1. Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
2. Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat offenses.

• one account restriction
• topic ban from discussions on geographic naming conventions (Suspended by Motion)
• prohibition on moving or renaming pages (except within their own userspace). He may move userspace or draftspace pages to mainspace for the purpose of creating his one article per month as an exception to this restriction; amended by motion.
• prohibition on creating new pages, including creating articles on pages where one didn't previously exist (except within their own userspace and talk pages of existing pages in any namespace) One new article per week in user or draft space (including redirects and disambiguation pages), submitted to AFC He may create at most one new mainspace article per month through any process. He is not required to use the Articles for Creation process, and is not permitted to use it to exceed this rate. This restriction includes the creation of new content at a title that is a redirect or disambiguation page; amended by motion and subsquently amended by motion; clarified by motion 1, motion 2.

1. Any process in which the content of the main page is selected, including Did you know?, In the news, On this day, Today's featured article, Today's featured list, and Today's featured picture.
2. Any process in which possible problems with the content of the main page are reported, including WP:ERRORS and Talk:Main Page.
3. Any discussion about the above processes, regardless of venue.

He may edit articles linked from or eligible to be linked from the main page (e.g., the current featured article) and may participate in content review processes not directly connected to main page content selection (e.g., reviewing Featured article candidates). He may request reconsideration of this restriction twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

Roscelese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to the following restrictions. Other than in cases of indisputable vandalism or BLP violations, they are indefinitely prohibited from:

• making more than one revert per page per day, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page;
• making rollback-type reverts that fail to provide an explanation for the revert;
• Roscelese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely prohibited from engaging in conduct which, in the opinion of any uninvolved administrator, casts aspersions, or personalises disputes.

These restrictions may be appealed to the committee twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. Should Roscelese breach any of these restrictions, she may be blocked for per the standard Enforcement provision below.

• Commenting on, or interacting with, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs)
• Commenting on, or interacting with, Cla68 (talk · contribs)
• Participating in any discussion concerning the conduct of SightWatcher (talk · contribs).

This motion should be enforced under the enforcement clauses of the Race and intelligence final decision.

On 10 April 2016, the following amendment was passed by the Committee:

Following a successful appeal to the Committee the October 2013 amendment to the Race and intelligence case is rescinded and Mathsci (talk · contribs) is unbanned from the English Wikipedia. The unban has been granted on the condition that Mathsci continue to refrain from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to the race and intelligence topic area, broadly construed. This is to be enforced as a standard topic ban. (rescinded 21 January 2017) The following editing restrictions are in force indefinitely:

• The two-way interaction bans with The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs) and Cla68 (talk · contribs) enacted in a September 2013 amendment to the Race and intelligence case.
• A two-way interaction ban with Ferahgo the Assassin (talk · contribs) is enacted in accordance with the Race and intelligence case review.

This motion is to be enforced under the enforcement clauses of the Race and intelligence case.

1. Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
2. Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat offenses.

Hajji Piruz and the other users placed on revert limitation in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan#Remedies are subject to supervised editing. They may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should they fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in their interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.

Suspended for a period of six months by motion. During the period of suspension, this topic ban may be reinstated by any uninvolved administrator, as an arbitration enforcement action, should Cinderella157 (talk · contribs) fail to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations in the topic area. Appeal of such a reinstatement would follow the normal arbitration enforcement appeals process. After six months from the date this motion is enacted, if the topic ban has not been reinstated or any reinstatements have been successfully appealed, the topic ban will automatically lapse.

With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:

• GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as this one, or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
• GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.

Violations may be reported by any editor to WP:AE. GiantSnowman may appeal any or all of these sanctions, including the review itself, directly to the Arbitration Committee at any time.

1. Mike Searson
2. Eric Corbett
3. Sitush
4. Scalhotrod

This editing restriction shall include a complete prohibition from comments on the respective user talk pages, filing reports on admin noticeboards, reverting edits on articles, commenting in other venues about the other party, or directly responding to each other's comments on article talk pages. This restriction by itself does not prohibit mutual participation on articles, as long as the editors stay away from each other. The restriction is to be interpreted broadly.

Imposed by community consensus.

Note: User:Factsontheground renamed to User:Factomancer shortly after imposition of this restriction.

Community sanction imposed from this discussion and agreement of both editors. Amendment per this

• Amended 2010-09-24

1. Wikidea is subject to an editing restriction (probation). Should he make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be disruptive, he may be banned from any affected pages or set of pages.
2. Wikidea is banned from interacting with, or, directly or indirectly, commenting on THF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on any page in Wikipedia.

