk (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I mean, if it's not used in any articles, it's an anti-Semitic at time of closure. Delist if it matters Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 16:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• We shouldn't delist FPs every time they are replaced with higher quality versions of themselves. The image is used in articles (just not the older version). Bammesk (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It happens, though. Have to renominate Love and Duty, for instance. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 17:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair enough, I introduced the newer version, Support delist and replace. Bammesk (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ...and replace is fine with me. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 18:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 18:35:23 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with newly promoted FP File:Landscape Arch Utah.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Landscape Arch

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 18:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 02:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. Pro forma. This is still a pretty good image but there can be only one. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Ditto. Better sky BG, too. – Sca (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Yann (talk) 20:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2022 at 02:53:37 (UTC)

Reason

A higher resolution image, Here, was recently nominated, Here, and passed. The nominated image has a low pixel count (less than 1500 pixels) and is no longer used in articles.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Purple mangosteen

Nominator

Bammesk (talk)

• Delist — Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom, and my comments at the recent FPC (it's a weird way to slice the fruit). --Paul_012 (talk) 14:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 18:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, although, unless it's added to articles, it's basically an auto-delist at this point. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 03:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 16:42:08 (UTC)

Reason

Gazumped by recently promoted FP File:House sparrow male in Prospect Park (53532).jpg.

Gazumped? – Sca (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:House Sparrow mar08.jpg

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 16:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 02:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Sca (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Janke | Talk 19:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 02:53:50 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with a higher resolution FP File:Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the south).jpg

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grand prismatic spring.jpg

Nominator

Bammesk (talk)

• Delist — Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist — Agree. --Janke | Talk 13:44, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 14:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --Carsten Steger (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Choliamb (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2023 at 14:33:14 (UTC)

Reason

Replaced with recently promoted, higher resolution FP File:Rathen und Elbsandsteingebirge asv2022-08 img04.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bastei

Nominator

MER-C

• Delist — MER-C 14:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Choliamb (talk) 19:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Sca (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Comparing the two, the candidate (Bastei) has softer and more even lighting, which I prefer. The second (...img04.jpg) seems to have a bit aggressive local contrast. Composition is more balanced in my opinion, too. Resolution is about 40.5 MP vs 36 MP, which is a very slight 11% more. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 11:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – I see no compelling reason to delist, since it is a good alternative re. weather, clouding etc. Janke | Talk 10:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Honestly, I prefer this one to the the cooler colours of the new FP. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• While there is no consensus to delist this image, an image that isn't used in any articles can not retain it's featured status and is therefore delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 May 2023 at 08:41:25 (UTC)

Reason

Okay. First of all, a version of this with lower pixel size, but far more detail exists: File:Charles Darwin by Elliott & Fry, 1874.png. It's restored well, but the Library of Congress version is degraded, and that's... basically a fundamental obstacle.

It's also questionably dated: Harvard says 1874, this says c. 1880. This is kind of a problem when one of the big draws of it was having a date nearer certain books' publication. It was put in Rotogravure as an example. There's no source for it being a rotogravure. It has contrast issues: His face and hair blend into the background, and that's not really an issue in the original. I think we can have multiple FPs of Darwin. Having a frontal portrait, an early portrait - there's many valuable options. However, they need to be the best copy of the image we have at the minimum, and that's not what we have now.

Articles this image appears in

None, though that's my doing.

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Charles Darwin

Nominator

Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!}

• Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 08:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist --Janke | Talk 17:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2023 at 20:22:03 (UTC)

Reason

Although this was good for 2011, it hasn't held up. I've uploaded File:The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife, British Museum, version 1 (cropped).jpg, which is from the British Museum (more reputable colours) and of significant enough resolution to see the grain of the paper. It also shows correctly that this was a diptych. Unfortunately, that copy has some dirt and muck, so I don't think a D&R is feasible here.

Articles this image appears in

The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife +5, though I'll be replacing if this gets delisted

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tako to Ama; previous delist nomination

Nominator

 — Chris Woodrich (talk)

• Delist —  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 01:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 17:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist About time. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 01:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2023 at 21:39:00 (UTC)

Reason

This photo has been superseded by Abraham_Lincoln_O-77_matte_collodion_print.jpg. A lot of details, such as wrinkles on Abe's face, are missing. There is even a signature on the photograph.

Articles this image appears in

1809, Alexander Gardner (photographer), American School (economics), Historiographic issues about the American Civil War, History of Western civilization, History of the Republican Party (United States), Illinois Republican Party, Income tax in the United States, Lawyer, List of assassinated American politicians, List of people from Indiana, Luke P. Blackburn, Melanocytic nevus, National Union Party (United States), Religious views of Abraham Lincoln, Republican Party (United States), Selim E. Woodworth, Shenandoah (beard), and every article which features Template:Lincoln cabinet.

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Abraham Lincoln head on shoulders photo portrait.jpg

Nominator

Howardcorn33 (talk)

• Delist — Howardcorn33 (talk) 21:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist —UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - Gosh, it's amazing how busy FP was back in those days. Between the weird white sliver, false copyright claim (this sure as heck wasn't taken in 1900), and quality of the reproduction, this doesn't pass muster anymore.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Bammesk (talk) 03:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do wish the replacement wasn't so horribly documented. It's definitely not from the source given. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 00:33:19 (UTC)

Reason

It was replaced with a higher resolution FP here: File:Pez ballesta ondulado (Balistapus undulatus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-15, DD 45.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

None

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Balistapus undulatus (Nausicaä).jpg

Nominator

Bammesk (talk)

• Delist — Bammesk (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist. MER-C 16:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Hamid Hassani (talk) 19:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2023 at 05:07:23 (UTC)

Reason

Image resolution is just too small by modern FP standards, and it's the image is a bit crusty when you zoom in

Articles this image appears in

The Narrows (Zion National Park)

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/April-2004#Zion_Narrows

Nominator

Bremps...

• Delist — Bremps... 05:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  We've come a long way with featured images. Bremps... 05:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist per nom. Also fails the "minimum of 1500 pixels in width and height" criterion. It's probably not the only Zion Narrows pic available. GeraldWL 07:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - per nom. GamerPro64 05:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 15:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – TheHistoryBuff101 18:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]