The ban will take effect once an administrator has posted a notice on his talk page and logged it at User:Wikidea/Community sanction. If he is also banned from using affected talk pages, this must be specified in the notice and log.

Note — this remedy may be expanded in scope to include interaction of any other user if it is later deemed necessary in the opinion of 3 administrators to prevent harassment. See also User:Wikidea/Community sanction.

This restriction may be lifted in the future IF Stefanomione has shown to be consistently following the second restriction (b, below) over a decent period of time, absolutely no less than 3 months (with at least 6 months being preferable).

b.) Also that if any (presumably manually done, per the restriction above) category creation or modification done by Stefanomione is contested, he must stop and discuss, gaining a consensus before continuing, per WP:BRD.

Violation of these restrictions may result in being blocked.

• The user sticks to one account from now on;
• He will be held to his voluntary TBAN from Aspartame, Matt Drudge, David Copperfield, and all climate change articles;
• Also [he will be held to a] voluntary probation that allows uninvolved admins to TBAN him from any future BLP around which issues arise.

1. You are indefinitely banned from using any special signatures. It must only be plain text containing only your username, and a link to your talk, formatted as "Donald Trung (talk)" or "Donald Trung". You are not required to link to both your user or talk page. One of them must be linked, however. The signature cannot link elsewhere. You are allowed to precede your signature with 2 hyphens or a long mdash, like my signature. Your timestamp cannot have special formatting.
2. You are indefinitely banned from all namespaces except for Article, Talk, User, and User talk pages. The only exceptions are discussions where you are a subject of the discussion. In 6 months you may participate in deletion discussions, and AFC, provided you have been keeping in line with all restrictions.
3. You are indefinitely prohibited from using alternate accounts, or editing logged out, on the English Wikipedia. Accidental logouts are fine as long as they are immediately rectified by signing on and stating it was an accident. Too many "accidents" may and will be seen as gaming.
4. If you directly violate any of these restrictions, you are to stop immediately and resume productive editing. Failing that will result in your block being reinstated, and you to be subject to an indefinite site ban, which can be imposed by any admin if they deem appropriate.
5. If you try to game these restrictions by being disruptive elsewhere, as defined by observing admins, not you, your block will be reinstated, and you will be subject to an indefinite site ban, which can be imposed by any admin if they deem appropriate.

• AMENDMENT TO 2: The ban on namespaces is loosened to allow participation in the template and category namespaces and their respective talk pages.
• AMENDMENT TO 2: The ban on namespaces is loosened to allow participation in the File and respective talk namespaces.
• AMENDMENT TO 2: The ban on namespaces is loosened to allow participation in the Draft and respective talk namespaces.

• Amended 2018-05-18
• Amended 2018-06-30
• Amended 2018-09-14

• DePiep is indefinitely topic-banned from all edits related to WP:DYK, broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed in not less than six months from the enactment of these sanctions.
• DePiep is placed indefinitely under an editing restriction, in which he is subject to immediate sanction (including blocks) if he makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, or personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith. This restriction may be appealed in not less than six months from the enactment of these sanctions.
• DePiep may regain permissions as a template editor only by way of a successful application at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions.
• DePiep is reminded to engage in good faith discussion, and to communicate clearly, with other editors about any contentious edits he might make or consider making, and to consider other editors' concerns with respect.

• Original TBAN, July 2016
• Appeal declined, January 2017
• Appeal granted, May 2020
• Ban reinstated, July 2020

Amendment: JsfasdF252 unblocked from the User namespace.

• Gender and sexuality, broadly construed, in any namespace.
• Requests for adminship, Requests for permissions, and any other venue where a user's permissions may be changed.

Athaenara must remain unblocked for at least one year to be eligible to appeal these restrictions.

• All content pages that Doug Coldwell has significantly contributed to, or discussions in other namespaces related to those pages, broadly construed.
• Ludington, Michigan, broadly construed.

• Immanuelle is limited to one user account.
• Immanuelle is prohibited from using any AI-assisted editing tools, or machine translation from any language, in any article or draft. They must also ensure that no content added to articles violates copyright.
• Immanuelle is prohibited from self-publishing articles to mainspace or reverting draftification. Any new articles must be submitted via Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
• Immanuelle must not merge content into other articles as a response to having a draft declined or an article nominated for deletion.

• Dronebogus is indefinitely topic-banned from closing any XfD discussion.
• Dronebogus is indefinitely topic-banned from miscellany for deletion, broadly construed.

This ban may be enforced by escalating blocks. It may be appealed after six months of active editing since enactment or the most recent unsuccessful appeal. The intent of "six months of active editing" is so that extended absences don't count towards the six months, it is not a requirement for six consecutive months of active editing.